online opt-in

Ipsos

Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2024 (Global Advisor, 26 countries) · Feb 23, 2024 – Mar 8, 2024 · 26-country multinational (Ipsos Global Advisor)

Methodology

Pollster
Ipsos commercial
Sponsor
Ipsos
Fielded
Feb 23, 2024 – Mar 8, 2024
Population
adults
Sample size
18,515
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
Ipsos Global Advisor online panels
Mode
online self-completion via the Ipsos Global Advisor online survey platform
Margin of error
credibility interval: ±3.5 points for n=1,000; ±5.0 points for n=500
Weighting
Data weighted so the composition of each country's sample best reflects the demographic profile of the adult population according to the most recent census data
Geography
26-country multinational (Ipsos Global Advisor)
Base notes
Approximately 1,000 per country in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain and the U.S.; roughly 500 in the remaining markets. Ages 18-74 in Canada, Republic of Ireland, South Africa, Turkiye and the United States, 20-74 in Thailand, 21-74 in Singapore, 16-74 elsewhere.

Sources

Verification note. All figures read directly from the country-by-country chart slides (pp. 29-37) of the Ipsos LGBT+ Pride 2024 report PDF, extracted with pdftotext in reading order.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (6)

Nondiscriminationagree/disagreein a trend series
employment, housing and public accommodation protections for transgender people

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Transgender people should be protected from discrimination in employment, housing, and access to businesses such as restaurants and stores

Agree 72%17% Disagree

Wording notes: agree/disagree format is subject to acquiescence bias

neutral — single-statement agree/disagree; descriptive wording

Subgroup figures (10)

region

GroupAgreeDisagree
United States71%17%
Great Britain73%15%
Canada74%16%
Australia78%14%
Ireland79%14%
Youth medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
gender-affirming care for transgender teenagers with parental consent

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

With parental consent, transgender teenagers should be allowed to receive gender-affirming care (e.g., counselling and hormone replacement treatment)

Agree 55%30% Disagree

Wording notes: specifies parental consent | examples limit treatments to counselling and hormones

neutral — conditions are stated openly in the item

Subgroup figures (10)

region

GroupAgreeDisagree
United States43%43%
Great Britain44%38%
Canada48%36%
Australia56%32%
Ireland52%35%
Bathrooms & facilitiesagree/disagreein a trend series
single-sex facilities matching gender identity

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Transgender people should be allowed to use single-sex facilities (e.g., public restrooms) that correspond to the gender they identify with

Agree 50%35% Disagree

Wording notes: uses 'the gender they identify with'

neutral — descriptive statement of the affirming position without a stated counter-argument

Subgroup figures (10)

region

GroupAgreeDisagree
United States41%43%
Great Britain38%43%
Canada45%37%
Australia51%33%
Ireland46%39%
Legal documents & IDsagree/disagreein a trend series
non-binary option on government-issued documents

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Government-issued documents such as passports should include an option other than "male" and "female" for people who do not identify as either

Agree 49%36% Disagree

neutral — descriptive statement of the policy

Subgroup figures (10)

region

GroupAgreeDisagree
United States44%40%
Great Britain43%39%
Canada40%41%
Australia51%36%
Ireland50%37%
Adult medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
insurance coverage of gender transition costs

How much do you agree or disagree with the following?

Health insurance systems should cover the costs of gender transition no differently than the costs of other medical procedures

Agree 44%40% Disagree

Wording notes: parity framing ('no differently than')

neutral — parity framing is the natural statement of the policy

Subgroup figures (10)

region

GroupAgreeDisagree
United States39%47%
Great Britain34%47%
Canada36%48%
Australia44%42%
Ireland46%39%
Sportssupport/opposein a trend series
transgender athletes competing by gender identity

To what extent do you support or oppose the following:

Transgender athletes competing based on the gender they identify with rather the sex they were assigned at birth

Support 27%40% Oppose

Wording notes: uses 'the sex they were assigned at birth'

neutral — both poles of the comparison are named and the scale is symmetric

Subgroup figures (10)

region

GroupSupportOppose
United States21%52%
Great Britain19%54%
Canada21%48%
Australia23%47%
Ireland25%46%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →