probability panel

PRRI

PRRI American Values Atlas June 2024 wave (LGBTQ module) · Jun 2024 – Jun 30, 2024 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
PRRI independent
Sponsor
PRRI
Fielded
Jun 2024 – Jun 30, 2024
Population
adults
Sample size
—
Sample frame
probability panel
Panel
Ipsos KnowledgePanel
Mode
online, self-administered - Ipsos KnowledgePanel (probability, address-based sampling from the USPS Delivery Sequence File), supplemented with Ipsos opt-in panel respondents calibrated to the KnowledgePanel weights to reach minimum sample sizes in smaller states
Margin of error
not disclosed
Geography
US national
Base notes
Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.

Sources

Verification note. All three distributions read directly from the 2024 AVA LGBTQ topline trend tables.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (3)

Nondiscriminationfavor/opposein a trend series
LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)

Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.

Favor 38%14% Oppose
Favor 36%

Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one item | three policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)

neutral — symmetric favor/oppose scale, no loaded terms; the design limitation is that it is double-barreled across three policy domains and four identity groups, so transgender-specific support cannot be isolated

Youth medical carefavor/opposein a trend series
laws preventing parents from allowing a minor to receive gender-transition medical care

Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that prevent parents from allowing their child to receive medical care for a gender transition.

Favor 25%25% Oppose
Favor 21%

Wording notes: frames the ban as constraining parents rather than minors or providers | does not name specific interventions (puberty blockers, hormones, surgery) | 'medical care for a gender transition' rather than 'gender-affirming care'

tilts_affirming — the parental-authority frame ('prevent parents from allowing') suppresses support for restriction relative to wordings that foreground the minor or the specific medical procedure; PRRI's readings run notably less restrictive than pollsters who ask about 'gender transition medical treatment for minors' directly

Legal documents & IDsfavor/opposein a trend series
driver's licenses and government IDs required to display sex at birth rather than gender identity

Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that require driver's licenses or government ID to display the person's sex at birth rather than their gender identity.

Favor 30%23% Oppose
Favor 28%

Wording notes: uses 'sex at birth' against 'gender identity'

neutral — both poles named; no evaluative language attached to either option

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →