online opt-in

Ipsos

Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2024 Global Survey (United States sample) · Feb 23, 2024 – Mar 8, 2024 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Ipsos commercial
Sponsor
Ipsos
Fielded
Feb 23, 2024 – Mar 8, 2024
Population
adults 18-74
Sample size
1,000
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
Ipsos Global Advisor
Mode
online, Ipsos Global Advisor platform
Margin of error
credibility interval of +/- 3.5 percentage points for a sample of 1,000
Weighting
weighted so the composition of each country's sample best reflects the demographic profile of the adult population according to the most recent census data
Geography
US national
Base notes
US sample is approximately 1,000 of 18,515 adults interviewed across 26 countries; US respondents aged 18-74

Sources

Verification note. US percentages for the 2024 wave were read from the trend columns of the Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2026 report PDF (each country row carries 2025, 2024 and 2023 agree/support values), cross-validated against the 2023 and 2025 report PDFs where those years overlap - every overlapping value matched exactly. Field dates and total N come from the Ipsos 2024 release page. The 2024 report PDF itself was not opened, so the 2024 disagree/oppose shares are not captured, only the agree/support share.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (7)

Nondiscriminationagree/disagreein a trend series
protection from discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Transgender people should be protected from discrimination in employment, housing, and access to businesses such as restaurants and stores

Strongly/somewhat agree
71%

Wording notes: agree/disagree format subject to acquiescence bias | agree share only for this wave

neutral — policy stated plainly

General acceptance4-point scalein a trend series
perceived discrimination faced by transgender people

In your opinion, how much discrimination do transgender people face in our society today?

A great deal/fair amount
67%

Wording notes: collapsed net only for this wave

neutral — standard perceived-discrimination scale

Youth medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
gender-affirming care for transgender teenagers with parental consent

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

With parental consent, transgender teenagers should be allowed to receive gender-affirming care (e.g., counseling and hormone replacement treatment)

Strongly/somewhat agree
43%

Wording notes: conditioned on parental consent | excludes surgery

tilts_affirming — parental-consent condition and omission of surgery make agreement easier than in typical US bans-on-minors items

Bathrooms & facilitiesagree/disagreein a trend series
access to single-sex facilities matching gender identity

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Transgender people should be allowed to use single-sex facilities (e.g., public restrooms) that correspond to the gender they identify with

Strongly/somewhat agree
41%

Wording notes: affirming direction is the agree pole

neutral — plainly stated access policy

Legal documents & IDsagree/disagreein a trend series
non-binary gender marker option on government-issued documents

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Government-issued documents such as passports should include an option other than "male" and "female" for people who do not identify as either

Strongly/somewhat agree
44%

Wording notes: about non-binary markers specifically

neutral — policy stated plainly

Adult medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
insurance coverage of gender transition costs

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Health insurance systems should cover the costs of gender transition no differently than the costs of other medical procedures

Strongly/somewhat agree
39%

Wording notes: parity framing

neutral — parity framing is a fair statement of the policy question

Sportssupport/opposein a trend series
transgender athletes competing according to gender identity

To what extent do you support or oppose the following?

Transgender athletes competing based on the gender they identify with rather than the sex assigned at birth

Strongly/somewhat support
21%

Wording notes: 'sex assigned at birth' vs 'gender they identify with' contrast | no sport, level of competition or age specified | lowest-support item in the whole Ipsos transgender battery in nearly every country

neutral — both poles of the contrast named and the support/oppose scale is symmetric; the abstraction (no sport or level specified) cuts both ways

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →