Compare ID HJM 17 (2026) and SD HCR 6012 (2025)

The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.

250 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.

This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.

ID HJM 17 (2026)SD HCR 6012 (2025)
WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in 6 Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution 7 of the United States and the principles upon which the United States is es- 8 tablished; and 9 WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from 10 governmental action, not as a right to a particular governmentalWHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. 3 Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution of the United States and the 4 principles upon which the United States is established; and 5 WHEREAS, liberty has long been understood as individual freedom from governmental 6 action, not as a right to a particular governmental
Obergefell invokes a definition of "liberty" that theObergefell invokes a definition of "liberty" that the
would not have recognized, rejecting the idea captured in the Declaration 14 of Independence that human dignity is innate, and instead suggesting that it 15 comes from the government; and 16 WHEREAS, when the framers proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence 17 that "all men are created equal" and "endowed by their Creator with certain 18 unalienable Rights," they referred to a vision of mankind in which all humans 19 are created in the image of God andwould not have recognized, rejecting the idea captured in the Declaration of 9 Independence that human dignity is innate, and instead suggested that it comes from the 10 government; and 11 WHEREAS, when the founders proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence that all men 12 are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, they 13 referred to a vision of mankind in which all humans are created in the image of God and
Obergefell undermines this vision by declaring that citizens 21 must seek dignity from the state; and 22 WHEREAS, Obergefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due 23 Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the ConstitutionObergefell undermines this vision by declaring that citizens must 16 seek dignity from the state; and 17 WHEREAS, the ruling in Obergefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due 18 Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution
as a font of 24 substantive rights, a doctrine that strays from the full meaning of theas a 19 font of substantive rights, a doctrine that strays from the full meaning of the
and exalts judges at the expense of the people from whom theyand exalts judges at the expense of the people from whom they
causes collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that 29 protect liberty, including religious liberty; and 30 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Windsor, 570 31 U.S. 744 (2013), that the definition of marriage is "an area that has long 32 been regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States," meaning that 33 Idaho, and not the Supreme Court, has the right to regulate marriage for its 34 citizens; and 35 WHEREAS, Obergefell requires states to issue marriage licenses to same- 36 sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages in complete contravention of 37 their own state constitutions and the will of their voters, thus undermining 38 the…causes 1 collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that protect liberty, including 2 religious liberty; and 3 WHEREAS, the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 4 (2013), that the definition of marriage is an area that has long been regarded as a virtually 5 exclusive province of the States, meaning that South Dakota, and not the Supreme Court, 6 has the right to regulate marriage for its citizens; and 7 WHEREAS, the ruling in Obergefell requires states to issue marriage licenses to same sex 8 couples and to recognize same-sex marriages in complete contravention of their own state 9 constitutions and the will of their voters, thus underminin…
Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected this definition 42 of marriageObergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected this definition of 15 marriage
in favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key 1 clauses within the Constitutionin favor of a novel, flawed interpretation of key clauses within the Constitution
justices in the majority ruling, Justices Ruth Bader Gins- 9 burg and Elena Kagan, had previously officiated same-sex weddings, and thus 10 were not impartial triers ofJustices in the majority ruling, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, had previously 19 officiated same-sex weddings, and thus were not impartial triers of
union of one man and 17 one woman; andunion of one 27 man and one woman; and