probability ABS mail

Pew Research Center

2023-24 Religious Landscape Study (RLS-III) · Jul 17, 2023 – Mar 4, 2024 · US national

Data flag. re-sourced: Pew's own final Religious Landscape Study topline, fielded July 17 2023 - March 4 2024, N=36,908; the CHNG acceptance item and the GENDER item both match verbatim

Methodology

Pollster
Pew Research Center independent
Sponsor
Pew Research Center
Commissioned by
Pew Research Center (Pew Charitable Trusts / Lilly Endowment funding)
Fielded
Jul 17, 2023 – Mar 4, 2024
Population
adults
Sample size
36,908
Sample frame
probability ABS mail
Mode
self-administered online and paper questionnaire, address-based recruitment, with a small telephone component; a separate telephone 'bridge study' was fielded alongside for mode-comparability testing only
Margin of error
not disclosed in the topline header (varies by subgroup; the full-sample error is well under 1 point at n=36,908)
Weighting
weighted to national benchmarks for demographics and, at the state level, to account for the stratified address-based design
Geography
US national
Base notes
CHNG battery asked of all respondents; the transgender item (CHNGc) was new in 2023-24 and has no 2007 or 2014 trend.

Sources

Verification note. Total percentages read directly from the RLS-III final topline PDF (item CHNGc). Religion-group breakdowns come from Pew's Feb. 26, 2025 report chapter 'Religion and views on LGBTQ issues and abortion'; some group figures in that chapter could not be captured in full. This is the only transgender-specific item in the RLS-III topline. || Question wording and full-sample distribution read verbatim from the RLS-III final topline PDF (CHNG item c). Religious-group breaks taken from the Pew report chapter 'Religion and views on LGBTQ issues and abortion'; that chapter reports only better/worse shares for most groups, so 'hasn't made much difference' is recorded only for the total.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (2)

General acceptanceforced choicein a trend series
whether greater social acceptance of transgender people has been a change for the better

Thinking about changes in our society over the last 50 years, all in all, do you think each of the following has been a change for the better, a change for the worse, or hasn't made much difference? ... Greater social acceptance of people who are transgender (that is, people who identify as a gender that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth)

Change for the better
39%
Change for the worse
38%
Hasn't made much difference
21%
No answer
2%

Wording notes: items CHNGa-c randomized and displayed on one page | 'over the last 50 years' framing | asked for the first time in the 2023-24 RLS, so no 2007/2014 comparison

neutral — balanced better/worse pair with an explicit no-difference option; definition of transgender supplied inline

Subgroup figures (21)

religion

GroupChange for the betterChange for the worseA change for the worseA change for the better
Religiously affiliated adults32%45%——
Religiously unaffiliated adults58%22%——
Evangelical Protestants—64%——
Latter-day Saints—55%——
Orthodox Christians—50%——
Hindus67%———
Jews59%———
Religiously affiliated (identify with a religion)——45%32%
Religiously unaffiliated——22%58%
Evangelical Protestant——64%—
Latter-day Saint——55%—
Orthodox Christian——50%—
Muslim——48%—
Mainline Protestant——37%39%
Jewish———59%
Hindu———67%
Contact & populationforced choicein a trend series
respondent self-description of gender, including a non-binary 'some other way' option

Do you describe yourself as a man, a woman or in some other way?

A woman
51%
A man
46%
In some other way
2%
No answer
1%

Wording notes: measurement approach changed from prior waves: 2007 used interviewer observation and 2014 asked 'Are you male or female?', so the 'in some other way' share has no comparable trend | does not separately identify transgender men or transgender women, only a residual 'some other way' category

neutral — standard three-option self-description; the residual category undercounts binary-identified transgender respondents, which is a measurement limitation rather than a slant

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →