Explore the polling

Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the address updates so any view can be shared.

Clear

24 questions from 4 polls

Impact Researchfor Third WayParty & candidate handlingparaphrasedMar 18–23, 2025
exposure, party trust, and which party is more extreme

[Third Way describes items on how much respondents have heard about transgender issues recently, which party they trust more to handle transgender issues, and which party is more extreme on these issues]

Heard a lot or some about transgender issues recently
78%
Republicans are more extreme on these issues
54%
Trust Democrats more to handle transgender issues
46%
Trust Republicans more to handle transgender issues
41%
Democrats are more extreme on these issues
36%
Sample
800 likely midterm general election voters · ±3.5 percentage points
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Accompanied by two in-person ethnographic focus groups in Atlanta and four virtual focus groups among battleground-state swing voters, all in February 2025.

Wording notes: question wording not published
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Democrats
  • Republicans
Impact Researchfor Third WayAdult medical careMar 18–23, 2025
prohibiting gender-affirming care at any age

prohibiting medical providers from providing gender-affirming health care to anyone of any age, including adults

Net oppose prohibiting providers from providing gender-affirming care to anyone of any age (points)
13%
Sample
800 likely midterm general election voters · ±3.5 percentage points
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two in-person ethnographic focus groups in Atlanta and four virtual focus groups among battleground-state swing voters, all in February 2025.

Wording notes: the policy is stated in its maximal form ('anyone of any age, including adults')
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphrasedMar 18–23, 2025
vote effect of a candidate who would bar federal programs from covering under-19 transgender care

[Third Way describes the item as asking about] an elected official that supported prohibiting access to transgender health care in federally funded programs like Medicaid, Medicare, and TRICARE for patients under the age of 19

More likely to support such a candidate
39%
Less likely to support such a candidate
37%
No impact
15%
Sample
800 likely midterm general election voters · ±3.5 percentage points
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Accompanied by two in-person ethnographic focus groups in Atlanta and four virtual focus groups among battleground-state swing voters, all in February 2025.

Wording notes: names the specific federal programs
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • More likely to support
  • Less likely to support
  • No impact
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careMar 18–23, 2025
three-way item separating personal view from support for a federal coverage ban

I personally support transgender health care for patients under the age of 19 and do not believe that the government should block federally-funded insurance programs from providing coverage for that care. OR I do not personally support transgender health care for patients under the age of 19 but do not believe that the government should block federally-funded insurance programs from providing coverage for that care. OR I do not personally support transgender health care for patients under the age of 19 and believe that the government should block federally-funded insurance programs from providing coverage for that care.

Combined opposition to banning ALL insurance programs from covering this care for young people (parallel item)
54%
Combined opposition to a federal coverage block
49%
Personally oppose the care and support a federal coverage block
42%
Combined support for banning ALL insurance programs from covering this care for young people
39%
Personally support the care and oppose a federal coverage block
31%
Personally oppose the care but oppose a federal coverage block
18%
Sample
800 likely midterm general election voters · ±3.5 percentage points
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two in-person ethnographic focus groups in Atlanta and four virtual focus groups among battleground-state swing voters, all in February 2025.

Wording notes: no fourth option for 'personally support the care but support a coverage block'the design lets respondents register personal disapproval while opposing government action
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Personally support and oppose a block
  • Personally oppose but oppose a block
  • Personally oppose and support a block
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careparaphrasedMar 18–23, 2025
post-message movement on funding bans and provider coercion

Regardless of how we feel personally about the issue, parents of transgender young people should have the right to make personal medical decisions with their families and their doctors just like every other parent... Politicians should be focused on getting things in this country back on track, not messing with Medicare and Medicaid... America was founded on the basic principle of freedom, and that freedom should be for everyone.

[Third Way reports post-message results after respondents heard a three-pronged argument combining parental rights, economic priorities, and a freedom frame]

Support 90%94% Oppose
Sample
800 likely midterm general election voters · ±3.5 percentage points
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two in-person ethnographic focus groups in Atlanta and four virtual focus groups among battleground-state swing voters, all in February 2025.

Wording notes: post-message measurement - respondents heard only pro-access arguments before the re-askno counter-messaging round is reported for these items
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careMar 18–23, 2025
binary statement choice on cutting federal funding to hospitals that provide under-19 transgender care

a policy that blocks all federal dollars from flowing to any hospital or hospital system that offers any transgender health care to patients under the age of 19

Politicians should be focused on issues that affect all Americans, like fixing the economy and addressing inflation instead of cutting federal funding for health care providers and raising health care costs for all patients; OR These federal funding cuts are necessary in order to bring down government spending and prevent taxpayer dollars from being used in elective procedures that young people may come to regret.

Politicians should focus on the economy instead of cutting federal funding for health care providers
51%
These federal funding cuts are necessary
37%
Sample
800 likely midterm general election voters · ±3.5 percentage points
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Accompanied by two in-person ethnographic focus groups in Atlanta and four virtual focus groups among battleground-state swing voters, all in February 2025.

Wording notes: the pro-access statement leads with the economy rather than defending the carethe restrictive statement calls the care 'elective procedures that young people may come to regret'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Statement 1
  • Statement 2
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
exposure and desired volume of state legislation

[Third Way describes items asking how much respondents had heard about transgender issues in the past few months, and whether they want more, fewer, or the same number of laws relating to transgender people in their state]

Heard a lot or some about transgender issues in the past few months
86%
Want fewer laws relating to transgender people in their state
37%
Think there are the right number of laws already
24%
Want more laws relating to transgender people in their state
19%
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 2 subgroup figures

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: question wording not publishedthe laws item offers a symmetric more/fewer/same option set, which is unusual and better than most versions of this question
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A lot
  • Some
  • A little
  • Nothing
Impact Researchfor Third WaySchool policyparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
support for allowing transgender youth to do specific things

[Third Way describes items asking whether respondents support allowing transgender youth to: seek counseling from a therapist; dress in ways that align with their gender identity; use pronouns that align with their gender identity; use restrooms in public places designated for the gender with which they identify; use school restrooms and locker rooms designated for the gender with which they identify]

Support allowing transgender youth to seek counseling from a therapist
81%
Support allowing transgender youth to dress in ways that align with their gender identity
68%
Support allowing transgender youth to use pronouns that align with their gender identity
55%
Support allowing transgender youth to use public restrooms designated for the gender with which they identify
39%
Support allowing transgender youth to use school restrooms and locker rooms designated for the gender with which they identify
34%
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: question wording not published'allow' framing throughout, which tends to raise support relative to a 'ban' framing
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
framing experiment - banning providers vs. allowing parents and doctors to decide

[Third Way describes two framings: (a) banning health care professionals from providing gender-affirming care for trans youth; (b) allowing parents of a trans child and medical professionals to make decisions about it]

Support 105%80% Oppose
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: 'ban' vs. 'allow parents and doctors' framing of overlapping policy space
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
specific treatments - surgery and hormones/puberty blockers for under-18s

[Third Way describes items on: making gender reassignment surgery illegal for a trans person under the age of 18; allowing parents to approve gender reassignment surgery for their child if a doctor agrees; banning hormone therapy and puberty-delaying medication for transgender people under 18; allowing transgender youth to take doctor-prescribed medication with parental consent]

Support 127%98% Oppose
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: uses 'gender reassignment surgery', a term most clinicians no longer useeach treatment is asked in both a ban and an allow framing
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
concerns about the consequences of a ban

[Third Way describes items asking how much respondents were bothered by consequences of a ban, including preventing parents from getting mental health support for their child, jail time for parents, jail time for health care professionals, and CPS investigations of parents]

Bothered a great deal or some that a ban could prevent parents from getting their child mental health support and counseling
71%
Oppose prohibiting doctors from providing health care to transgender people according to the expert standards of care
65%
Bothered by requiring parents to serve jail time if they help their child access gender-affirming care
64%
Bothered by requiring health care professionals to serve jail time
61%
Bothered by requiring Child Protective Services to investigate parents for child abuse if they help their child access care
56%
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: one-directional battery of consequences a critic would emphasize
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Bothered a great deal
  • Bothered some
  • Bothered a little
  • Not bothered
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
three-way item separating personal view from support for a government ban

[Third Way describes a three-option item separating personal support for gender-affirming care for under-18s from belief that the government should ban it]

Personally oppose access for under-18s and support a government ban
40%
Personally support access for under-18s and oppose a government ban
32%
Personally oppose access for under-18s but oppose a government ban
23%
Total who say the government should not ban gender-affirming care 55%
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: deliberately separates personal disapproval from support for legal prohibitionno fourth cell for 'personally support access but support a ban'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Personally support access and oppose a government ban
  • Personally oppose access but oppose a government ban
  • Personally oppose access and support a government ban
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphrasedOct 25, 2023 – Nov 2023
vote effect of a candidate who wants to ban youth gender-affirming care

[Third Way describes items on whether a candidate's support for banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth makes respondents more or less likely to support them, and on whether they would only vote for a candidate who opposes or supports criminalization]

Less likely to support a candidate who wants to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth
43%
More likely to support such a candidate
34%
Would only vote for a candidate who opposes criminalizing gender-affirming care for trans youth
34%
Would not consider it a major issue in their voting decision
27%
Would only vote for a candidate who supports criminalization
26%
Sample
800 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Accompanied by two virtual focus groups with battleground-state swing voters (Oct. 2) and two in-person persuasion conversation groups in Detroit (Oct. 3).

Wording notes: question wording not published'criminalization' is a strong term used in the second version
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • More likely
  • Less likely
  • Would only vote for a candidate who opposes criminalization
  • Would only vote for a candidate who supports criminalization
  • Not a major issue in my voting decision
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphrasedApr 6–13, 2023
exposure to transgender issues

[Third Way describes the item as asking whether respondents had recently read or heard about transgender issues; 89% reported hearing 'a lot or some']

Heard a lot or some about transgender issues
89%
Sample
1,000 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national plus battleground congressional district oversample
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Plus an oversample of 400 battleground congressional district voters. The same project included two in-person ethnographic focus groups among Democratic base voters in the Philadelphia area and four focus groups among swing voters.

Wording notes: question wording not published
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A lot
  • Some
  • A little
  • Nothing
Impact Researchfor Third WayNondiscriminationparaphrasedApr 6–13, 2023
national nondiscrimination policy for transgender people

[Third Way describes the item as asking about] a national policy protecting transgender people from discrimination

Support a national policy protecting transgender people from discrimination (three-quarters)
75%
Sample
1,000 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national plus battleground congressional district oversample
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Plus an oversample of 400 battleground congressional district voters. The same project included two in-person ethnographic focus groups among Democratic base voters in the Philadelphia area and four focus groups among swing voters.

Wording notes: question wording not published
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WayYouth medical careparaphrasedApr 6–13, 2023
framing experiment - banning providers vs. banning parents

[Three differently framed versions of the same policy, described by Third Way as:] (a) banning health care professionals from providing gender-affirming care to youth (b) whether the parents of a 15-year-old transgender child should be allowed to help their child receive gender-affirming care (c) banning parents from getting their child gender-affirming care

Support 95%87% Oppose
Sample
1,000 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national plus battleground congressional district oversample
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Plus an oversample of 400 battleground congressional district voters. The same project included two in-person ethnographic focus groups among Democratic base voters in the Philadelphia area and four focus groups among swing voters.

Wording notes: deliberate framing experiment: the actor being restricted is varied from clinicians to parentsthe (b) version also introduces a specific age, so it is not a clean comparison - Third Way says so explicitly
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WaySportsparaphrasedApr 6–13, 2023
framing experiment - 'require birth sex teams' vs. 'ban from gender identity teams'

[Two differently framed versions of the same policy, described by Third Way as:] (a) requiring transgender student-athletes to compete on teams that match their biological sex (b) a ban on transgender youth competing on teams that match their gender identity

Support
63%
Support
55%
Sample
1,000 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national plus battleground congressional district oversample
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Plus an oversample of 400 battleground congressional district voters. The same project included two in-person ethnographic focus groups among Democratic base voters in the Philadelphia area and four focus groups among swing voters.

Wording notes: 'require' vs. 'ban' framing of an identical policy
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Impact Researchfor Third WaySportsparaphrasedApr 6–13, 2023
reactions to enforcement mechanisms in the "Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act"

We also asked voters specifically about the House Republicans' "Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act," which would ban transgender people from playing on girls' sports teams at any age or level.

[Third Way describes the items as asking how much respondents were bothered by specific enforcement requirements associated with the House Republicans' "Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act"]

Bothered a great deal or some by requiring girls to undergo genital inspections to prove they aren't transgender
78%
Bothered by requiring young girls to answer questions about puberty and how their bodies were changing
71%
Bothered by requiring girls to provide up-to-date information about how often and when they are having their period
70%
Net margin of support for the "Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act" as a named bill (points) 6%
Sample
1,000 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national plus battleground congressional district oversample
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Plus an oversample of 400 battleground congressional district voters. The same project included two in-person ethnographic focus groups among Democratic base voters in the Philadelphia area and four focus groups among swing voters.

Wording notes: the enforcement mechanisms described (genital inspections, puberty questions, menstrual records) are the most alarming implications of the billno counterbalancing items about the bill's stated purpose
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Bothered a great deal
  • Bothered some
  • Bothered a little
  • Not bothered
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphrasedApr 6–13, 2023
vote effect of supporting a sports ban

[Third Way describes the item as asking whether respondents are less likely to vote for a candidate who supports banning transgender student-athletes from participating in sports that align with their gender identity, or whether it has no impact]

Less likely to vote for a candidate who supports a sports ban, OR it has no impact on their vote (combined)
54%
Sample
1,000 likely 2024 voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national plus battleground congressional district oversample
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Plus an oversample of 400 battleground congressional district voters. The same project included two in-person ethnographic focus groups among Democratic base voters in the Philadelphia area and four focus groups among swing voters.

Wording notes: the reported figure combines 'less likely' with 'no impact', which is a favorable way to present the result for the client
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • More likely
  • Less likely
  • No impact
Impact Researchfor Third WaySportsparaphraseddata flag—
who should decide transgender youth sports participation

[Third Way describes the item as asking] who should be responsible for making decisions about transgender youth's participation in sports

Policymakers at the state or federal level (combined)
36%
Parents, doctors, or schools case-by-case (combined)
27%
Sports governing bodies like the NCAA
19%
State legislature
15%
Parents
11%
School districts or administrators
11%
Congress
8%
The Department of Education
7%
Governor
6%
Don't know
14%
Sample
1,012 likely midterm voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Part of a multi-round project that also included qualitative research; Third Way does not publish the qualitative group composition for this round.

Wording notes: question wording not published
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Sports governing bodies like the NCAA
  • State legislature
  • Governor
  • Congress
  • The Department of Education
  • Parents
  • School districts or administrators
  • Doctors
  • Don't know
Impact Researchfor Third WaySportsdata flag—
whether politicians or parents and schools should decide

The issue of transgender student-athletes is complicated and should not be up to politicians to decide. These decisions should be left to parents and schools who know the situation best. OR This is an important issue, and we need politicians to pass laws to protect non-transgender students from having to compete against someone of the opposite sex.

Complicated / should be left to parents and schools
51%
We need politicians to pass laws to protect non-transgender students
37%
Sample
1,012 likely midterm voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Part of a multi-round project that also included qualitative research; Third Way does not publish the qualitative group composition for this round.

Wording notes: restrictive statement uses 'someone of the opposite sex'affirming statement leads with 'complicated', which lowers the bar for choosing it
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Statement 1 (leave to parents and schools)
  • Statement 2 (politicians should pass laws)
Impact Researchfor Third WayParental rightsdata flag—
parents of transgender youth vs. 'political correctness' framing

Parents of transgender youth should be able to make the decisions that are best for their children without politicians interfering. OR Because of political correctness, parents have no say when transgender youth join their kids' sports teams, even when the transgender person has a clear, unfair advantage.

Parents of transgender youth should be able to make the decisions that are best for their children
53%
Because of political correctness, parents have no say
34%
Sample
1,012 likely midterm voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Part of a multi-round project that also included qualitative research; Third Way does not publish the qualitative group composition for this round.

Wording notes: restrictive statement uses 'political correctness' and asserts 'a clear, unfair advantage' as fact
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Statement 1
  • Statement 2
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphraseddata flag—
vote effect of supporting a sports ban

[Third Way describes the item as asking] whether a candidate's support for laws banning transgender youth from participating in sports consistent with their gender identity would make them more or less likely to vote for that policymaker

Less likely to vote for a candidate who supports a sports ban
35%
More likely to vote for a candidate who supports a sports ban
34%
Sample
1,012 likely midterm voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Part of a multi-round project that also included qualitative research; Third Way does not publish the qualitative group composition for this round.

Wording notes: question wording not published
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • More likely
  • Less likely
  • No impact
Impact Researchfor Third WayPolitical salienceparaphraseddata flag—
priority of LGBT-related laws relative to other issues

[Third Way describes the item as asking respondents to name first or second priorities among issues, including] laws related to gay and transgender people

Inflation as a priority
48%
Jobs and the economy as a priority
30%
Laws related to gay and transgender people as a first or second priority
3%
Sample
1,012 likely midterm voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Part of a multi-round project that also included qualitative research; Third Way does not publish the qualitative group composition for this round.

Wording notes: question wording and full issue list not publishedcombines gay and transgender issues into one item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Laws related to gay and transgender people
  • Inflation
  • Jobs and the economy
  • other issues not enumerated in the memo

Figures transcribed from public sources; each links to the original release. How to read this data →