online opt-in

YouGov

The Economist/YouGov Poll · Apr 8–11, 2023 · US national

Methodology

Pollster
YouGov commercial
Sponsor
The Economist
Commissioned by
The Economist
Fielded
Apr 8–11, 2023
Population
adult citizens
Sample size
1,500
Sample frame
online opt-in
Panel
YouGov Panel
Mode
Web-based interviews; respondents selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of adult U.S. citizens
Margin of error
±3.1% (adjusted for weighting)
Weighting
The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2020 election turnout and Presidential vote, baseline party identification, and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Baseline party identification is the respondent's most recent answer given prior to June 1, 2022, and is weighted to the estimated distribution at that time (34% Democratic, 31% Republican).
Geography
US national
Base notes
1,322 registered voters

Sources

Verification note. Full topline/crosstab PDF downloaded and text-extracted; totals and Party ID columns read directly. All party columns sum to 99-101%.

Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.

Questions asked (4)

General acceptance4-point scalein a trend series
perceived level of discrimination against transgender people

How much discrimination do you think there is against people who are transgender in the United States today?

A lot
44%
A little
32%
None
13%
Not sure
11%

neutral — direct, balanced amount-scale; distinct from the multi-group discrimination battery used in 2021-2022

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupA lotA littleNoneNot sure
Democrat64%24%6%5%
Independent45%30%12%13%
Republican19%43%23%16%
General acceptanceforced choicein a trend series
whether society has gone too far in accepting transgender people

Which of the following statements comes closer to your feelings?

Not gone far enough
33%
Gone too far
32%
About right
18%
Not sure
16%

Wording notes: three-option too far / about right / not far enough frame

neutral — symmetric three-way frame with an explicit middle and a Not sure

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupGone too farAbout rightNot gone far enoughNot sure
Democrat13%22%52%13%
Independent28%20%32%20%
Republican58%13%13%16%
Political salienceforced choicein a trend series
whether state lawmakers focus too much on transgender school legislation

Compared to other issues, do you think that lawmakers in your state are focusing too much or too little on legislation relating to transgender children in schools?

Focusing too much
32%
Focusing about the right amount
27%
Focusing too little
18%
Not sure
24%

Wording notes: too much / too little is directionally ambiguous - too much can mean either stop legislating or stop being permissive

unclear — the item cannot distinguish respondents who want fewer restrictions from those who think the topic is over-covered; near-identical Dem/Rep too much shares (34/32) indicate the two parties may be answering different questions

Subgroup figures (12)

party

GroupFocusing too muchFocusing about the right amountFocusing too littleNot sure
Democrat34%32%17%18%
Independent29%24%16%31%
Republican32%25%21%22%
Sportssupport/opposein a trend series
transgender student athletes on teams matching gender identity

Support or Opposition on Transgender Issues -- Allowing transgender student athletes to play on sports teams that match their gender identity, rather than the gender they were assigned at birth

Do you support or oppose...?

Support 32%55% Oppose

Wording notes: affirming direction is the support side

neutral — standard support/oppose with balanced four-point scale plus Not sure

Subgroup figures (15)

party

GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeNot sure
Democrat25%27%15%17%16%
Independent14%16%11%43%15%
Republican6%8%10%72%5%

Every figure on this page is transcribed from the source linked above. How to read this data →