probability panel
Marquette Law School Poll
Marquette Law School Poll national Supreme Court survey · Feb 5–15, 2024 · US national
Data flag. RESOLVED - RECORD IS CORRECT. Opened in a real browser session: the cited toplines file does contain item C12 'Favor/oppose LGBT workplace protections' with the exact recorded wording and figures (Strongly favor 52 / Somewhat favor 30 / Somewhat oppose 13 / Strongly oppose 5), fielded February 5-15 2024. The earlier UNVERIFIABLE verdict came from automated fetches truncating before the item, which sits ~13,000 characters into the page. No change needed.
Methodology
- Pollster
- Marquette Law School Poll academic
- Sponsor
- Marquette University Law School
- Fielded
- Feb 5–15, 2024
- Population
- adults
- Sample size
- 1,003
- Sample frame
- probability panel
- Panel
- SSRS Opinion Panel
- Mode
- online - SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online (Marquette's own description)
- Margin of error
- not disclosed
- Geography
- US national
Sources
Verification note. Topline read from Marquette's MLSPSC18 court-items topline HTML; confirmed against the MLSPSC28 trend topline. Margin of error not retrieved for this wave. Party crosstabs not retrieved for this wave.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (1)
Bostock v. Clayton County - workplace protections for gay and transgender workers
In 2020 the Supreme Court ruled that a federal civil rights law protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
Wording notes: bundles sexual orientation and gender identity into one item | describes an existing Court holding rather than an abstract policy
neutral — Neutral description of the holding; 'favor or oppose this decision' is symmetric. Because gay and transgender workers are bundled, the item cannot isolate attitudes toward gender identity alone.