probability panel
Marquette Law School Poll
Marquette Law School Poll national Supreme Court survey · Nov 15–22, 2022 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- Marquette Law School Poll academic
- Sponsor
- Marquette University Law School
- Fielded
- Nov 15–22, 2022
- Population
- adults
- Sample size
- 1,004
- Sample frame
- probability panel
- Panel
- SSRS Opinion Panel
- Mode
- online - SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online (Marquette's own description)
- Margin of error
- ±3.7 percentage points
- Geography
- US national
Sources
Verification note. Toplines read from Marquette's MLSPSC11 topline HTML; Bostock confirmed against MLSPSC28 trend topline. Sample size and MOE from Marquette's MLSPSC11 court press release. Party crosstabs not retrieved for this wave.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (2)
Bostock v. Clayton County - workplace protections for gay and transgender workers
In 2020 the Supreme Court ruled that a federal civil rights law protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
Wording notes: bundles sexual orientation and gender identity into one item | describes an existing Court holding rather than an abstract policy
neutral — Neutral description of the holding; 'favor or oppose this decision' is symmetric. Because gay and transgender workers are bundled, the item cannot isolate attitudes toward gender identity alone.
congressional agenda item: ban transgender athletes from sports competition
[Ban transgender athletes from sports competition] Here are things some people wish Congress would do next year. Regardless of whether you think Congress will actually do these things, which would favor and which would you oppose?
Wording notes: blanket ban with no age, level or sex qualifier | no middle option | embedded in a list of congressional agenda items
neutral — States only the restrictive alternative ('Ban ...') and asks favor/oppose, so the affirming position is unnamed; the ban is also unqualified as to school level or category of competition.