unknown
McLaughlin & Associates
McLaughlin & Associates National Survey, January 2025 · Jan 22–27, 2025 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- McLaughlin & Associates partisan_r
- Sponsor
- McLaughlin & Associates
- Fielded
- Jan 22–27, 2025
- Population
- general election voters
- Sample size
- 1,000
- Sample frame
- unknown
- Mode
- not disclosed in the release deck
- Margin of error
- not disclosed
- Weighting
- not disclosed in the public release deck
- Geography
- US national
Sources
Verification note. Question wording, topline and the full published crosstab column transcribed from the McLaughlin & Associates public release deck (slide rendered to image and read, because the figures are chart graphics and the crosstab column mis-orders under PDF text extraction). Bar-chart components sum to the printed nets, confirming the reading. McLaughlin's public release decks state the population and field dates but carry no methodology page: mode, sample frame, weighting and margin of error are all undisclosed.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (1)
federal law barring trans women and girls from women's and girls' sports
Do you support or oppose Congress passing a federal law that prevents biological males from competing in women's and girls' sports?
Wording notes: 'biological males' is the only descriptor offered | 'prevents ... from competing' frames a ban as prevention, which is easier to endorse than 'ban' | no age, sport or level of competition specified | fielded in the week of the second Trump inauguration, when the executive order on this subject was imminent
loaded_terms — the restrictive side is described as 'preventing' rather than 'banning' or 'excluding', and trans women and girls appear only as 'biological males'; both choices push the item's 67% support well above what neutrally worded versions of the same policy return
Subgroup figures (40)
party
ideology
gender
age
race
region
2024_vote
other