online opt-in

YouGov

YouGov Daily Survey: Transgender Issues · Aug 25–31, 2021 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
YouGov commercial
Sponsor
YouGov
Fielded
Aug 25–31, 2021
Population
adult citizens
Sample size
1,000
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
YouGov Panel
Mode
Web-based interviews; respondents selected from YouGov's opt-in Internet panel using sample matching. A random sample (stratified by gender, age, race, education, geographic region, and voter registration) was selected from the 2016 American Community Study. Voter registration was imputed from the November 2016 Current Population Survey Registration and Voting Supplement.
Margin of error
±3.6% (adjusted for weighting)
Weighting
The sample was weighted based on gender, age, race, education, news interest, and 2016 Presidential vote (or non-vote). The weights range from 0.216 to 6.506, with a mean of one and a standard deviation of 0.586.
Geography
US national

Sources

Verification note. Toplines PDF downloaded and read directly. This release is TOPLINES ONLY - no crosstabs were published with it, so no party breaks are available for any item. This is a US fielding of the facility-access battery YouGov normally runs in Great Britain.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (7)

Identity beliefsforced choicein a trend series
legal self-identification of gender

Do you think a person should or should not be able to legally self-identify as a gender different from the one they were assigned at birth?

Should be allowed 40%38% Should not be allowed

neutral — balanced should/should not with an explicit Don't know

Identity beliefsagree/disagreein a trend series
agreement that a transgender woman is a woman

Statement: A transgender woman is a woman

Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

Agree 37%46% Disagree

Wording notes: bare agree/disagree with no strength scale | acquiescence-prone format

neutral — unbalanced agree/disagree statement rather than a two-sided choice

Sportsforced choicein a trend series
trans women in women's sporting events

Battery item: Take part in women's sporting events?

Do you think transgender women should or should not be allowed to...

Should be allowed 29%54% Should not be allowed

Wording notes: asks separately about transgender women and transgender men, which most US pollsters do not do | British-origin wording ('toilets', 'refuges') used in a US sample

neutral — symmetric should/should not; the parallel men/women design is itself the point of the battery and shows consistently higher permissiveness toward transgender men

Sportsforced choicein a trend series
trans men in men's sporting events

Battery item: Take part in men's sporting events?

Do you think transgender men should or should not be allowed to...

Should be allowed 35%47% Should not be allowed

Wording notes: asks separately about transgender women and transgender men, which most US pollsters do not do | British-origin wording ('toilets', 'refuges') used in a US sample

neutral — symmetric should/should not; the parallel men/women design is itself the point of the battery and shows consistently higher permissiveness toward transgender men

Bathrooms & facilitiesforced choicein a trend series
post-surgery status and changing-room access (trans women)

Battery item: Use women's changing rooms?

Do you think a transgender woman who has not had gender reassignment surgery should or should not be allowed to...

Should be allowed 31%51% Should not be allowed

Wording notes: introduces surgical status as a condition on facility access | term 'gender reassignment surgery' rather than 'gender-affirming surgery'

neutral — the surgical-status condition is the experimental manipulation; support drops about 6-7 points versus the unconditional item, which is the finding

Bathrooms & facilitiesforced choicein a trend series
post-surgery status and changing-room access (trans men)

Battery item: Use men's changing rooms?

Do you think a transgender man who has not had gender reassignment surgery should or should not be allowed to...

Should be allowed 33%49% Should not be allowed

Wording notes: introduces surgical status as a condition on facility access | term 'gender reassignment surgery' rather than 'gender-affirming surgery'

neutral — the surgical-status condition is the experimental manipulation; support drops about 6-7 points versus the unconditional item, which is the finding

Bathrooms & facilitiesforced choicein a trend series
perceived risk of harm from trans women in women's spaces

Do you believe that allowing transgender women to use spaces reserved for women, such as women's toilets or changing rooms, does or does not present any genuine risk of harm to women?

Does present a genuine risk of harm
40%
Does not present any genuine risk of harm
36%
Don't know
24%

Wording notes: imports the 'risk of harm to women' frame directly from British gender-critical campaigning | no parallel item asks about risk of harm to transgender people

loaded_terms — the item presupposes that 'risk of harm to women' is the relevant frame for facility access and offers no counterpart about harm to trans people; the phrase 'genuine risk of harm' is a campaigning formulation rather than a neutral description, though the two response options themselves are symmetric

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →