online opt-in

Texas Politics Project (UT-Austin)

University of Texas/Texas Politics Project Poll, June 2023 · Jun 2023 · US: Texas

Methodology

Pollster
Texas Politics Project (UT-Austin) academic
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin / Texas Politics Project
Fielded
Jun 2023
Population
registered voters
Sample size
—
Sample frame
online opt-in
Mode
online - YouGov matched sample of Texas registered voters (standard Texas Politics Project methodology)
Margin of error
+/- 2.83% (stated on the published graphic)
Geography
US: Texas

Sources

Verification note. Wording and all percentages read out of the embedded Highcharts data block, retrieved in session. MISSING: exact field dates and sample size. Note the June stem differs from April's: it frames the items as bills 'the Texas Legislature considered this year', i.e. retrospective rather than prospective.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Youth medical caresupport/opposein a trend series
minors (no age threshold named); umbrella term 'gender-affirming care'; BAN framing directed at doctors; retrospective legislative framing

Below are some proposals that the Texas Legislature considered this year. Please tell us whether you would support or oppose each of the following?

Below are some proposals that the Texas Legislature considered this year. Please tell us whether you would support or oppose each of the following? Prohibiting doctors from providing gender-affirming care to minors.

Support 60%31% Oppose

Wording notes: BAN framing (support = restrict) | umbrella term, no treatment named | targets doctors | the stem now attributes the proposal to the Texas Legislature, adding an in-group/out-group partisan cue absent in April | no age threshold

neutral — Same item as April with a legislature-attribution stem added. Movement is small at the top line (58% to 60% support) but the independent column swings hard - strong support among pure independents jumps from 35% to 60% - which is a caution about small independent bases as much as a wording effect.

Subgroup figures (15)

party

GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know/No opinion
Democrat (incl. leaners)14%17%11%47%11%
Independent (pure)60%8%11%12%10%
Republican (incl. leaners)74%12%6%2%6%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →