probability panel

Ipsos

College Student Views on Free Expression and Campus Speech 2022 (2021 fielding) · Jan 2021 – Dec 31, 2021 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Ipsos independent
Sponsor
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Commissioned by
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Fielded
Jan 2021 – Dec 31, 2021
Population
18- to 24-year-olds who are current college students or enrolled in some post-high-school education
Sample size
1,023
Sample frame
probability panel
Panel
Ipsos KnowledgePanel
Mode
online - Ipsos KnowledgePanel and youth panel
Margin of error
not disclosed
Weighting
not disclosed in the 2024 trend table
Geography
US national
Base notes
Exact 2021 field dates were not stated in the 2024 report used as the source for these trend figures.

Sources

Verification note. Percentages taken from the trend chart in the 2024 Knight-Ipsos report, which prints 2017/2021/2024 side by side. The 2021 report itself was not retrieved, so field dates, weighting and margin of error are unconfirmed; field_start/field_end are placeholders bounding the calendar year and date_precision is 'year'. The 2017 version of this item omitted the gender-identity definition and is therefore out of scope for this database.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Otherforced choicein a trend series
whether hate speech attacking people on the basis of gender identity (among other characteristics) should be protected by the First Amendment

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that hate speech - which attacks people based on their race, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation - is legally protected free speech.

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that hate speech - which attacks people based on their race, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation - is legally protected free speech. Do you think hate speech is a form of expression that should or should not be protected by the First Amendment?

No, should not be protected
47%
Yes, should be protected
42%
Skipped
12%

Wording notes: gender identity appears only inside the definition of hate speech | stem asserts the Supreme Court's holding before asking the opinion

loaded_terms — the preamble states the legal answer before asking the normative question

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →