online opt-in

Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)

Napolitan News Service Survey · Jan 21–22, 2025 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research) independent
Sponsor
Napolitan News Service
Commissioned by
Napolitan News Service Gold Circle Members
Fielded
Jan 21–22, 2025
Population
registered voters
Sample size
1,000
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
RMG Research online panel
Mode
online; certain quotas applied and the sample lightly weighted by geography, gender, age, race, education, internet usage and political party to reflect the national population of Registered Voters
Margin of error
±3.1 percentage points
Weighting
lightly weighted by geography, gender, age, race, education, internet usage, and political party
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Question wording and percentages transcribed directly from the free Napolitan News Service topline PDF. Full crosstabs are behind the Gold Circle Member paywall and were NOT retrieved, so no party breaks are recorded here except where the free news brief states them in prose. Favor/oppose totals (62/31) are sums of the published four-point shares, not separately printed. || Verbatim wording and full response distributions read from the Napolitan News Service composite topline PDF, downloaded in this session. That PDF carries two surveys back to back, each labelled with its own field dates, so the two fieldings are recorded here as separate poll records. Napolitan News Service is the publishing arm of the Napolitan Institute (Scott Rasmussen); the fieldwork line on every page reads 'Conducted by RMG Research, Inc.' Party crosstabs exist but are behind the 'Gold Circle' paywall, so only totals are carried. The PDF publishes no weighting statement, mode, or response rate. This wave was in the field on January 21-22, 2025, the day after Executive Order 14168 was signed.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Legal documents & IDsfavor/opposein a trend series
Trump executive order requiring federal agencies to recognize only two sexes

President Trump signed an executive order requiring government agencies to recognize that there are only two sexes, male and female. Do you favor or oppose this policy?

Favor 62%31% Oppose
Favor (total) 62%

Wording notes: attributes the policy to Trump by name, which turns the item partly into a partisan cue | describes the order only by its own self-description and never states its practical effect on passports, IDs or federal records

neutral — symmetric favor/oppose four-point scale and an accurate one-sentence description of the order; the named sponsor is a cue but naming the actor is standard for policy-approval items

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →