online opt-in

Harvard CAPS/Harris

Monthly Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll: July 2024 · Jul 26–28, 2024 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Harvard CAPS/Harris commercial
Sponsor
Harvard University Center for American Political Studies (Harvard CAPS) and The Harris Poll
Fielded
Jul 26–28, 2024
Population
registered voters
Sample size
2,196
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
The Harris Poll online panel
Mode
online survey, Harris Poll online panel
Margin of error
not disclosed
Weighting
weighted for age within gender, region, race/ethnicity, marital status, household size, income, employment, political party, political ideology, and education
Geography
US national
Base notes
Split-sample battery: the two items below were each asked of roughly half the sample (unweighted bases 1,088 and 1,093).

Sources

Verification note. Wording and percentages read directly from the Harvard CAPS-Harris July 2024 topline PDF, Tables 146-147. Both items were fielded on split samples ('Base: Respondents Split Across 16/17').

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

School policy4-point scale
cutting school funding over 'radical gender ideology'

Recently, the Republican Party released its policy platform on a variety of issues, some of which are below. Please indicate how strongly you support or oppose each of the following policy goals: Cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children

Support 62%38% Oppose

Wording notes: verbatim GOP platform language, presented as such | 'radical gender ideology' and 'inappropriate' are the platform's own pejoratives, carried into the stem | triple-barreled: CRT, gender ideology, and unspecified 'inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content'

loaded_terms — the item is explicitly a test of platform language rather than of policy, and HHP labels it as such; but because three distinct targets are bundled and each is described in the platform's own pejorative terms, the 62% support figure cannot be attributed to the gender-identity component

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →