online opt-in

Ipsos

Ipsos What the Future: Gender (opt-in component, October 17-18, 2019) · Oct 17–18, 2019 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Ipsos commercial
Sponsor
Ipsos
Fielded
Oct 17–18, 2019
Population
men (adult men 18+); the trans-relevant battery was asked only of male respondents
Sample size
1,005
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
Ipsos online panel plus partner panels and river sampling
Mode
online - self-administered web survey; sample randomly drawn from Ipsos's online panel, partner online panel sources, and 'river' sampling; does not rely on a population frame in the traditional sense
Margin of error
Credibility interval of +/- 3.5 percentage points for all respondents; design-effect adjusted confidence interval +/- 5.0 points (n=1,005, DEFF=1.5). Ipsos does not publish a separate interval for the male subsample; at N=414 it would be materially wider.
Weighting
Raking-ratio calibration to U.S. population targets; post-hoc weights on gender, age, race/ethnicity, region and education
Geography
US national
Base notes
Full poll N=1,005 adults 18+; the 'spectrum of genders' battery recorded here was asked only of male respondents (N=414). All percentages below are among men.

Sources

Verification note. Extracted from the same 49-page Ipsos 'What the Future: Gender' topline PDF, which bundles four separate polls. This record covers the second poll (October 17-18, 2019), an online opt-in survey whose Q7 battery was asked only of men and concerns how men feel about the public conversation over non-binary gender. It is a genuinely unusual instrument - it measures perceived threat and exclusion among the group most often assumed to be driving backlash, rather than policy opinion. FRAME CAUTION: opt-in sample, male subsample of 414, credibility interval not margin of error.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Identity beliefs5-point scalein a trend series
men's reactions to the public conversation about non-binary gender - threat, exclusion, anger, learning

There is a national discussion going on about whether there are not just two genders (male and female) but if there are a spectrum of genders in between.

There is a national discussion going on about whether there are not just two genders (male and female) but if there are a spectrum of genders in between. How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding this conversation?

Wording notes: asked only of men - the design deliberately isolates male reaction rather than reporting a gender crosstab | the preamble presents the existence of the debate as fact without taking a side, but framing it as a 'national discussion' about 'whether' there are more than two genders does put the question of trans and non-binary existence up for public adjudication | the nine sub-items are asymmetric in valence: five are negative (attacked, annoyed/angry, values threatened, excluded, rights taken away, against religious beliefs), two positive (learned a lot, feel included), one neutral-positive (men have an important role) | no 'don't know' offered; large 'neither agree nor disagree' shares (21-43%)

unclear — The stem is even-handed, but the sub-item set is not balanced in valence - six of nine possible reactions are negative or grievance-framed, and only two invite a positive response. That imbalance means the battery is better read as a menu of grievance options than as a neutral inventory of reactions. Recorded in full because the results are substantively important: 44% of men agree they worry they will be attacked for saying what they think, 40% say the conversation makes them annoyed or angry, and 35% feel their values are threatened, while 36% say they have learned a lot from it.

Subgroup figures (18)

gender

GroupTotal agree (Net)Total disagree (Net)
Men - I feel men have an important role to play in this conversation64%8%
Men - I worry that if I say what I'm thinking, I will be attacked44%35%
Men - Hearing the conversation usually makes me annoyed or angry40%36%
Men - I have learned a lot from that conversation36%29%
Men - I feel like my values are being threatened35%40%
Men - I feel excluded from that conversation31%26%
Men - I feel this goes against my religious beliefs31%49%
Men - I worry that my rights are being taken away29%48%
Men - I feel included in that conversation27%34%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →