Compare UT HB 527 (2024) and UT HB 95 (2026)

The introduced text of these two bills, side by side, with the wording they share.

689 shared 8-word phrases found in the introduced text of these two bills.

This highlights wording the two bills share in their introduced text. A shared passage may include text that both bills quote from the same existing law, not only language either one drafted. A match shows that the texts overlap; it does not show who drafted a bill, and filing order alone does not show which bill copied which.

UT HB 527 (2024)UT HB 95 (2026)
H.B. 527 1 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE GENDER-SPECIFIC LANGUAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS 3 2024 GENERAL SESSION 4 STATE OF UTAH 5 Chief Sponsor: Tim Jimenez 6 Senate Sponsor: ____________ 7 8 LONG TITLE 9 General Description: 10 This bill prohibits certain employment action against a public employeeH.B. 95 1 Public Employee Gender-specific Language Requirements 2026 GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Nicholeen P. Peck Senate Sponsor: 2 3 LONG TITLE 4 General Description: 5 This bill prohibits certain employment action against a public employee
Highlighted Provisions: 12 This bill: 13 < prohibits the State Board of EducationHighlighted Provisions: 8 This bill: 9 ▸ prohibits the State Board of Education
or a public employer from taking 14 disciplinary action against an employee for using gender-specific language in 15 certain circumstances; 16 < requires a public employer that has a rule or policy requiring an employee to use 17 gender-specific language to accommodate another individual to exempt the 18 employee from disciplinary action in certain circumstances; and 19 < makes technical changes. 20 Money Appropriated in this Bill: 21 None 22 Other Special Clausesor a public employer 10 from taking disciplinary action against an employee for using gender-specific language 11 in certain circumstances; 12 ▸ requires a public employer that has a rule or policy requiring an employee to use 13 gender-specific language to accommodate another individual to exempt the employee 14 from disciplinary action in certain circumstances; and 15 ▸ makes technical changes. 16 Money Appropriated in this Bill: 17 None 18 Other Special Clauses
Utah Code Annotated 1953 29 30 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: 31 Section 1. Section 53G-10-206 is amended to read: 32 53G-10-206. Educational freedom. 33 (1) As used in this section: 34 (a) (i) "Administrative personnel" means any LEA or state board staff personnel whoUtah Code Annotated 1953 25 26 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: 27 Section 1. Section 53G-10-206 is amended to read: 28 53G-10-206 . Educational freedom. 29 (1) As used in this section: 30 (a)(i) "Administrative personnel" means any LEA or state board staff personnel who
have system-wide, LEA-wide, or school-wide functions and who perform management 36 activities, including: 37 (A) developing broad policies for LEA or state-level boards; and 38 (B) executing developed policies through the direction of personnel at any level within 39 the state or LEA. 40 (ii) "Administrative personnel" includes state, LEA, or school superintendents, 41 assistant superintendents, deputy superintendents, school principals, assistant principals, 42 directors, executive directors, network directors, cabinet members, subject area directors, grant 43 coordinators, specialty directors, career center directors, educational specialists, technology 44 personnel, technology administra…have system-wide, LEA-wide, or school-wide functions and who perform 32 management activities, including: 33 (A) developing broad policies for LEA or state-level boards; and 34 (B) executing developed policies through the direction of personnel at any level 35 within the state or LEA. 36 (ii) "Administrative personnel" includes state, LEA, or school superintendents, 37 assistant superintendents, deputy superintendents, school principals, assistant 38 principals, directors, executive directors, network directors, cabinet members, 39 subject area directors, grant coordinators, specialty directors, career center 40 directors, educational specialists, technology personnel, technology 41 adminis…
a). 95 (5) The state board and state superintendent may not develop or continue to use core 96 standards under Section 53E-3-301 or professional learning that are inconsistent with the 97 principles described in Subsection (2)(a). 98 Section 2. Section 67-21-3.3 is enacted to read: 99 67-21-3.3. Gender-specific language preference -- Employer action. 100 (1) An employer may not pursue disciplinary action against an employeeA-5-112. 97 (4) The state board and state superintendent may not develop or continue to use core 98 standards under Section 53E-3-301 or professional learning that are inconsistent with the - 3 - H.B. 95 12-29 11:18 99 principles described in Subsection (2)(a). 100 Section 2. Section 67-21-3.3 is enacted to read: 101 67-21-3.3 . Gender-specific language preference -- Employer action. 102 (1) An employer may not pursue disciplinary action against an employee
that conflicts with the individual's personal gender-specific language 103 preferencethat conflicts with the individual's personal gender-specific language preference
If an employer implements a rule or policy that requires an employee to use 108 gender-specific language to accommodate another individual's personal gender-specific 109 language preference, theIf an employer implements a rule or policy that requires an employee to use 111 gender-specific language to accommodate another individual's personal gender-specific 112 language preference, the
from disciplinary action an 110 employee described in Subsectionfrom disciplinary action an employee 114 described in Subsection
in writing of the exemptions described in this section. 113 Section 3. Effective date. 114 This bill takes effect onin writing of the exemptions described in this section. 116 Section 3. Effective Date. 117 This bill takes effect on