online opt-in
YouGov
The Economist/YouGov Poll · Oct 6–8, 2019 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- YouGov commercial
- Sponsor
- The Economist
- Commissioned by
- The Economist
- Fielded
- Oct 6–8, 2019
- Population
- adults
- Sample size
- 1,500
- Sample frame
- online opt-in
- Panel
- YouGov Panel
- Mode
- Web-based interviews; respondents selected from YouGov's opt-in Internet panel using sample matching against a stratified random sample drawn from the American Community Survey
- Margin of error
- ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
- Weighting
- Weighted to U.S. adult population targets on gender, age, race, education and prior presidential vote; full weighting statement in the source PDF.
- Geography
- US national
- Base notes
- Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).
Sources
Verification note. Crosstab PDF downloaded and parsed; totals and party columns read directly and verified. Party crosstab for Q36 could not be disambiguated from the extracted text and is omitted.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (7)
perceived level of discrimination faced by transgender people
Level of discrimination -- Transgender people
How much discrimination do the following people face in America today?
A great deal
39%
A fair amount
30%
Not much
20%
None at all
11%
Wording notes: battery item
neutral — standard balanced four-point discrimination scale
Subgroup figures (12)
allowing transgender people to serve in the military
Do you support or oppose allowing transgender people to serve in the military?
Wording notes: drops 'openly' relative to the 2017-2018 version, so it is a different item
neutral — plain support/oppose with a Not sure
Subgroup figures (9)
federal employment nondiscrimination law
Do you support or oppose a law that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment based on sexual orientation or gender identity?
Wording notes: bundles sexual orientation and gender identity in one item, so it does not isolate transgender protections | fielded the week the Supreme Court heard Harris Funeral Homes / Bostock
neutral — plain support/oppose; the bundling is a measurement limitation rather than a slant
Subgroup figures (9)
which bathroom transgender people should use
Do you think transgender people should use the bathrooms that correspond with their birth gender or with their current gender identity?
Birth gender
39%
Current gender identity
36%
Not sure
25%
Wording notes: uses 'birth gender' here; later fieldings of the same tracker say 'assigned sex at birth'
neutral — two-sided forced choice with an explicit Not sure; the term change in later waves is a comparability caveat
Subgroup figures (9)
personal discomfort seeing a transgender man in a men's restroom
Asked of half of respondents
Would it make you feel uncomfortable if you saw someone who identifies as male, but you know was born female, enter and use the men's restroom?
Yes, I would feel uncomfortable
44%
No, it would not matter
44%
Prefer not to say
12%
Wording notes: split-half pair with the trans-woman version (Q36) | describes the person as 'someone who identifies as male, but you know was born female' rather than as a transgender man | measures personal discomfort rather than policy preference
tilts_restrictive — the 'but you know was born female' construction cues the respondent to treat birth sex as the operative fact and presupposes the respondent would know; the design is nonetheless valuable because the two halves are otherwise identical
Subgroup figures (9)
personal discomfort seeing a transgender woman in a women's restroom
Asked of half of respondents
Would it make you feel uncomfortable if you saw someone who identifies as female, but you know was born male, enter and use the women's restroom?
Yes, I would feel uncomfortable
49%
No, it would not matter
41%
Prefer not to say
10%
Wording notes: split-half pair with the trans-man version (Q34) | party crosstab not extracted
tilts_restrictive — mirror of Q34; discomfort is 5 points higher for the transgender-woman version, which is the point of the split
firing a teacher for refusing a student's pronouns
Do you approve or disapprove of firing a teacher for refusing to use a transgender student's new pronouns?
Approve 27%49% Disapprove
Wording notes: asks about the sanction (firing) rather than about the underlying pronoun policy, which is a much harder test | prompted by a specific Virginia news story asked about in the preceding item
neutral — wording is even-handed, but by asking about dismissal rather than about whether teachers should use a student's pronouns it measures views on employment sanctions, and should not be read as opposition to pronoun use as such
Subgroup figures (15)