online opt-in

Hobby School of Public Affairs

UH-TSU Texas Trends Survey 2021, Report One: Abortion and Transgender Athlete Policies · Oct 4–21, 2021 · Texas (statewide)

Methodology

Pollster
Hobby School of Public Affairs academic
Sponsor
Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston; Barbara Jordan - Mickey Leland School of Public Affairs, Texas Southern University
Fielded
Oct 4–21, 2021
Population
adults
Sample size
2,067
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
YouGov
Mode
online interviews fielded in English and Spanish through YouGov; respondents matched to a sampling frame on gender, age, race/ethnicity and education
Margin of error
confidence interval of +/- 2.2
Weighting
respondents matched to a sampling frame on gender, age, race/ethnicity and education to be representative of the Texas adult population
Geography
Texas (statewide)
Base notes
includes oversamples of Black and Latino Texans

Sources

Verification note. Text, Table 4 and the narrative subgroup figures were read directly from the Hobby School report PDF. The report describes the item rather than printing the literal questionnaire text, so question_text_verbatim is false. Subgroup support percentages are the collapsed strongly+somewhat support figures given in the report's narrative for Figure 9.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Sportsparaphrasedsupport/oppose
Texas HB 25 - requiring public school athletes to compete in sports associated with their biological sex

During the third special session of the Texas Legislature in 2021, House Bill 25 (HB 25) was passed, codifying existing protocols governing public high school and middle school athletics (that is University Interscholastic League, or UIL, athletics).

[Level of support for House Bill 25, legislation] which would require male Texas public high school and middle school students to compete only in sports associated with their biological sex, such that a transgender female (a biological male who identifies as female) would not be eligible to compete in athletics with biological females.

Wording reconstructed from: Description of the item printed in the Hobby School report; the literal questionnaire text is not reproduced in the report.

Support 128%55% Oppose

Wording notes: uses 'biological sex' and glosses transgender female as 'a biological male who identifies as female' | frames the law as 'codifying existing protocols', which minimizes the change

tilts_restrictive — the stem defines a transgender girl as 'a biological male', adopts the restrictive side's terminology throughout, and characterizes the new law as merely codifying existing practice

Subgroup figures (16)

party

GroupSupport (net, valid responses)
Republicans91%
Independents73%
Democrats48%

gender

GroupSupport (net, valid responses)
Men74%
Women65%

age

GroupSupport (net, valid responses)
Baby Boomers/Silent Generation82%
Generation X69%
Millennials63%
Generation Z54%

race

GroupSupport (net, valid responses)
White75%
Latino64%
Black63%

religion

GroupSupport (net, valid responses)
Religion very important79%
Religion somewhat important72%
Religion not too important56%
Religion not at all important54%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →