McLaughlin & Associates Hispanic Voter Survey (with John Jordan and Dick Morris) · Nov 12–17, 2021 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- McLaughlin & Associates partisan_r
- Sponsor
- McLaughlin & Associates
- Fielded
- Nov 12–17, 2021
- Population
- likely Hispanic voters
- Sample size
- 1,000
- Sample frame
- online opt-in
- Mode
- online; respondents could take the survey in Spanish or English (23% Spanish, 77% English); online survey invitations distributed to likely Hispanic voters
- Margin of error
- not disclosed
- Weighting
- not disclosed in the public release deck
- Geography
- US national
- Base notes
- Sample covers likely Hispanic voters in every state except California
Sources
Verification note. Wording and percentages transcribed from the McLaughlin & Associates Hispanic Voter Survey release deck (slide 45). The four-point components sum to the printed nets (19+23=42 approve, 20+38=58 disapprove), confirming the reading. Methodology slide gives n, field dates, language split and online mode but no margin of error and no weighting statement. Party crosstabs are not published in the release deck.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
trans girls competing against cisgender girls in school sports, framed as a Democratic proposal
The following are proposals made by Democrats that are opposed by Republicans.
Allowing transgender boys (who have become girls) to compete against biological girls in school sports.
Wording notes: the preamble explicitly attaches a partisan owner to the policy before it is described, converting the item into a partisan cue test | 'transgender boys (who have become girls)' is internally incoherent - it applies the male term to trans girls and then glosses transition as having 'become' something | 'biological girls' as the contrast term | no 'don't know' option offered in the published distribution
loaded_terms — two compounding problems: the partisan preamble means the item measures party cue as much as policy view, and the parenthetical '(who have become girls)' garbles the subject so badly that it is unclear which group a respondent believed they were answering about
Subgroup figures (6)