Compare ID HJM 17 (2026) and SD HCR 6010 (2026)
The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.
- ID HJM 17 (2026) · Idaho · 2026 · Failed
- SD HCR 6010 (2026) · South Dakota · 2026 · Failed
305 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.
This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.
| ID HJM 17 (2026) | SD HCR 6010 (2026) |
|---|---|
| WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in 6 Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution 7 of the United States and the principles upon which the United States is es- 8 tablished; and 9 WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from 10 governmental action, not as a right to a particular governmental | WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. 3 Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution of the United States and the 4 principles upon which the United States was established; and 5 WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from governmental 6 action, not as a right to a particular governmental |
| a definition of "liberty" that the framers 13 would not have recognized | a definition of “liberty” that the Framers would not have 8 recognized |
| comes from the government; and 16 WHEREAS, when the framers proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence 17 that "all men are created equal" and "endowed by their Creator with certain 18 unalienable Rights," they referred to a vision of mankind in which all humans 19 are created in the image of God and therefore of inherent worth; and 20 WHEREAS, Obergefell undermines this vision by declaring that citizens 21 must seek dignity from the state; and 22 WHEREAS, Obergefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due 23 Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as a font of 24 substantive rights, a doctrine that strays from the full meaning of the Con- 25 stitution… | comes from the 10 government; and 11 WHEREAS, when the Framers proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence that "all men 12 are created equal" and "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights," they 13 referred to a vision of mankind in which all humans are created in the image of God and 14 therefore are of inherent worth; and 15 WHEREAS, Obergefell undermines this vision by declaring that citizens must seek dignity 16 from the state; and 17 WHEREAS, Obergefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the due process clause of 18 the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as a font of substantive rights, a doctrine that 19 strays from the full meaning of the Constitutio… |
| WHEREAS, Obergefell's inversion of the original meaning of liberty 28 causes collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that 29 protect liberty, including religious liberty; and 30 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Windsor, 570 31 U.S. 744 (2013), that the definition of marriage is "an area that has long 32 been regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States," meaning that 33 Idaho, and not the Supreme Court, has the right to regulate marriage for its 34 citizens; and 35 WHEREAS, Obergefell requires states to issue marriage licenses to same- 36 sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages in complete contravention of 37 their own stat… | WHEREAS, Obergefell's inversion of the original meaning of liberty causes collateral 1 damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that protect liberty, including religious 2 liberty; and 3 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court recognized in the United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 4 (2013), that the definition of marriage is "an area that has long been regarded as a virtually 5 exclusive province of the States," meaning that South Dakota, and not the Supreme Court, 6 has the right to regulate marriage for its citizens; and 7 WHEREAS, Obergefell requires states to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples and 8 to recognize same-sex marriages in complete contravention of their own state co… |
| and 41 WHEREAS, Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected this definition 42 of marriage | and 16 WHEREAS, Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected this definition of marriage |
| in favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key 1 clauses within the Constitution and our nation's legal and cultural | in favor 17 of a novel, flawed interpretation of key clauses within the Constitution and our nation's legal 18 and cultural |
| justices in the majority ruling, Justices Ruth Bader Gins- 9 burg and Elena Kagan, had previously officiated same-sex weddings, and thus 10 were not impartial triers of | Justices in the 20 majority ruling, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, had previously officiated 21 same-sex weddings, and thus were not impartial triers of |
| and 12 WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only legislatures elected 13 by the people may pass laws, Obergefell is an illegitimate overreach; and | and 23 WHEREAS, since court rulings are not laws and only legislatures elected by the people 24 may pass laws, Obergefell is an illegitimate overreach; and |