probability panel
PRRI
PRRI 2023 American Values Atlas (pooled Waves 1-4, LGBTQ module) · Mar 9, 2023 – Dec 7, 2023 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- PRRI independent
- Sponsor
- PRRI
- Fielded
- Mar 9, 2023 – Dec 7, 2023
- Population
- adults
- Sample size
- 22,465
- Sample frame
- probability panel
- Panel
- Ipsos KnowledgePanel
- Mode
- online, self-administered - Ipsos KnowledgePanel (probability, address-based sampling from the USPS Delivery Sequence File), supplemented with Ipsos opt-in panel respondents calibrated to the KnowledgePanel weights to reach minimum sample sizes in smaller states
- Margin of error
- +/- 0.82 percentage points
- Weighting
- pre-stratification to the 2022 March CPS Supplement (language proficiency from the 2021 ACS), PPS selection, post-stratification raking (IPF) on age, race and ethnicity, gender, Census division, metro area, education and income; separate weights for each state; opt-in cases calibrated to the KnowledgePanel weights
- Geography
- US national
- Base notes
- Pooled annual AVA dataset: 20,799 Ipsos KnowledgePanel respondents plus 1,666 recruited by Ipsos from opt-in panels to raise small-state sample sizes. This is an aggregation of the 2023 monthly waves rather than a single fielding; PRRI's 50-state estimates are published off the pooled file. The Q10d gender-affirming-care row pools only the March and August 2023 waves.
Sources
Verification note. Distributions from the 2023 and 2024 AVA topline PDFs; n, field dates, MOE, design effect and weighting from the 2023 topline's Survey Methodology section; party nets from the PRRI 2023 AVA report.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (3)
LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q6. Do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE STATEMENTS]
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Favor 37%Favor (net) 76%
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one item | three policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
neutral — symmetric favor/oppose scale, no loaded terms; the design limitation is that it is double-barreled across three policy domains and four identity groups, so transgender-specific support cannot be isolated
Subgroup figures (3)
laws preventing parents from allowing a minor to receive gender-transition medical care
Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:
Laws that prevent parents from allowing their child to receive medical care for a gender transition.
Favor 19%
Wording notes: frames the ban as constraining parents rather than minors or providers | does not name specific interventions (puberty blockers, hormones, surgery) | 'medical care for a gender transition' rather than 'gender-affirming care'
tilts_affirming — the parental-authority frame ('prevent parents from allowing') suppresses support for restriction relative to wordings that foreground the minor or the specific medical procedure; PRRI's readings run notably less restrictive than pollsters who ask about 'gender transition medical treatment for minors' directly
how much LGBTQ rights would drive a vote for major political office (LGBTQ-general item, not transgender-specific)
Q12. Thinking about how the following issues might affect your vote for major political offices, would you:
LGBTQ rights
Consider a candidate's position on this issue as just one of many important factors
38%
Only vote for a candidate who shares your views on this issue
30%
Not see this as a major issue
29%
Skipped/Refused
2%
Wording notes: names 'LGBTQ rights' as a bloc rather than any transgender-specific policy | does not distinguish salience for supporters from salience for opponents
unclear — the item measures intensity without direction, so a high 'only vote for a candidate who shares your views' share can be driven by either pro- or anti-LGBTQ respondents; PRRI does not publish a directional split on the face of the topline