online opt-in
Civiqs
Daily Kos/Civiqs National Politics Survey, July 2022 · Jul 16–19, 2022 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- Civiqs independent
- Sponsor
- Daily Kos
- Commissioned by
- Daily Kos
- Fielded
- Jul 16–19, 2022
- Population
- registered voters
- Sample size
- 1,310
- Sample frame
- online opt-in
- Panel
- Civiqs research panel
- Mode
- online - selected members of the Civiqs research panel emailed a personalized survey link
- Margin of error
- +/- 2.8% at the 95% confidence level, accounting for the design effect
- Weighting
- weighted by age, race, gender, education, party identification, and region to be representative of the population of registered voters in the United States
- Geography
- US national
Sources
Verification note. Toplines and Democrat/Republican/Independent crosstabs read directly from the Civiqs/Daily Kos July 2022 banner book PDF (32 pp.), Q2 and Q10, pages 4-5 and 19. Q3 (books by and about people of color) and Q11 (feminism) are out of scope.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (2)
LGBT-inclusive books in local school classrooms and libraries
Do you believe that classrooms and libraries in your local school district should contain books with characters who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender?
Yes
48%
No
35%
Yes, but fewer than there are now
9%
Unsure
8%
Wording notes: offers an asymmetric middle option (Yes, but fewer than there are now) with no matching Yes, but more | localized to your local school district | bundles transgender with gay, lesbian and bisexual characters
tilts_restrictive — the only qualified option offered is a restrictive one (fewer than there are now); no expansive middle option is offered, so the response set is asymmetric
Subgroup figures (12)
employer-paid out-of-state travel for gender-affirming care
Some states have restricted access to gender-affirming care for transgender individuals.
Some states have restricted access to gender-affirming care for transgender individuals. Do you support or oppose employers in those states offering paid travel expenses for workers seeking gender-affirming care for themselves or their children out of state?
Wording notes: double-barreled: bundles care for adult workers with care for their children | asked in the same battery as a parallel post-Dobbs abortion-travel item, importing that frame | preamble states the restriction as established fact
double_barreled — the item asks about care for themselves or their children in one stem, merging adult access with minor access, so the resulting 46% combined support cannot be attributed to either alone; the near-absence of somewhat responses (8% and 9%) suggests respondents treated it as a polarized yes/no
Subgroup figures (15)