adding sexual orientation and gender identity to Idaho's nondiscrimination law (the 'Add the Words' campaign)
Should it be against state law to discriminate against gays, lesbians and transgender people in housing, employment and business?
Wording reconstructed from: Spokesman-Review description of the Dan Jones & Associates item; literal wording not published
Should be illegal
67%
Should not be illegal
27%
Don't know
6%
Wording notes: bundles three protected domains (housing, employment, business) into one item | bundles sexual orientation and gender identity, so trans-specific opinion cannot be isolated
double_barreled — the item covers three separate domains of protection and two distinct protected classes at once, so a respondent who supports employment but not housing protection, or orientation but not gender identity, has no way to register that
Subgroup figures (10)
party
| Group | Should be illegal |
|---|---|
| Republicans | 58% |
| Democrats | 87% |
| Independents | 72% |
ideology
| Group | Should be illegal |
|---|---|
| Very conservative | 52% |
religion
| Group | Should be illegal |
|---|---|
| Active Latter-day Saints | 64% |
| Less active Latter-day Saints | 80% |
| Catholics | 71% |
| Protestants | 57% |
| Other denominations | 73% |
| No religious affiliation | 75% |