mixed-mode probability

PRRI

PRRI American Values Atlas - LGBTQ module · Mar 13, 2024 – Dec 2, 2024 · US national (50-state)

Methodology

Pollster: PRRI independent
Sponsor: PRRI (Public Religion Research Institute)
Fielded: Mar 13, 2024 – Dec 2, 2024
Population: adults
Sample size: 22,260
Sample frame: mixed-mode probability
Mode: online - 22,260 adults, 20,642 from Ipsos KnowledgePanel plus 1,618 recruited by Ipsos from opt-in panels to reach a minimum of n=150 in smaller states
Margin of error: not disclosed
Weighting: weighted by PRRI to national population parameters; see the topline's methodology section
Geography: US national (50-state)

Sources

Verification note. WORDING RECOVERY SWEEP. Battery instruction and item text copied character-for-character from PRRI's 2024 AVA LGBTQ Module Wave 1-4 topline (Q10/Q10a). The database previously reconstructed the favor/oppose stem.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (2)

Nondiscriminationfavor/opposein a trend series

LGBT nondiscrimination protections

How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.

Strongly favor

37%

Strongly oppose

Skipped/Refused

Favor 38%Oppose 14%

Wording notes: names all four groups explicitly | lists three specific domains (jobs, public accommodations, housing) | battery item with no standalone stem

neutral — plain statement of the policy; no argument attached in either direction

Legal documents & IDsfavor/opposein a trend series

sex marker on driver's licenses and government ID

How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that require driver's licenses or government ID to display the person's sex at birth rather than their gender identity.

30%

15%

Favor 30%22% Oppose

Favor 29%

Wording notes: restrictive policy is the 'favor' pole

neutral — plain statement of the policy with a symmetric scale

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →