online opt-in

Morning Consult

Morning Consult/POLITICO National Tracking Poll #210332 · Mar 6–8, 2021 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Morning Consult commercial
Sponsor
Morning Consult
Commissioned by
POLITICO
Fielded
Mar 6–8, 2021
Population
registered voters
Sample size
1,990
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
Morning Consult online panel
Mode
online - self-administered web survey of the Morning Consult online panel
Margin of error
plus or minus 2 percentage points
Weighting
weighted to approximate a target sample of registered voters based on gender, educational attainment, age, race, and region
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Question wording, topline and PID crosstabs read directly from Table POL20 of the Morning Consult crosstabulation PDF (pp. 248-251). Morning Consult's own article pages from this era return 404 on the migrated corporate site and web.archive.org was unreachable from this network, so the crosstab PDF on assets.morningconsult.com is the primary source. Only the trans-related table is captured; the rest of the tracking poll is off-topic.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Sports4-point scalein a trend series
banning transgender athletes from women's school and college sports in Mississippi

As you may know, Mississippi is moving towards banning transgender athletes from participating on women's sports teams at the state's high schools and universities.

As you may know, Mississippi is moving towards banning transgender athletes from participating on women's sports teams at the state's high schools and universities. Based on what you know, do you support or oppose banning transgender athletes from competing on women's sports teams?

Support 53%32% Oppose

Wording notes: asks about support for the ban rather than for participation, so support means restriction | the preamble presents the ban as already in motion, an implicit bandwagon cue | 'Based on what you know' invites an answer from low information rather than offering an explicit no-opinion out first | national sample asked about one specific state's legislation

tilts_restrictive — the stem is directional: the preamble narrates the ban as an underway state action before asking about it, and the scale is anchored on supporting the ban, so acquiescence works toward restriction; wording is otherwise plain and both directions are offered

Subgroup figures (15)

party

GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know / No opinion
Democrat (no lean)21%19%15%27%18%
Independent (no lean)32%17%15%18%18%
Republican (no lean)61%13%7%8%11%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →