probability panel

Marquette Law School Poll

Marquette Law School Poll national Supreme Court survey · Mar 13–22, 2023 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Marquette Law School Poll academic
Sponsor
Marquette University Law School
Fielded
Mar 13–22, 2023
Population
adults
Sample size
1,004
Sample frame
probability panel
Panel
SSRS Opinion Panel
Mode
online - SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online (Marquette's own description)
Margin of error
not disclosed
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Toplines read from Marquette's MLSPSC13 topline HTML; Bostock confirmed against the MLSPSC28 trend topline. Margin of error not retrieved for this wave. Party crosstabs not retrieved for this wave.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (2)

Nondiscriminationfavor/opposein a trend series
Bostock v. Clayton County - workplace protections for gay and transgender workers

In 2020 the Supreme Court ruled that a federal civil rights law protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?

Favor 80%19% Oppose

Wording notes: bundles sexual orientation and gender identity into one item | describes an existing Court holding rather than an abstract policy

neutral — Neutral description of the holding; 'favor or oppose this decision' is symmetric. Because gay and transgender workers are bundled, the item cannot isolate attitudes toward gender identity alone.

Sportsfavor/opposein a trend series
policy proposal: require transgender athletes to compete on teams matching sex assigned at birth

[Require that transgender athletes compete on teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with] Which of the following proposals would you favor and which would you oppose?

Favor 70%30% Oppose

Wording notes: uses 'the sex they were assigned at birth' | restrictive alternative is the only one stated | no middle option

neutral — Only the restrictive proposal is described; respondents favor or oppose it rather than choosing between two stated alternatives. The 'sex they were assigned at birth' / 'gender they identify with' contrast is symmetric in vocabulary.

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →