online opt-in

Echelon Insights

Echelon Insights June 2025 Verified Voter Omnibus · Jun 12–17, 2025 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Echelon Insights commercial
Sponsor
Echelon Insights
Fielded
Jun 12–17, 2025
Population
likely voters
Sample size
982
Sample frame
online opt-in
Mode
online sample matched to the L2 voter file
Margin of error
±3.8 percentage points
Weighting
not stated on the public topline beyond the voter-file match
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Wording and percentages transcribed directly from the Echelon Insights Verified Voter Omnibus topline PDF harvested from echeloninsights.com. Net figures and component shares were cross-checked against each other (the two 'strongly/somewhat' components sum to the printed net) to confirm the column alignment survived PDF text extraction. Echelon's public toplines carry field dates, n and margin of error but no weighting statement and no party crosstabs; the separately published crosstab decks were not parsed for this sweep.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Sportsforced choicein a trend series
paired-statement choice on whether trans athletes may play on teams matching gender identity

Paired-statement battery: respondents chose which of two statements they agreed with and how strongly.

1. Transgender athletes should be able to play on sports teams that match their current gender identity / 2. Transgender athletes should only be allowed to play on sports teams that match their birth gender

Strongly/somewhat agree with Option 2 (teams matching birth gender)
65%
Strongly agree with Option 2
54%
Strongly/somewhat agree with Option 1 (teams matching current gender identity)
27%
Strongly agree with Option 1
16%
Somewhat agree with Option 1
11%
Somewhat agree with Option 2
11%
Unsure
9%

Wording notes: paired-statement forced choice with no middle option, so respondents who would restrict some levels of competition but not others must pick a side | 'birth gender' rather than 'birth sex' - contested, but symmetric with 'current gender identity' | no age, sport or level of competition specified | embedded in a long ideological paired-statement battery covering abortion, guns, immigration, hate speech and policing, which invites answering by ideological identity rather than by considering the specific case

neutral — both alternatives are stated in full and in parallel and an Unsure option is offered, which is a fair design; the item's main distortion is contextual - it is one row of an ideological sorting battery, so it measures ideological placement as much as considered opinion on athletics

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →