online opt-in
YouGov
The Economist/YouGov Poll · Apr 8–11, 2023 · US national
Methodology
- Pollster
- YouGov commercial
- Sponsor
- The Economist
- Commissioned by
- The Economist
- Fielded
- Apr 8–11, 2023
- Population
- adult citizens
- Sample size
- 1,500
- Sample frame
- online opt-in
- Panel
- YouGov Panel
- Mode
- Web-based interviews; respondents selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of adult U.S. citizens
- Margin of error
- ±3.1% (adjusted for weighting)
- Weighting
- The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2020 election turnout and Presidential vote, baseline party identification, and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Baseline party identification is the respondent's most recent answer given prior to June 1, 2022, and is weighted to the estimated distribution at that time (34% Democratic, 31% Republican).
- Geography
- US national
- Base notes
- 1,322 registered voters
Sources
Verification note. Full topline/crosstab PDF downloaded and text-extracted; totals and Party ID columns read directly. All party columns sum to 99-101%.
Figures below are transcribed from these documents. Where they disagree with the source, the source governs.
Questions asked (4)
perceived level of discrimination against transgender people
How much discrimination do you think there is against people who are transgender in the United States today?
A lot
44%
A little
32%
None
13%
Not sure
11%
neutral — direct, balanced amount-scale; distinct from the multi-group discrimination battery used in 2021-2022
Subgroup figures (12)
whether society has gone too far in accepting transgender people
Which of the following statements comes closer to your feelings?
Not gone far enough
33%
Gone too far
32%
About right
18%
Not sure
16%
Wording notes: three-option too far / about right / not far enough frame
neutral — symmetric three-way frame with an explicit middle and a Not sure
Subgroup figures (12)
whether state lawmakers focus too much on transgender school legislation
Compared to other issues, do you think that lawmakers in your state are focusing too much or too little on legislation relating to transgender children in schools?
Focusing too much
32%
Focusing about the right amount
27%
Focusing too little
18%
Not sure
24%
Wording notes: too much / too little is directionally ambiguous - too much can mean either stop legislating or stop being permissive
unclear — the item cannot distinguish respondents who want fewer restrictions from those who think the topic is over-covered; near-identical Dem/Rep too much shares (34/32) indicate the two parties may be answering different questions
Subgroup figures (12)
transgender student athletes on teams matching gender identity
Support or Opposition on Transgender Issues -- Allowing transgender student athletes to play on sports teams that match their gender identity, rather than the gender they were assigned at birth
Do you support or oppose...?
Wording notes: affirming direction is the support side
neutral — standard support/oppose with balanced four-point scale plus Not sure
Subgroup figures (15)