Executive Order 14168 sec. 4(d) directs that federal "intimate spaces" be designated by sex, and sec. 3(f) orders corrective Bostock guidance
- Date
- Actor
- President Donald J. Trump / The White House
- Agency
- Executive Office of the President (EOP)
- Type
- Executive order
Summary
Section 4(d) of EO 14168 orders each federal agency to "effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity." Section 2 defines "sex" as an "immutable biological classification as either male or female" that "does not include the concept of 'gender identity,'" and defines "female" and "male" by reference to which reproductive cell a person "belong[s], at conception," to the sex that produces. Section 3(f) directs the Attorney General to "immediately issue guidance to agencies to correct the misapplication" of Bostock v. Clayton County to sex-based distinctions in agency activities; a related provision directs guidance protecting "the right to single-sex spaces in workplaces and federally funded entities covered by the Civil Rights Act of 1964." Section 7(c) directs agencies to rescind all guidance documents inconsistent with the order. This is the operative source of every directive below.
Status
In effect. Section 4(d) as applied to federal-workplace restrooms is under direct challenge in Withrow v. United States (D.D.C.) and is the stated basis for the TSA policy challenged in Mittereder (E.D. Va.). Several courts have found EO 14168 animus-based in other applications (Washington v. Trump, W.D. Wash.; Talbott v. Trump, D.D.C.; PFLAG v. Trump, D. Md.). (See also section 1.)
As recorded in the data of . Check the sources for anything newer.
Related litigation
-
Challenged in
-
Challenged in
-
Challenged in
State of Washington v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
-
Challenged in
CourtListener docket 71978322
-
Challenged in
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
-
Challenged in
CourtListener docket 73568402
-
Challenged in
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
-
Challenged in
Washington Farmland Trust v. United States Department of Agriculture
-
Challenged in
-
Related case
-
Related case
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association v. Kennedy, Jr.
-
Related case
Massachusetts Fair Housing Center v. The Department of Housing and Urban Development
-
Related case
-
Related case
-
Related case
Rhode Island Coalition for Children and Families v. Kennedy, Jr.
Documents
-
Exec. Order No. 14,168, 90 Fed. Reg. 8615 (Jan. 30, 2025).
Sources
- courtlistener.com/docket/71939878/withrow-v-united-states-of-america(opens another site)
- federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/30/2025-02090/defending-women-from-gender…(opens another site)
Cite this action
Exec. Order No. 14,168, 90 Fed. Reg. 8615 (Jan. 30, 2025).
Short form: Exec. Order No. 14,168, 90 Fed. Reg. at 8615.