online opt-in

Civiqs

Daily Kos/Civiqs National Politics Survey, April 2022 · Apr 23–26, 2022 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Civiqs independent
Sponsor
Daily Kos
Commissioned by
Daily Kos
Fielded
Apr 23–26, 2022
Population
registered voters
Sample size
1,248
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
Civiqs research panel
Mode
online - selected members of the Civiqs research panel emailed a personalized survey link
Margin of error
+/- 2.8% at the 95% confidence level, accounting for the design effect
Weighting
weighted by age, race, gender, education, party identification, and region to be representative of the population of registered voters in the United States
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Toplines and Democrat/Republican/Independent crosstabs read directly from the Civiqs/Daily Kos April 2022 banner book PDF (33 pp.), Q1-Q5, pages 3-4 and 6-13. This survey opens with a five-item transgender and LGBT block, the densest trans battery in the Daily Kos/Civiqs monthly series. Gender, age and region crosstab columns exist in the PDF but were column-scrambled by text extraction and are not transcribed here.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (5)

Political salience4-point scalein a trend series
personal importance of issues involving transgender Americans

Are issues involving transgender Americans important to you?

No, not important at all
29%
Yes, very important
26%
Yes, somewhat important
26%
No, not very important
17%
Unsure
2%

Wording notes: direction of importance is not specified - a respondent hostile to trans rights and one supportive of them both answer very important

neutral — balanced four-point importance scale with symmetric yes/no stems; measures salience only, not direction

Subgroup figures (15)

party

GroupYes, very importantYes, somewhat importantNo, not very importantNo, not important at allUnsure
Democrat36%36%15%11%2%
Republican17%18%16%47%1%
Independent24%22%21%30%3%
General acceptanceforced choicein a trend series
whether trans people face discrimination or seek special treatment

Which of the following statements comes closest to your view of transgender people in the United States today? [Transgender people are facing discrimination, harassment, and attacks on their rights / Transgender people already have equal rights and want to receive special treatment / Neither / Unsure]

Transgender people are facing discrimination, harassment, and attacks on their rights
43%
Transgender people already have equal rights and want to receive special treatment
41%
Neither
13%
Unsure
3%

Wording notes: special treatment is a hostile frame drawn from opposition rhetoric | the two statements are not logical complements - one describes treatment received, the other imputes motive | statements are of unequal length and specificity

loaded_terms — want to receive special treatment imputes motive and imports a movement-conservative frame; the paired alternative describes conditions rather than motives, so the two options are not symmetric even though both are affirmatively stated

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupTransgender people are facing discrimination, harassment, and attacks on their rightsTransgender people already have equal rights and want to receive special treatmentNeitherUnsure
Democrat83%10%5%2%
Republican5%75%18%2%
Independent34%44%16%6%
Youth medical careforced choicein a trend series
whether state bans on youth gender-affirming care are helping or hurting

As you may know, there is legislation being passed or considered in many states

As you may know, there is legislation being passed or considered in many states that would prevent transgender youth from receiving gender-affirming medical care. Do you think this legislation is helping or hurting?

Hurting
48%
Helping
35%
Neither helping nor hurting
9%
Unsure
8%

Wording notes: helping or hurting leaves the object ambiguous - helping whom | As you may know presumes awareness of the legislation | does not name specific interventions

unclear — the helping/hurting frame is symmetric but leaves the referent unspecified, so respondents may be evaluating effects on trans youth, on children generally, or on the state; the ambiguity is the notable design feature rather than a directional tilt

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupHelpingHurtingNeither helping nor hurtingUnsure
Democrat7%82%5%6%
Republican66%14%11%8%
Independent39%41%11%9%
Sportsforced choicein a trend series
whether state bans on trans youth school sports participation are helping or hurting

As you may know, there is legislation being passed or considered in many states

As you may know, there is legislation being passed or considered in many states that would prevent transgender youth from participating on school sports teams that align with their gender identity. Do you think this legislation is helping or hurting?

Helping
45%
Hurting
36%
Neither helping nor hurting
7%
Unsure
11%

Wording notes: helping or hurting leaves the object ambiguous | As you may know presumes awareness of the legislation | deliberately parallel to Q3 so the two policy areas can be compared on identical wording

unclear — same ambiguity as Q3; the value of the pair is that wording is held constant across the two policy domains, isolating the domain effect - helping is 35% on medical care and 45% on sports in the same sample

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupHelpingHurtingNeither helping nor hurtingUnsure
Democrat10%66%8%17%
Republican81%8%6%5%
Independent53%29%8%11%
Books & mediaotherin a trend series
LGBT-inclusive books in local school classrooms and libraries

Do you believe that classrooms and libraries in your local school district should contain books with characters who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender?

Yes
48%
No
38%
Yes, but fewer than there are now
7%
Unsure
7%

Wording notes: offers an asymmetric middle option (Yes, but fewer than there are now) with no matching Yes, but more | localized to your local school district | bundles transgender with gay, lesbian and bisexual characters

tilts_restrictive — the only qualified option offered is a restrictive one (fewer than there are now); no expansive middle option is offered, so the response set is asymmetric

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupYesNoYes, but fewer than there are nowUnsure
Democrat83%11%3%4%
Republican11%70%11%8%
Independent45%38%8%10%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →