Compare MN SF 1975 (2009) and MN SF 1976 (2009)

The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.

168 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.

This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.

MN SF 1975 (2009)MN SF 1976 (2009)
S.F. No. 1975, as introduced - 86th Legislative Session (2009-2010) [09-2347] A bill for an act 1.1 relating to the Minnesota Constitution; proposing an amendment to the 1.2 Minnesota Constitution, article XIII, by adding a section; providing that a 1.3 marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall 1.4 be valid or recognized in Minnesota. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROPOSED. 1.7 An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution is proposed to the people. If the 1.8 amendment is adopted, a section shall be added to article XIII, to read: 1.9 Sec. 13. A marriage between a man and a woman is…S.F. No. 1976, as introduced - 86th Legislative Session (2009-2010) [09-2346] A bill for an act 1.1 relating to the Minnesota Constitution; proposing an amendment to the 1.2 Minnesota Constitution, article XIII, by adding a section; providing that a 1.3 marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall 1.4 be valid or recognized in Minnesota. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROPOSED. 1.7 An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution is proposed to the people. If the 1.8 amendment is adopted, a section shall be added to article XIII, to read: 1.9 Sec. 13. A marriage between a man and a woman is…