online opt-in

Hart Research Associates

Hart Research Associates national survey for HRC - Americans' Views on the Equality Act · Mar 2021 – Mar 15, 2021 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Hart Research Associates partisan_d
Sponsor
Human Rights Campaign
Commissioned by
Human Rights Campaign
Fielded
Mar 2021 – Mar 15, 2021
Population
voters
Sample size
1,005
Sample frame
online opt-in
Mode
online - national survey of voters
Margin of error
credibility interval +/-3.1% for the full sample, with higher tolerances for subgroups
Weighting
not disclosed in the memo
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. WORDING RECOVERY SWEEP. Hart's memo quotes verbatim the full description of the legislation that respondents read before answering. The database previously carried a one-line reconstruction from HRC's press release. NOTE ON DATE: Hart states the survey ran March 12-15, 2021; the database's field_start of 2021-03-01 is retained here so the merge updates rather than duplicates.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Nondiscriminationfavor/opposein a trend series
federal Equality Act after an informative description

The Equality Act would add to existing laws that currently protect people based on race, sex, religion, and other characteristics to include sexual orientation and gender identity. This law would ensure that LGBTQ people are protected from discrimination in key areas of life, including employment, housing, credit, education, and jury service. And it would also add protections based on sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity to use of public spaces and services and federally funded programs. The Equality Act would update current laws to prevent services that are open to the public, such as retail stores, banks, legal services, and transportation services, from refusing service for LGBTQ people. It prevents businesses from using religious objections as a basis for refusing service to LGBTQ people.

Strongly favor
41%
Favor (net) 70%

Wording notes: three-paragraph one-sided description read before the question | no counter-argument or cost/objection presented | sponsored by an advocacy organization that supports the bill

tilts_affirming — the description is an advocacy summary: it lists benefits and protections, names no trade-offs, and pre-empts the leading objection (religious refusal) by framing it as businesses 'using religious objections as a basis for refusing service'. Measured support of 70% should be read as support-after-persuasion.

Subgroup figures (7)

party

GroupFavor (net)Oppose (net)
Democrats88%12%
Independents74%26%
Republicans50%50%

religion

GroupFavor (net)
White evangelicals50%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →