Echelon Insights December 2024 Voter Omnibus (PUCK) · Dec 9–12, 2024 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- Echelon Insights commercial
- Sponsor
- Echelon Insights
- Commissioned by
- Puck
- Fielded
- Dec 9–12, 2024
- Population
- likely voters
- Sample size
- 1,001
- Sample frame
- online opt-in
- Mode
- online sample matched to the L2 voter file
- Margin of error
- ±3.6 percentage points
- Weighting
- not stated on the topline beyond the L2 voter-file match
- Geography
- US national
- Base notes
- The race-and-gender-identity items were asked only of self-identified Democrats and Democratic leaners (n=442)
Sources
Verification note. Question wording and percentages transcribed directly from the Echelon Insights Verified Voter Omnibus topline PDF (page rendered and read where the extracted text mis-ordered the grid). Both items reach this database only because they name 'gender identity' explicitly; neither is an attitude item toward transgender people, and both were asked ONLY of Democrats and Democratic leaners, so there is no full-sample total to record. Echelon's topline gives field dates, n and MoE but no weighting statement.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
whether Democrats should focus less on issues of race and gender identity
[If QPartyID = 2. Democrat or QPartyLeanView = 2. Democrats, Ask] For each of the following suggestions, please indicate whether you think the Democratic Party should or should not pursue this approach to improve its future performance. [RANDOMIZE ROWS] [RANDOMIZE 1-2] [DISPLAY AS GRID]
Democrats should focus less on issues of race and gender identity
Wording notes: asked only of Democrats and Democratic leaners, so it measures intra-party strategy, not public opinion on trans people | bundles race and gender identity into a single indivisible item | the battery frames every row as a remedy for the party's 'defeat in the presidential election', which pre-loads the premise that current positioning failed | 'issues of race and gender identity' is a euphemism that never names any specific policy
double_barreled — a single Should/Should not cannot separate a respondent's view on race from their view on gender identity, and the battery's framing as post-defeat course correction pushes toward endorsing any proposed change
Subgroup figures (3)
