Compare NJ S 1331 (2024) and NJ S 589 (2022)

The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.

1,397 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.

This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.

NJ S 1331 (2024)NJ S 589 (2022)
LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2024 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator MICHAEL L. TESTA, JR. District 1 (Atlantic, Cape May and Cumberland) Senator JAMES W. HOLZAPFEL DistrictLEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2022 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator MICHAEL L. TESTA, JR. District 1 (Atlantic, Cape May and Cumberland) Senator JAMES W. HOLZAPFEL District
SYNOPSIS "Fairness in Women's Sports Act." CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel. An Act concerning student participation in school-sanctioned sporting events and supplementing chapter 11 of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. The Legislature finds and declares that: a. In United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S.515, 533 (1996), the Supreme Court noted that there are "inherent differences between men and women," and these differences "remain cause for celebration, but not for denigration of the members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual's opport…SYNOPSIS "Fairness in Women's Sports Act." CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel. An Act concerning student participation in school-sanctioned sporting events and supplementing chapter 11 of Title 18A of the New Jersey Statutes. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. The Legislature finds and declares that: a. In United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S.515, 533 (1996), the Supreme Court noted that there are "inherent differences between men and women," and these differences "remain cause for celebration, but not for denigration of the members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual's opport…