unknown
Rasmussen Reports
Rasmussen Reports / American Thinker - Nevada · Sep 19–22, 2024 · US: Nevada
Data flag. MOE IS THE SOURCE'S OWN. Rasmussen states +/-3 for n=738 (floor 3.61) and publishes no explanation of how it computes margins. Recorded faithfully.
Methodology
- Pollster
- Rasmussen Reports commercial
- Sponsor
- American Thinker
- Commissioned by
- American Thinker
- Fielded
- Sep 19–22, 2024
- Population
- likely voters
- Sample size
- 738
- Sample frame
- unknown
- Mode
- telephone and online; fieldwork conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC
- Margin of error
- +/- 3 percentage points
- Weighting
- not disclosed
- Geography
- US: Nevada
Sources
Verification note. Totals read from the public Rasmussen/American Thinker Nevada topline page; party breaks from the matching public crosstab page. Rasmussen's topline template prints the Q28 scale with agree/disagree labels although the stem is support/oppose; labels here follow the topline page for consistency with the sibling Wisconsin record already in the database.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (2)
whether there are only two genders
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: There are only two genders?
Wording notes: single-statement agreement format with no counter-statement | asserts the restrictive proposition as the statement to be agreed with
loaded_terms — the item asks agreement with a contested assertion rather than offering a symmetric pair of alternatives, so acquiescence bias pushes toward the restrictive answer
Subgroup figures (15)
hormone therapy and surgery for minors
Do you support or oppose gender transition therapy for minors, to include hormone replacement therapy and gender reassignment surgery?
Wording notes: bundles hormone therapy with surgery | uses 'gender reassignment surgery' | topline scale is printed with agree/disagree labels although the stem is support/oppose
tilts_restrictive — explicitly naming surgery alongside hormones for minors raises the least-supported intervention and drags the combined item toward opposition; no age band or clinical gatekeeping is described
Subgroup figures (15)