online opt-in

Harvard CAPS/Harris

Monthly Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll: May 2022 · May 18–19, 2022 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Harvard CAPS/Harris commercial
Sponsor
Harvard University Center for American Political Studies (Harvard CAPS) and The Harris Poll
Fielded
May 18–19, 2022
Population
registered voters
Sample size
1,963
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
The Harris Poll online panel
Mode
online survey, Harris Poll online panel
Margin of error
not disclosed
Weighting
weighted for age within gender, region, race/ethnicity, marital status, household size, income, employment, political party, political ideology, and education
Geography
US national
Base notes
Unweighted base 1,963; weighted base 1,959.

Sources

Verification note. Wording and percentages read directly from the Harvard CAPS-Harris May 2022 topline PDF, Tables 128-131.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (4)

Pronouns & languageforced choicein a trend series
kids choosing their own pronouns

Do you think that kids should be able to pick their pronouns - he, she or they - or do you think they should be called by their sex?

Called by their sex
59%
Kids should be able to pick their pronouns
41%

Wording notes: no age specified for 'kids' | no 'not sure' option

neutral — both alternatives stated in the stem in comparable language; the absence of an age qualifier is the main ambiguity

Pronouns & languageforced choice
pronoun choice as anti-discrimination vs confusing kids

Is allowing kids to pick their own pronouns a move that prevents discrimination against transgender students or do you think it is excessive measure that does more to confuse kids about their sex?

Confuses kids
60%
Prevents discrimination
40%

Wording notes: the restrictive option embeds two assertions ('excessive measure' and 'confuse kids') | no 'not sure' option | grammatical error 'it is excessive measure'

double_barreled — the second option is double-barreled - a respondent who thinks pronoun choice is excessive but not confusing, or confusing but not excessive, has no clean answer, while the first option is a single clean claim

Pronouns & languageforced choice
teachers required to use preferred pronouns

Do you think teachers should be required to use pronouns that kids say they want used under penalty of losing their job or should teachers have discretion to use pronouns as they see appropriate?

Teachers should have discretion
63%
Teacher should be required to use kids' preferred pronouns
37%

Wording notes: 'under penalty of losing their job' attaches a maximal sanction to the affirming option only | no 'not sure' option

tilts_restrictive — the affirming option is loaded with a termination penalty that no widely-enacted policy imposes, while the restrictive option is softened to 'discretion... as they see appropriate'; the asymmetry alone plausibly moves the result several points

Pronouns & languageforced choice
misgendering as illegal discrimination

Do you think it should be classified as illegal discrimination if you fail to use someone's selected pronouns or should that not be illegal?

Not illegal
73%
Illegal discrimination
27%

Wording notes: 'fail to use' is neutral as to intent - it covers both accident and deliberate refusal | no 'not sure' option

tilts_restrictive — by using 'fail to use' rather than 'refuse to use' the item sweeps in inadvertent error, making the affirming position sound like criminalizing mistakes; the 73% 'not illegal' figure should not be read as opposition to workplace harassment protections

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →