Compare ID HJM 1 (2025) and ID HJM 17 (2026)

The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.

547 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.

This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.

ID HJM 1 (2025)ID HJM 17 (2026)
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-eighth Legislature First Regular Session - 2025 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 1 BY STATE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE A JOINT MEMORIAL 1 TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of 3 the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth 4 Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: 5 WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in 6 Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution 7 of the United States and the principles upon which the United States is es- 8 tablished; and 9 WHEREAS…LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-eighth Legislature Second Regular Session - 2026 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 17 BY STATE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE A JOINT MEMORIAL 1 TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Sen- 3 ate of the State of Idaho assembled in the Second Regular Session of the 4 Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: 5 WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in 6 Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution 7 of the United States and the principles upon which the United States is es- 8 tablished; and 9 WH…
for more 42 than 800 years; and 43 2 WHEREAS, Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected this definition 1 of marriagefor more than 2,000 years; and 41 WHEREAS, Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected this definition 42 of marriage
in favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key clauses within 2 the Constitution and our nation's legal and culturalin favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key 1 clauses within the Constitution and our nation's legal and cultural
and 3 WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only legislatures elected 4 by the people may pass laws, Obergefell is an illegitimate overreachand 12 WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only legislatures elected 13 by the people may pass laws, Obergefell is an illegitimate overreach
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of theNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the
of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, the House of Representatives 7 and the Senate concurring therein, that the Idaho Legislature rejects the 8 Obergefell decision. 9 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Idaho Legislature calls upon the Supreme 10 Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell and restore the natural def- 11 inition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman. 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Idaho Legislature insists on restoring 13 the issue of marriage and enforcement of all laws pertaining to marriage back 14 to the several states and the people. 15 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Clerk of the House of Representa- 16 tives be, and she is hereby authorized and d…of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, the House of Representatives 24 and the Senate concurring therein, that the Idaho Legislature rejects the 25 Obergefell decision. 26 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Idaho Legislature calls upon the Supreme 27 Court of the United States to reverse Obergefell and restore the natural def- 28 inition of marriage, a union of one man and one woman. 29 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Idaho Legislature insists on restoring 30 the issue of marriage and enforcement of all laws pertaining to marriage back 31 to the several states and the people. 32 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Clerk of the House of Representa- 33 tives is hereby authorized and directed t…