online opt-in

YouGov

YouGov Omnibus - LGBTQ Laws · Mar 26–28, 2016 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
YouGov commercial
Sponsor
YouGov
Fielded
Mar 26–28, 2016
Population
adults
Sample size
1,000
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
YouGov panel
Mode
web-based interviews; respondents selected from YouGov's opt-in internet panel using sample matching against a random sample stratified by gender, age, race, education, voter registration, political ideology, party identification, geographic region and voter registration drawn from the 2014 American Community Study
Margin of error
± 4% (adjusted for weighting)
Weighting
propensity-score weighting on gender, age, race, education, political ideology, geographic region and voter registration; weights range 0.029 to 6.861, mean 1, SD 0.819
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. All wording, response options, percentages and the full methodology statement extracted directly from YouGov's own topline PDF. The topline notes '20 questions not reported', so this is a partial instrument.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (4)

Bathrooms & facilitiesforced choicein a trend series
which bathrooms transgender people should use

Do you think transgender people should use the bathrooms that correspond with their birth gender or with their current gender?

Birth gender
37%
Current gender
37%
Not sure
26%

Wording notes: 'birth gender' vs 'current gender' contrast | no policy framing - asks about behavior rather than law | high not-sure share (26%)

neutral — symmetric two-alternative construction with an explicit not-sure option

Bathrooms & facilities4-point scalein a trend series
a law requiring transgender people to use the bathroom matching their birth gender

Do you favor or oppose a law that would require transgender people to use the bathroom which corresponds with the gender of their birth?

Favor 39%34% Oppose

Wording notes: favor = restriction, inverting the usual direction | paired with Q7 as a behavior-vs-law comparison on the same sample

neutral — standard symmetric four-point favor/oppose with the policy stated plainly

Subgroup figures (3)

party

GroupFavor (net)
Republican55%
Independent40%
Democrat27%
Bathrooms & facilitiesforced choicein a trend series
state preemption of local bathroom ordinances

Do you think that cities and municipalities should be able to make their own laws about who can use which bathrooms, or should there be one law for the entire state?

There should be one law for the entire state
70%
Cities and municipalities should be able to make their own laws
16%
Not sure
14%

Wording notes: does not name transgender people explicitly - euphemised as 'who can use which bathrooms' | asked directly after a parallel preemption item about anti-gay employment discrimination, so the referent is established by context

unclear — the euphemistic referent makes it ambiguous whether respondents answered about transgender access specifically or about bathroom regulation generally; included here because it is the preemption item in a transgender bathroom battery fielded during the HB2 fight

General acceptanceforced choicein a trend series
belief that transgender people are more likely to sexually assault women and children

Do you think that transgender people are more or less likely than other people to sexually assault women and children?

About as likely
43%
Less likely
25%
More likely
6%
Not sure
26%

Wording notes: directly measures the predator stereotype that anchored the 2016 bathroom-bill campaign | asks respondents to compare transgender people to 'other people' on propensity to commit sexual assault - a social-distance/stigma item rather than a policy item | offers a 'less likely' pole that has no natural constituency, which may compress the distribution

loaded_terms — the item presupposes the comparison is a live question and names 'women and children' as the victim class, importing the rhetorical frame of the bathroom-bill campaign into the stem; it is nonetheless valuable precisely as a measure of how far that frame had penetrated

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →