IVR

Rasmussen Reports

Rasmussen Reports - Transgender Athletes · Oct 31, 2019 – Nov 2, 2019 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
Rasmussen Reports commercial
Sponsor
Rasmussen Reports
Fielded
Oct 31, 2019 – Nov 2, 2019
Population
adults
Sample size
1,000
Sample frame
IVR
Mode
national telephone and online survey; automated telephone interviews (IVR) combined with an online sample; field work by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC
Margin of error
+/- 3 percentage points
Weighting
not disclosed in the public release; Rasmussen weights to demographic targets for age, race, gender, political party and other variables
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Question wording copied verbatim from the Rasmussen Reports public 'Questions' page. Percentages come from the free portion of the Rasmussen article; the full topline and crosstabs sit behind Rasmussen's Platinum paywall (/platinum/...), so items marked with empty results could not be retrieved. Wayback Machine was unavailable (Internet Archive offline) at time of access. Q1 percentages are from the article 'Americans Oppose Transgender Trend in Athletics' (Nov 8, 2019). Q2 percentages are paywalled.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Sportsfavor/opposein a trend series
trans students on teams matching gender identity

Do you favor or oppose allowing transgender students to participate on the sports teams of the gender they identify with, letting biological males, for example, play girls' sports?

Favor 29%51% Oppose

Wording notes: the stem appends an interpretive clause - 'letting biological males, for example, play girls' sports' - which recharacterizes the policy before the respondent answers | 'biological males' used to denote trans girls

tilts_restrictive — the trailing clause is the whole design: it converts a neutral eligibility question into a statement about 'biological males' in 'girls' sports'. When Rasmussen dropped this clause in February 2021 the favor share went UP (29% to 32%) despite the intervening news environment, which is the direction one would expect if the clause suppresses support

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →