probability RDD
QUQuinnipiac University
Quinnipiac University Texas Poll · May 29, 2019 – Jun 4, 2019 · US: Texas
Methodology
- Pollster
- Quinnipiac University academic
- Sponsor
- Quinnipiac University
- Fielded
- May 29, 2019 – Jun 4, 2019
- Population
- registered voters
- Sample size
- 1,159
- Sample frame
- probability RDD
- Mode
- telephone - random digit dialing, live interviewers calling landlines and cell phones
- Margin of error
- +/- 3.4 percentage points, including the design effect
- Weighting
- not disclosed
- Geography
- US: Texas
Sources
Verification note. Topline wording and crosstabs read from the Quinnipiac Texas release PDF (p.4). DISCREPANCY NOTED: the topline prints 'sexual orientation or sexual identity' while Quinnipiac's own narrative (pp.1-2) describes the item as covering 'sexual orientation or gender identity'. Recorded here with the topline wording verbatim; scope inclusion rests on the pollster's own gender-identity characterisation. LGBTQ-combined item; cannot be disaggregated.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (1)
whether businesses may refuse service based on sexual orientation or sexual/gender identity
Do you think businesses should or should not be allowed to refuse service to someone based on their sexual orientation or sexual identity?
Should not
71%
Should/Be allowed
22%
DK/NA
7%
Wording notes: topline says 'sexual identity' where the press release says 'gender identity' - the two documents do not agree | LGBTQ-combined stimulus; no transgender-only reading is recoverable
unclear — the alternatives are symmetric, but 'sexual identity' is not a standard term and it is unclear which construct respondents heard; the pollster's own two documents describe the item differently
Subgroup figures (10)