unknown
NORC (AmeriSpeak)
NORC at the University of Chicago survey for the Los Angeles Times on attitudes toward gay, lesbian and transgender people · Jan 18–26, 2024 · US national
Data flag. field dates were missing. NORC's own page for the LA Times/NORC LGBTQ+ survey gives January 18-26 2024, n=1,624 with a 313-respondent LGBTQ+ subsample. Note the poll_id says 2024-06 (the release month); the fielding was January. | see above | n stated on NORC's own page
Methodology
- Pollster
- NORC (AmeriSpeak) media
- Sponsor
- Los Angeles Times
- Commissioned by
- Los Angeles Times
- Fielded
- Jan 18–26, 2024
- Population
- adults
- Sample size
- 1,624
- Sample frame
- unknown
- Mode
- not disclosed in the write-up retrieved
- Margin of error
- not disclosed
- Geography
- US national
- Base notes
- Reported as 'more than 1,600 Americans'; exact n not published in the write-up retrieved.
Sources
Verification note. Party figures only (Republicans 29% in favor, Democrats 70%) read from Newsweek's report on the NORC/Los Angeles Times survey, retrieved in session. MISSING: the Total row, exact field dates, sample size, mode and the fielded stem. Included because the framing - support for state laws that PROTECT access - is the mirror image of every ban item in this file and is rare in the corpus.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (1)
minors; PROTECTIVE-LAW framing - support for state laws that protect access to gender-affirming care, rather than laws that ban it
[Are you in favor of] state laws that protect access to gender-affirming care for minors
Wording reconstructed from: Newsweek's description of the NORC/Los Angeles Times survey, June 7, 2024; no topline located.
Wording notes: PROTECTIVE framing (favor = permit) - the reverse polarity of nearly every other item in this file | umbrella term, no treatment named | state-law scope | no age threshold beyond 'minors'
neutral — The Republican figure is the interesting one: 29% of Republicans affirmatively favour laws protecting minors' access, against roughly 10-20% of Republicans who oppose bans in ban-framed items from the same period. Some of that gap is polarity - it is easier to endorse a protection than to oppose a prohibition - which is exactly the asymmetry this file exists to document.
Subgroup figures (2)