Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the
address updates so any view can be shared.
Marquette Law School PollSportsJul 7–12, 2023policy proposal: require transgender athletes to compete on teams matching sex assigned at birth
[Require that transgender athletes compete on teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with] Which of the following proposals would you favor and which would you oppose?
Wording notes: uses 'the sex they were assigned at birth'restrictive alternative is the only one statedno middle option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Marquette Law School PollYouth medical careJul 7–12, 2023 policy proposal: ban gender-affirming care such as hormone therapy or surgery for minors under 18
[Ban "gender-affirming" care such as hormone therapy or surgery for transgender minors under 18] Which of the following proposals would you favor and which would you oppose?
Wording notes: scare quotes around "gender-affirming"names hormone therapy and surgery but not puberty blockersrestrictive alternative is the only one statedno middle option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
RWRedfield & Wilton Strategiesfor NewsweekPronouns & languageJul 6, 2023
whether misgendering should be a criminal offense
Referring to someone by the wrong gender pronoun (he/him, she/her) should be a criminal offense
Base: 1,500 eligible voters in the United States.
Wording notes: tests a maximalist policy (criminal offense) that no U.S. jurisdiction has enacteddoes not distinguish deliberate from accidental misgendering
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Agree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Don't know
RWRedfield & Wilton Strategiesfor NewsweekPronouns & languageparaphrasedJul 6, 2023
whether the respondent would use she/her for a transgender woman on request
[stem not published] whether the respondent would call someone who was previously male "she/her" if requested
Base: 1,500 eligible voters in the United States.
Wording notes: describes the person as 'previously male' rather than as a transgender womanoffers a conditional 'depends on the person' option taken by more than a quarter
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Would use she/her
- Would continue to use he/his
- Depends on the person
- Don't know
RWRedfield & Wilton Strategiesfor NewsweekPronouns & languageparaphrasedJul 6, 2023
whether the respondent would use he/him for a transgender man on request
[stem not published] whether the respondent would refer to someone born female who wanted to be referred to as "he/him" that way
Base: 1,500 eligible voters in the United States.
Wording notes: describes the person as 'born female' rather than as a transgender man
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Would follow the request
- Would refuse
- Depends on the person
- Unsure
Echelon InsightsSportsJun 26–29, 2023paired-statement choice on whether trans athletes may play on teams matching gender identity
Paired-statement battery: respondents chose which of two statements they agreed with and how strongly.
1. Transgender athletes should be able to play on sports teams that match their current gender identity / 2. Transgender athletes should only be allowed to play on sports teams that match their birth gender
Strongly/somewhat agree with Option 2 (teams matching birth gender)
65%
Strongly agree with Option 2
52%
Strongly/somewhat agree with Option 1 (teams matching current gender identity)
25%
Strongly agree with Option 1
14%
Somewhat agree with Option 2
14%
Somewhat agree with Option 1
11%
Unsure
10%
- Sample
- 1,020 likely voters · ±3.9 percentage points
- Method
- online opt-in
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: paired-statement forced choice with no middle option, so respondents who would restrict some levels of competition but not others must pick a side'birth gender' rather than 'birth sex' - contested, but symmetric with 'current gender identity'no age, sport or level of competition specifiedembedded in a long ideological paired-statement battery covering abortion, guns, immigration, hate speech and policing, which invites answering by ideological identity rather than by considering the specific case
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree with Option 1
- Somewhat agree with Option 1
- Somewhat agree with Option 2
- Strongly agree with Option 2
- Unsure
Morning ConsultYouth medical careparaphrasedJun 16–18, 2023whether gender-transitioning care for children is a major threat
Thinking specifically about social issues, is each of the following a major threat to the United States?
Allowing children to receive gender-transitioning care
Wording notes: 'threat to the United States' is an extreme frame applied to a medical decision'gender-transitioning care' is the pollster's term, not the clinical oneonly the 'major threat' share is published; the full response scale is not shownasked only of potential Republican primary voters
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Morning ConsultSportsparaphrasedJun 16–18, 2023 whether trans athletes in college sports are a major threat
Thinking specifically about social issues, is each of the following a major threat to the United States?
Permitting transgender athletes to participate in college sports
Wording notes: 'threat to the United States' frameonly the major-threat share is publishedasked only of potential Republican primary voters
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Harvard CAPS/HarrisYouth medical careJun 14–15, 2023age limit on gender surgery and puberty blockers
Do you think that surgery to change gender and puberty blockers should be allowed for minors under 18 or only be allowed for people over 18 years old in your state?
Base: Unweighted and weighted base 2,090.
Wording notes: bundles surgery and puberty blockers into a single stimulus, though the two have very different prevalence in minorsno 'not sure' optionno mention of parental or clinical involvement
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Allowed for minors
- Only be allowed for people over 18 years old
Harvard CAPS/HarrisParental rightsJun 14–15, 2023 youth gender care without parental permission
Do you favor or oppose a law in your state that would allow gender changing surgery and puberty blockers for minors without parental permission?
Base: Unweighted and weighted base 2,090.
Wording notes: bundles surgery and puberty blockers'without parental permission' describes a policy essentially no U.S. state has enactedno 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
CBS News/YouGovPolitical salienceJun 7–10, 2023importance to GOP primary voters that the 2024 nominee limit the rights of transgender people
How important is it that the 2024 Republican nominee...
How important is it that the 2024 Republican nominee... Limit rights of transgender people
Base: Full sample 2,480 U.S. adults; this item was asked among likely Republican primary voters (weighted N=588)
Wording notes: item explicitly framed as limiting rights, not as 'protecting' anythingbattery item alongside taxes, inflation, abortion, Ukraine and Russia items
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Very important
- Somewhat important
- Not important
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersIdentity beliefsJun 5–6, 2023
agreement that science proves there are only two genders
Please let me know if you agree or disagree with each of the following statements:
Science proves that there are only two genders, male and female.
Wording notes: asserts a scientific consensus as the premise of the statement, so disagreeing reads as denying science rather than as holding a different view of the sex/gender distinctionconflates 'sex' and 'gender' in a battery where the distinction is the whole issueembedded in a battery otherwise about sexual morality, religion and the Bible, which primes a traditionalist frame
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Not sure
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersBooks & mediaJun 5–6, 2023
children's clothing stores displaying signs promoting the idea that children can choose their own genders
Think for a moment about stores that sell children's clothing. Is it appropriate for such stores to display clothing and signs promoting the idea that children can choose their own genders?
Wording notes: 'promoting the idea that children can choose their own genders' is an opponents' characterization of Pride merchandising, not a neutral description'choose their own genders' implies volition, which is contestedfielded weeks after the Target Pride-collection backlash, unmentioned in the stem
Response options as the pollster wrote them
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersGeneral acceptanceJun 5–6, 2023
whether discomfort with transgender people makes someone a bigot
Many people are uncomfortable with the idea of a biological male who identifies as a female and dresses as a woman. Does being uncomfortable with the idea of transgender people mean someone is a bigot?
Wording notes: opens by normalizing the attitude under test ('Many people are uncomfortable')'bigot' is a maximally pejorative label, so the affirming answer requires endorsing an insult toward the 'many people' just described'a biological male who identifies as a female and dresses as a woman' reduces trans women to presentation and is the only description offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersContact & populationJun 5–6, 2023
knowing a close friend or family member with a gender identity different from their gender at birth
Do you have any close friends or family members who claim gender identities that are different from their genders at birth?
Wording notes: 'claim gender identities' rather than 'have' or 'identify with' casts the identity as an assertion of doubtful standing
Response options as the pollster wrote them
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersIdentity beliefsJun 5–6, 2023
agreement that science proves there are only two genders
Please let me know if you agree or disagree with each of the following statements:
Please let me know if you agree or disagree with each of the following statements: Science proves that there are only two genders, male and female.
Wording notes: asserts a scientific consensus inside the statement rather than asking what the respondent believes'genders' rather than 'sexes', so the statement claims science settles a question about genderagree-only statement format with no counter-statement offered, which invites acquiescence
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Not sure
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research (Global Strategy Group and GBAO)Contact & populationJun 2–5, 2023knowing a transgender person
As far as you know, do any of your friends, family, or co-workers consider themselves transgender?
Base: 1,373 total interviews with a 1,001 base; oversamples of 265 African Americans, 234 Hispanics, 94 AAPI, and 254 pure independents. Q67 and Q68 were each split-sampled into A and B forms.
Wording notes: 'as far as you know' and 'consider themselves transgender' phrasingno don't-know option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research (Global Strategy Group and GBAO)Political salienceJun 2–5, 2023 awareness of state legislation on transgender people
How much have you seen, read, or heard about some states in the U.S. passing or debating laws regarding transgender people?
Base: 1,373 total interviews with a 1,001 base; oversamples of 265 African Americans, 234 Hispanics, 94 AAPI, and 254 pure independents. Q67 and Q68 were each split-sampled into A and B forms.
Wording notes: identical wording to the June 2024 wave, enabling a two-point trend
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research (Global Strategy Group and GBAO)Youth medical careJun 2–5, 2023 message test - 'protect kids from woke ideology' vs. rights-and-freedoms or trust-families rebuttals
[SPLIT A] Which side do you agree with more? - Those who say we need to protect kids from woke ideology and ban sex change hormones and gender reassignment surgery for kids - Those who say we need to protect the rights and freedoms of transgender youth, their families, and their doctors to seek and provide medically necessary care and to live free from discrimination [SPLIT B] Which side do you agree with more? - Those who say we should trust families and their doctors to make health care decisions for themselves and their children, and not allow politicians and the government to insert themselves into those decisions - Those who say we need to protect kids from woke ideology and ban sex change hormones and gender reassignment surgery for kids
Trust families and their doctors to make health care decisions
56%
Protect kids from woke ideology and ban sex change hormones and gender reassignment surgery for kids
51%
Protect the rights and freedoms of transgender youth, their families, and their doctors
49%
Like the American Medical Association - gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based, and improves health
49%
Opponents of transgender youth are stirring up panic in order to divide us, score political points, and maintain their power
49%
Protect kids from woke ideology and ban sex change hormones and gender reassignment surgery for kids
44%
- Sample
- 1,373 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
- Method
- online opt-in
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 13 subgroup figures
Base: 1,373 total interviews with a 1,001 base; oversamples of 265 African Americans, 234 Hispanics, 94 AAPI, and 254 pure independents. Q67 and Q68 were each split-sampled into A and B forms.
Wording notes: restrictive statement uses 'woke ideology', 'sex change hormones', and 'gender reassignment surgery'no don't-know option - the two sides always sum to 100the restrictive statement's position in the pair is rotated between splits
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research (Global Strategy Group and GBAO)School policyJun 2–5, 2023 DeSantis vs. Disney over the "Don't Say Gay" law
As you may know, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis passed a "Don't Say Gay" bill prohibiting teachers from talking about sexual orientation or gender identity in schools, which Disney spoke out against.
As you may know, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis passed a "Don't Say Gay" bill prohibiting teachers from talking about sexual orientation or gender identity in schools, which Disney spoke out against. As a result, Ron DeSantis stripped Disney of its long-standing special tax status in Florida and threatened to build a state prison next to Disney World in Florida. Disney is now suing Ron DeSantis as a result. Which side do you agree with more?
Disney is in the right (strongly)
36%
Ron DeSantis is in the right (strongly)
18%
Disney is in the right (somewhat)
14%
Ron DeSantis is in the right (somewhat)
14%
Don't know enough to say
17%
- Sample
- 1,373 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
- Method
- online opt-in
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 4 subgroup figures
Base: 1,373 total interviews with a 1,001 base; oversamples of 265 African Americans, 234 Hispanics, 94 AAPI, and 254 pure independents. Q67 and Q68 were each split-sampled into A and B forms.
Wording notes: uses the opponents' nickname "Don't Say Gay" rather than the statute's own namethe preamble narrates DeSantis's retaliation, including the prison threat, before asking
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Disney is in the right - feel this way strongly
- Disney is in the right - feel this way somewhat
- Ron DeSantis is in the right - feel this way somewhat
- Ron DeSantis is in the right - feel this way strongly
- Don't know enough to say
PRRINondiscriminationdata flagJun 2023 – Jun 30, 2023LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q6. Do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE STATEMENTS]
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIPolitical saliencedata flagJun 2023 – Jun 30, 2023 how much LGBTQ rights would drive a vote for major political office (LGBTQ-general item, not transgender-specific)
Q12. Thinking about how the following issues might affect your vote for major political offices, would you:
LGBTQ rights
Consider a candidate's position on this issue as just one of many important factors
38%
Only vote for a candidate who shares your views on this issue
35%
Not see this as a major issue
26%
Skipped/Refused
1%
- Sample
- adults
- Method
- probability panel
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record
Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.
Wording notes: names 'LGBTQ rights' as a bloc rather than any transgender-specific policydoes not distinguish salience for supporters from salience for opponents
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Only vote for a candidate who shares your views on this issue
- Consider a candidate's position on this issue as just one of many important factors
- Not see this as a major issue
- Skipped/Refused
SoonerPollSchool policyJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023teachers helping students under 16 transition without parental consent
Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE teachers guiding or helping their STUDENTS UNDER THE AGE OF 16 transition to the opposite sex without parental consent or knowledge?
Wording notes: uses 'transition to the opposite sex'stacks 'without parental consent or knowledge' onto the transition itemcapitalised emphasis in the stimulus
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
SoonerPollDrag & public expressionJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023 public drag performances where children under 12 may be present
Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE the public display of DRAG SHOWS, a form of entertainment performed by drag artists with men dressed as women and vice versa, where CHILDREN under the age of 12 may be present at schools, libraries, or other public places?
Wording notes: defines drag inside the stimulusconditions the item on children under 12 being presentcapitalised emphasis on CHILDREN
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
SoonerPollSchool policyJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023 teaching gender identity to children under 12
Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE the teaching of gender identity to children under the age of 12?
Wording notes: 'teaching of gender identity' is undefinedage condition attached
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
SoonerPollYouth medical careJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023 making castration illegal for healthy minors
Castration, which is the removal of the testicles from a biologically-born male, thereby permanently eliminating one's ability to father a child.
Wording notes: asked under the stem 'SUPPORT OR OPPOSE MAKING IT ILLEGAL''physically healthy children or minors' framingprocedure described in graphic surgical termsuses 'biologically-born male'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
SoonerPollYouth medical careJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023 making vasectomy illegal for healthy minors
Vasectomy, a surgery conducted in biologically-born males to prevent them from fathering a child in the future.
Wording notes: asked under the stem 'SUPPORT OR OPPOSE MAKING IT ILLEGAL''physically healthy children or minors' framinguses 'biologically-born males'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
SoonerPollYouth medical careJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023 making hysterectomy illegal for healthy minors
Hysterectomy, which is the removal of all or part of the uterus in biologically-born females, thereby permanently preventing one's ability to ever become pregnant.
Wording notes: asked under the stem 'SUPPORT OR OPPOSE MAKING IT ILLEGAL''physically healthy children or minors' framinguses 'biologically-born females'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
SoonerPollYouth medical careJun 2023 – Jun 4, 2023 making mastectomy illegal for healthy minors
Mastectomy, which is the complete or partial removal of breast tissue from biologically-born females.
Wording notes: asked under the stem 'SUPPORT OR OPPOSE MAKING IT ILLEGAL''physically healthy children or minors' framinguses 'biologically-born females'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
- Somewhat support
- Don't know
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose it being made ILLEGAL for healthy children or minors to receive
Texas Politics Project (UT-Austin)Youth medical careJun 2023minors (no age threshold named); umbrella term 'gender-affirming care'; BAN framing directed at doctors; retrospective legislative framing
Below are some proposals that the Texas Legislature considered this year. Please tell us whether you would support or oppose each of the following?
Below are some proposals that the Texas Legislature considered this year. Please tell us whether you would support or oppose each of the following? Prohibiting doctors from providing gender-affirming care to minors.
Wording notes: BAN framing (support = restrict)umbrella term, no treatment namedtargets doctorsthe stem now attributes the proposal to the Texas Legislature, adding an in-group/out-group partisan cue absent in Aprilno age threshold
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Don't know/No opinion
YouGovfor The EconomistGeneral acceptanceMay 27–31, 2023perceived level of discrimination against transgender people
How much discrimination do you think there is against people who are transgender in the United States today?
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- A lot
- A little
- None
- Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistPolitical salienceMay 27–31, 2023 whether state lawmakers focus too much on transgender school legislation
Compared to other issues, do you think that lawmakers in your state are focusing too much or too little on legislation relating to transgender children in schools?
Wording notes: 'too much / too little' is directionally ambiguous
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Focusing too much
- Focusing about the right amount
- Focusing too little
- Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistParty & candidate handlingMay 27–31, 2023 whether Biden cares about LGBT people's needs
How much do you think Joe Biden cares about the needs and problems of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people?
Wording notes: bundles LGBT into one group, so it does not isolate transgender-specific perceptions
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- A lot
- Some
- Not much
- Not at all
YouGovfor The EconomistParty & candidate handlingMay 27–31, 2023 approval of Biden's handling of LGBT issues
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Joe Biden has been handling gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender issues?
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly approve
- Somewhat approve
- Somewhat disapprove
- Strongly disapprove
- Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistParty & candidate handlingMay 27–31, 2023 approval of Trump's handling of LGBT issues
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump handled gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender issues during his presidency?
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly approve
- Somewhat approve
- Somewhat disapprove
- Strongly disapprove
- Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistParty & candidate handlingMay 27–31, 2023 approval of DeSantis's handling of LGBT issues
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Ron DeSantis has handled gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender issues as governor of Florida?
Wording notes: fielded a week after DeSantis signed Florida's 2023 gender-affirming-care and bathroom bills and days after his presidential launch
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly approve
- Somewhat approve
- Somewhat disapprove
- Strongly disapprove
- Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistParty & candidate handlingMay 27–31, 2023 which party's president would be better for LGBT people
Would gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people be better off if a Democrat or a Republican were president?
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Democrat
- Republican
- No difference
- Not sure
Rasmussen ReportsIdentity beliefsMay 24–25, 2023belief that there are two genders
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: "There are two genders, male and female"?
Wording notes: single-statement agree/disagree format invites acquiescence biasno counter-statement offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Not sure
Ipsosfor AxiosIdentity beliefsMay 12–15, 2023whether people should be able to decide their own gender identity
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? People should be able to decide for themselves their gender identity
Base: The published topline reports wave-level totals only; no party or demographic crosstabs are printed. Ipsos's own writeup states that party gaps on these items run 35-40 percentage points or more, but does not publish the underlying figures.
Wording notes: offers a true midpoint, taken by 24% - a quarter of adults decline to take a side on the foundational questionpaired with an otherwise identical item substituting 'Teenagers' for 'People', which makes it a clean age manipulationthe response distribution is strongly bimodal: 28% strongly agree, 24% strongly disagree, with only 16% and 7% in the 'somewhat' categories
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Skipped
Ipsosfor AxiosIdentity beliefsMay 12–15, 2023 whether teenagers should be able to decide their own gender identity
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Teenagers should be able to decide for themselves their gender identity
Total Strongly agree / Somewhat agree 33%
- Sample
- 1,095 adults · +/- 3.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level for the entire sample of adults (design-effect adjusted)
- Method
- probability panel
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Base: The published topline reports wave-level totals only; no party or demographic crosstabs are printed. Ipsos's own writeup states that party gaps on these items run 35-40 percentage points or more, but does not publish the underlying figures.
Wording notes: differs from the adult version only in the subject noun - a deliberate within-battery age manipulation'Teenagers' is unqualified as to age, covering both 13-year-olds and 19-year-oldsconcerns identity self-definition, not medical intervention - a distinction the public debate frequently collapses
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Skipped