probability RDD

CNN

CNN/ORC Poll 6, April-May 2016 · Apr 28, 2016 – May 2016 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
CNN media
Sponsor
CNN
Commissioned by
CNN
Fielded
Apr 28, 2016 – May 2016
Population
adults
Sample size
1,001
Sample frame
probability RDD
Mode
telephone - live interviewers calling both landline and cell phones
Margin of error
plus or minus 3 percentage points
Weighting
weighted to national Census figures for gender, race, age, education, region of country, and telephone usage
Geography
US national
Base notes
601 landline and 400 cell phone interviews; the sample also includes 890 registered voters (+/- 3.5 points)

Sources

Verification note. Verbatim wording, totals and party breaks read from PollingReport.com's transcription of the CNN/ORC release. The original CNN topline PDF could not be located (CNN's pre-2018 poll PDFs are no longer served from cdn.cnn.com and CDX enumeration timed out), so the pollster's own release was not reached directly. || Wording, toplines, methodology and full crosstabs read directly from the CNN/ORC release PDF (downloaded and text-extracted locally). This is the poll Gallup singled out as producing a very different answer from its own forced-choice restroom item fielded the same week - the two are a natural question-wording experiment on the same event.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (3)

Bathrooms & facilitiesfavor/opposein a trend series
laws requiring facility use matching gender at birth

Overall, would you say you favor or oppose laws that require transgender individuals to use facilities that correspond to their gender at birth rather than their gender identity?

Favor 38%57% Oppose

Wording notes: uses 'gender at birth' contrasted with 'gender identity' | asks about the restrictive law rather than about access

neutral — Standard favor/oppose on a named policy; both 'gender at birth' and 'gender identity' are named, so the contrast is symmetric.

Subgroup figures (32)

party

GroupFavorOpposeStrongly favorSomewhat favorSomewhat opposeStrongly oppose
Democrats32%62%————
Independents35%58%————
Republicans48%48%————
Democrat——19%13%20%42%
Independent——23%12%18%40%
Republican——34%14%17%31%

ideology

GroupStrongly favorStrongly oppose
Liberal12%60%
Moderate24%32%
Conservative36%31%

gender

GroupStrongly favorStrongly oppose
Men25%35%
Women24%42%

race

GroupStrongly favorStrongly oppose
White24%42%
Non-White25%33%
Nondiscriminationfavor/opposein a trend series
equal-protection laws for transgender people in jobs, housing, public accommodations

Overall, do you favor or oppose laws that guarantee equal protection for transgender people in jobs, housing and public accommodations?

Favor 75%23% Oppose

Wording notes: 'guarantee equal protection' is a positively valenced framing

tilts_affirming — 'guarantee equal protection' invokes a widely endorsed constitutional value, which tends to lift support relative to more concrete policy descriptions; the favor/oppose structure itself is balanced.

Subgroup figures (15)

party

GroupFavorOpposeFavor laws, equal protectionOppose laws, equal protection
Democrats87%11%——
Independents75%23%——
Republicans60%38%——
Democrat——87%11%
Independent——75%23%
Republican——60%38%

ideology

GroupFavor laws, equal protection
Liberal90%
Moderate79%
Conservative58%
Contact & populationotherin a trend series
knowing a transgender family member or close friend

Do you happen to have a family member or close friend who is transgender?

No
85%
Yes
14%
Unsure
1%

Wording notes: restricts to family member or close friend, excluding coworkers and acquaintances

neutral — Simple factual self-report; the narrow 'family member or close friend' frame yields lower contact estimates than broader wordings used by other pollsters.

Subgroup figures (10)

party

GroupYes
Democrat19%
Independent16%
Republican5%

ideology

GroupYes
Liberal20%
Moderate14%
Conservative9%

gender

GroupYes
Men11%
Women17%

race

GroupYes
White10%
Non-White19%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →