probability RDD

Quinnipiac University

Quinnipiac University National Poll · Jun 21–27, 2016 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Quinnipiac University academic
Sponsor
Quinnipiac University
Fielded
Jun 21–27, 2016
Population
registered voters
Sample size
1,610
Sample frame
probability RDD
Mode
telephone - random digit dialing, live interviewers calling landlines and cell phones
Margin of error
+/- 2.4 percentage points
Weighting
not disclosed
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Toplines and crosstabs read from the Quinnipiac topline PDF (p.14). LGBT-combined item, but it explicitly names transgender so it is in scope; it cannot be disaggregated to a transgender-only reading.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Feeling thermometers4-point scalein a trend series
comfort with a gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender vice president

If you honestly assessed yourself, how comfortable do you think you would be with - a gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender vice president: would you be very comfortable, somewhat comfortable, not so comfortable, or not at all comfortable?

Very comfortable
50%
Smwht comfortable
23%
Not at all
13%
Not so comfortable
11%
DK/NA
4%

Wording notes: collapses gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender into a single stimulus; no transgender-only reading is recoverable | part of a battery of hypothetical VP traits (the preceding item asked about a female vice president)

unclear — the item is symmetric and standard, but bundling four distinct identities into one stimulus makes the transgender component unmeasurable

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupVery comfortableNot at all
Republicans30%22%
Democrats64%6%
Independents52%12%

gender

GroupVery comfortable
Men46%
Women53%

age

GroupVery comfortable
18-3462%
35-4959%
50-6445%
65+33%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →