online opt-in

Research Co.

Research Co. poll on SOGI-Inclusive Education in Canada · Jun 8–10, 2024 · Canada national

Methodology

Pollster
Research Co. commercial
Sponsor
Research Co.
Fielded
Jun 8–10, 2024
Population
adults
Sample size
1,001
Sample frame
online opt-in
Mode
online study
Margin of error
±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Weighting
statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region
Geography
Canada national
Base notes
Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Sources

Verification note. Question wording copied verbatim from the Research Co. data tables PDF; the national ('Canada') column values are read from those tables and every net reported here reconciles with Research Co.'s own release text. Party breaks are recorded only for the sports item, where the 21-column row was fully recoverable and reconciles.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (9)

School policysupport/opposein a trend series
SOGI-inclusive education in schools

As you may know, some school districts in Canada have relied on "SOGI-Inclusive Education", which raises awareness of and welcomes students of all sexual orientations, gender identities and family structures. From what you have seen, read, heard or experienced about "SOGI-Inclusive Education", do you support or oppose its use in your province?

Support (net)
48%
Oppose (net)
31%
Not sure
21%

Wording notes: the stem supplies a sympathetic definition of SOGI-inclusive education before asking

tilts_affirming — the definition offered in the stem ('raises awareness of and welcomes students of all sexual orientations, gender identities and family structures') states the policy in its proponents' terms, with no counter-description

Subgroup figures (3)

parent_status

GroupSupport (net)Oppose (net)Not sure
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1852%33%15%
Youth medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
banning gender-affirming surgery for minors aged 17 and under

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Banning top and bottom surgeries for minors aged 17 and under.

Agree 66%22% Disagree

Wording notes: policies are presented as a real government's proposals | the item asks about a ban rather than about access

neutral — the policy is described in the government's own operative terms and the agree/disagree scale is symmetric

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1870%
Youth medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
banning hormone therapy and puberty blockers for minors aged 15 and under

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Banning hormone therapies for gender affirmation and puberty blockers for minors aged 15 and under.

Agree 61%26% Disagree

Wording notes: the item asks about a ban rather than about access

neutral — policy described in operative terms with a symmetric scale

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1867%
Youth medical careagree/disagreein a trend series
hormone therapy for 16- and 17-year-olds with parental, physician and psychologist approval

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Allowing minors aged 16 and 17 to start hormone therapies for gender affirmation if they have the approval of their parents, a physician and a psychologist.

Agree 45%44% Disagree

Wording notes: stacks three separate approvals (parents, physician, psychologist) into the condition

neutral — the triple-approval condition makes this the most permissive framing available, so the 45% agreement is a ceiling estimate for youth access in this poll

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1844%
Parental rightsagree/disagreein a trend series
parental notification and consent for a name/pronoun change at school (under 16)

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Compelling schools to advise parents and obtain their consent if a minor aged 15 and under wishes to alter their name or pronouns.

Agree 60%30% Disagree

neutral — policy described in operative terms with a symmetric scale

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1861%
School policyagree/disagreein a trend series
parental opt-in for classroom discussion of gender identity and sexuality

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Ensuring that parents "opt-in" any minors every time topics such as gender identity, sexual orientation or sexuality are discussed in the classroom.

Agree 55%30% Disagree

neutral — policy described in operative terms with a symmetric scale

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1861%
Sportsagree/disagreein a trend series
banning trans women from women's sports leagues

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Banning transgender women from taking part in women's sports leagues competitions.

Agree 54%32% Disagree

Wording notes: the item asks about a ban rather than about participation

neutral — policy described in operative terms with a symmetric scale; note that asking about a ban rather than about inclusion is not symmetric with how most sports items in this database are worded

Subgroup figures (8)

party

GroupStrongly agree
Liberal 2021 voters28%
Conservative 2021 voters54%
NDP 2021 voters29%

gender

GroupStrongly agree
Male42%
Female30%

region

GroupStrongly agree
Alberta43%
Quebec29%

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1858%
School policyagree/disagreein a trend series
provincial approval of third-party teaching materials on gender identity

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? The provincial education ministry approving all third-party teaching materials on gender identity, sexual orientation or sexuality that are used in the classroom.

Agree 48%37% Disagree

neutral — policy described in operative terms with a symmetric scale

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupAgree (net)
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1850%
School policyparaphrasedotherin a trend series
predicted consequences of the Alberta policies

How likely or unlikely do you think each of the following outcomes is if these policies are implemented?

Wording reconstructed from: paraphrased from Research Co.'s release text; the verbatim stem for this grid was not recovered from the tables PDF

Likely - parents will be in full control of the way their children learn about sexuality
48%
Likely - gender-diverse youth will be placed at risk
48%
Likely - medical practitioners unable to assess the ethical and medical implications of individual cases
43%
Likely - gender-diverse youth unable to seek support from teachers or school staff
43%
Likely - an increase in sexually transmitted diseases
40%
Likely - an increase in teenage pregnancies
35%

Wording notes: outcome list mixes protective and harmful consequences

unclear — verbatim stem not recovered

Subgroup figures (1)

parent_status

GroupLikely - gender-diverse youth will be placed at risk
Parents/guardians of children aged 0-1851%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →