online opt-in

YouGov

YouGov survey on transgender athletes · Jul 5–6, 2016 · UK national

Methodology

Pollster
YouGov commercial
Sponsor
YouGov
Fielded
Jul 5–6, 2016
Population
adults
Sample size
1,732
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
YouGov panel
Mode
online panel survey
Margin of error
not disclosed
Weighting
weighted to be representative of GB adults (EU referendum vote, 2015 general election vote, gender, age, social grade, region)
Geography
UK national
Base notes
Party breaks are 2015 general election vote (Con weighted n=488, Lab 405, Lib Dem 104, UKIP 165 - the Lib Dem and UKIP bases are small).

Sources

Verification note. Wording and all figures read directly from YouGov's published data tables PDF. Earliest GB item captured in this sweep; predates the four-wave YouGov transgender series that begins in December 2018.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (1)

Sportsforced choicein a trend series
athletes who have undergone gender reassignment competing in their new gender category

Do you think athletes that have undergone gender reassignment should or should not be allowed to compete in sporting events designed for their new gender?

Yes they should, but only if it can be proven they have not gained an advantage
34%
No they should not, they should not be allowed
27%
Yes they should, everyone should be treated exactly the same
20%
Don't know
19%

Wording notes: offers an explicit conditional middle option about competitive advantage | restricts the item to athletes who have had gender reassignment

neutral — the three substantive options span outright inclusion, conditional inclusion and exclusion, which is unusually balanced for a sports item

Subgroup figures (60)

party

GroupYes they should, everyone should be treated exactly the sameYes they should, but only if it can be proven they have not gained an advantageNo they should not, they should not be allowedDon't know
Conservative 2015 GE16%37%32%14%
Labour 2015 GE25%37%19%19%
Liberal Democrat 2015 GE22%42%23%13%
UKIP 2015 GE12%28%46%15%

gender

GroupYes they should, everyone should be treated exactly the sameYes they should, but only if it can be proven they have not gained an advantageNo they should not, they should not be allowedDon't know
Male16%31%35%17%
Female23%37%19%21%

age

GroupYes they should, everyone should be treated exactly the sameYes they should, but only if it can be proven they have not gained an advantageNo they should not, they should not be allowedDon't know
18-2426%39%15%20%
25-4922%32%23%22%
50-6415%35%35%15%
65+15%36%31%17%

education

GroupYes they should, everyone should be treated exactly the sameYes they should, but only if it can be proven they have not gained an advantageNo they should not, they should not be allowedDon't know
ABC121%38%26%16%
C2DE18%30%29%23%

other

GroupYes they should, everyone should be treated exactly the sameYes they should, but only if it can be proven they have not gained an advantageNo they should not, they should not be allowedDon't know
Remain 201625%39%18%18%
Leave 201617%32%36%15%
Did not vote / don't know (EU ref)14%30%25%31%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →