online opt-in

Cooperative Election Study (CES)

Cooperative Election Study (CES) 2020 Common Content · Sep 29, 2020 – Dec 14, 2020 · US national (large enough for state-level estimates)

Methodology

Pollster
Cooperative Election Study (CES) academic
Sponsor
Harvard University (CES/CCES consortium of university research teams)
Fielded
Sep 29, 2020 – Dec 14, 2020
Population
adults
Sample size
61,000
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
YouGov (with Disqo, Prodege and Generation Lab panels in some years)
Mode
online - YouGov matched random sample: a target sample is drawn from the American Community Survey / Current Population Survey frame and matched to YouGov opt-in panelists, then weighted by propensity score and raked
Margin of error
not disclosed
Weighting
commonweight (2017: weights_common) - propensity-score matched sample weighted and raked to age, gender, education, race, Hispanic origin, voter registration status and presidential vote
Geography
US national (large enough for state-level estimates)
Base notes
Pre-election wave 29 Sep - 2 Nov 2020; post-election wave 8 Nov - 14 Dec 2020. CC20_355d was on the pre-election wave.

Sources

Verification note. Wording copied verbatim from CES20_Common_pre_qx.pdf (grid CC20_355, row CC20_355d). Weighted percentages computed by this agent from the public-use microdata CES20_Common_OUTPUT_vv.csv (n=61,000) using the released weight commonweight; the raw unweighted counts (18,134 support / 42,487 oppose / N 60,621) match the counts published in 'CCES Guide 2020.pdf' exactly, which cross-validates the extraction.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (2)

Military servicesupport/opposein a trend series
CES variable CC20_355d - ban transgender people in the military (pre-election wave)

For each of the following tell us whether you support or oppose these decisions.

Ban Transgender People in the Military

Support 35%65% Oppose

Wording notes: bare policy label | no middle or don't-know option | embedded in an executive-orders battery

neutral — plain policy label; battery framing is the main caveat

Subgroup figures (6)

party

GroupSupportOppose
Democrat13.1%86.9%
Republican62.7%37.3%
Independent33.9%66.1%
Contact & populationotherin a trend series
CES demographic variable measuring transgender status of the respondent

Have you ever undergone any part of a process (including any thought or action) to change your gender / perceived gender from the one you were assigned at birth? This may include steps such as changing the type of clothes you wear, name you are known by or undergoing surgery.

No
94.8%
Prefer not to say
2.8%
Yes
2.4%

Wording notes: extremely broad wording ('any thought or action')

unclear — The pre-2021 CCES wording asks whether the respondent has 'ever undergone any part of a process (including any thought or action)' to change their gender, which is far broader than transgender self-identification and produces prevalence estimates of 2-4%, several times higher than every other national survey. It should not be read as a transgender population estimate.

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →