Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the
address updates so any view can be shared.
Fox News Pollfor Fox NewsSportsMar 14–17, 2025ban on transgender women competing in women's sports
49.-53. Please tell me if you favor or oppose... [RANDOMIZE]
Banning transgender women from competing in women's sports?
Wording notes: framed as a ban
Response options as the pollster wrote them
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersSportsMar 12–13, 2025
whether trans women should be allowed to compete in women's sports
Should biological males who identify as women be allowed to compete in women's sports events?
Wording notes: 'biological males who identify as women' is the restrictive-side term of art and the only descriptor offeredno counter-framing or competing consideration offeredyes/no rather than a scaled item, which suppresses intensity
Response options as the pollster wrote them
NNNapolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersBathrooms & facilitiesMar 12–13, 2025
whether trans women should be allowed to use women's locker rooms, showers and bathrooms
Should biological males who identify as women be allowed to use the women's locker rooms, showers, and bathrooms?
Wording notes: 'biological males who identify as women' used throughoutbundles locker rooms, showers and bathrooms into a single item, leading with the most intimate settingno counter-framing offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Echelon InsightsSportsMar 10–13, 2025whether Democrats agree with Gavin Newsom that trans women in women's sports is 'deeply unfair'
[If QPartyID = 2. Democrat OR QPartyLeanView = 2. Democrats, ask]
On his podcast, California Governor Gavin Newsom said that biological men who identify as women competing in women's sports was "deeply unfair." Do you agree with Newsom's statement? [RANDOMIZE SCALE 1-4, 4-1]
Base: The Newsom item was asked only of self-identified Democrats and Democratic leaners (n=457)
Wording notes: quotes 'biological men who identify as women' in the pollster's own stem, sourced to Newsomattributes the position to a prominent Democrat, giving Democratic respondents an in-party cue to agreeasked only of Democrats and Democratic leaners'deeply unfair' is an emotive characterization carried into the stem as a quotation
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Unsure
The Trevor ProjectPolitical salienceparaphrasedMar 4, 2025 – Oct 15, 2025self-reported effects of recent LGBTQ+-related policies, laws and debates
When asked about how recent LGBTQ+-related policies, laws, and debates affected them
When asked about how recent LGBTQ+-related policies, laws, and debates affected them: 90% of LGBTQ+ young people said that it caused them stress or anxiety, including 94% of transgender and nonbinary young people. Nearly 8 in 10 LGBTQ+ young people (78%) said it made them feel unsafe, including 86% of transgender and nonbinary young people. Over 7 in 10 LGBTQ+ young people (76%) said it negatively impacted their mental health, including 83% of transgender and nonbinary young people. Nearly one-third (32%) of LGBTQ+ young people said it made them or their family consider moving to a different state, including 38% of transgender and nonbinary young people. Nearly a quarter (23%) of LGBTQ+ young people said it made them feel unsafe going to a doctor or hospital, including 29% of transgender and nonbinary young people.
Caused them stress or anxiety
90%
Made them feel unsafe
78%
Negatively impacted their mental health
76%
Made them or their family consider moving to a different state
32%
Made them feel unsafe going to a doctor or hospital
23%
- Sample
- 16,667 LGBTQ+ young people ages 13-24 - nonprobability social-media-recruited sample, NOT a poll of the general public · not applicable - nonprobability sample
- Method
- nonprobability quota
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 5 subgroup figures
Base: 43,995 individuals began the survey; 2,911 did not consent, 5,065 failed demographic screening, 17,646 failed a 5-minute validity check, 1,377 failed age verification and a 65%-completion validity check, and 329 were bots, duplicates or dishonest responders.
Wording notes: every offered response option describes a negative effect; no positive or null-effect option is reported
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Caused stress or anxiety
- Made them feel unsafe
- Negatively impacted their mental health
- Made them or their family consider moving to a different state
- Made them feel unsafe going to a doctor or hospital
The Trevor ProjectYouth medical careparaphrasedMar 4, 2025 – Oct 15, 2025hormone and puberty-blocker use, difficulty accessing care, and worry about losing access
Access to Care - Medical Care
Among transgender and nonbinary young people, 10% of those ages 13-17 and 44% of those ages 18-24 reported taking hormones to support their gender transition or expression. 3% reported taking puberty blockers. 87% of transgender and nonbinary young people who used hormones to support their gender transition or expression were somewhat or very concerned about losing access to this care. 75% of transgender and nonbinary young people who reported having access to this type of care also said they experienced some or many difficulties in accessing it: 60% reported insurance coverage issues, 57% reported long wait times for appointments, 52% reported a lack of knowledgeable healthcare providers in their area.
- Sample
- asked of a subset: TGNB young people currently taking hormones, TGNB young people reporting difficulties, TGNB young people unable to access desired hormones, TGNB young people using hormonesfull poll: 16,667 LGBTQ+ young people ages 13-24 - nonprobability social-media-recruited sample, NOT a poll of the general public · not applicable - nonprobability sample
- Method
- nonprobability quota
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 9 subgroup figures
Base: 43,995 individuals began the survey; 2,911 did not consent, 5,065 failed demographic screening, 17,646 failed a 5-minute validity check, 1,377 failed age verification and a 65%-completion validity check, and 329 were bots, duplicates or dishonest responders.
The Trevor ProjectPronouns & languageparaphrasedMar 4, 2025 – Oct 15, 2025exposure to harmful and to supportive language about LGBTQ+ identity in the past 12 months
When asked about language related to their LGBTQ+ identity in the past 12 months
When asked about language related to their LGBTQ+ identity in the past 12 months: More than 8 in 10 LGBTQ+ young people (83%) said they noticed harmful rhetoric around LGBTQ+ people, including 86% of transgender and nonbinary young people. More than 7 in 10 LGBTQ+ young people (72%) said they encountered derogatory terms or expressions about their identity, including 76% of transgender and nonbinary young people. Nearly 7 in 10 (69%) LGBTQ+ young people heard language that made them feel unsafe or unwelcome, including 74% of transgender and nonbinary young people. Conversely, nearly 8 in 10 LGBTQ+ young people (78%) also said they had heard supportive language about their identity, including 81% of transgender and nonbinary young people.
Noticed harmful rhetoric around LGBTQ+ people
83%
Heard supportive language about their identity
78%
Encountered derogatory terms or expressions about their identity
72%
Heard language that made them feel unsafe or unwelcome
69%
- Sample
- 16,667 LGBTQ+ young people ages 13-24 - nonprobability social-media-recruited sample, NOT a poll of the general public · not applicable - nonprobability sample
- Method
- nonprobability quota
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 4 subgroup figures
Base: 43,995 individuals began the survey; 2,911 did not consent, 5,065 failed demographic screening, 17,646 failed a 5-minute validity check, 1,377 failed age verification and a 65%-completion validity check, and 329 were bots, duplicates or dishonest responders.
Wording notes: battery includes a supportive-language counterweight item, unlike the policies battery
PPICSportsMar 2025 – Apr 4, 2025requiring trans athletes to compete by sex assigned at birth
To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies? [rotate questions 67 and 68]
Requiring that transgender athletes compete on teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with
Base: n=1,094 likely voters; n=279 public school parents
Wording notes: restrictive policy is the 'support' poleasked in rotation with an item on closing the US Department of Education, both framed as Trump executive-order policies in PPIC's narrative
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- strongly support
- somewhat support
- somewhat oppose
- strongly oppose
- don't know
PRRINondiscriminationMar 2025 – Mar 31, 2025LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIBathrooms & facilitiesMar 2025 – Mar 31, 2025laws requiring restroom use matching sex assigned at birth ('bathroom bills')
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that require transgender individuals to use bathrooms that correspond to their sex at birth rather than their current gender identity
Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.
Wording notes: uses 'sex at birth' against 'current gender identity'policy stated as a restriction the respondent favors or opposes
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Somewhat favor
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIGeneral acceptanceMar 2025 – Mar 31, 2025agreement that transgender people deserve equal rights and protections
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Transgender people deserve the same rights and protections as other Americans.
Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.
Wording notes: abstract equality principle with no policy contentagree/disagree format is exposed to acquiescence bias
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Completely agree
- Mostly agree
- Mostly disagree
- Completely disagree
- Skipped/Refused
YouGovfor The EconomistGeneral acceptanceMar 2025 – Mar 4, 2025whether society has gone too far in accepting transgender people
Which of the following statements comes closer to your feelings?
Base: 1,491 registered voters
Wording notes: three-option too far / about right / not far enough frame
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Our society has gone too far in accepting people who are transgender
- Our society has been about right when it comes to accepting people who are transgender
- Our society has not gone far enough in accepting people who are transgender
- Not sure
PRRIGeneral acceptanceFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025whether transgender people deserve the same rights and protections as other Americans
Agree/disagree stem not published on the report page.
transgender people deserve the same rights and protections as other Americans
Base: 20,771 respondents from Ipsos KnowledgePanel plus 1,340 from opt-in panels
Wording notes: abstract equality framing rather than a specific policyagree/disagree format subject to acquiescence biasconsistently produces much higher support than any concrete trans policy item in the same survey
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Agree (net)
- Disagree (net)
PRRIBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025laws requiring bathroom use matching sex at birth
Respondents rate each policy on a strongly favor / favor / oppose / strongly oppose scale.
Laws that require transgender individuals to use bathrooms that correspond to their sex at birth rather than their current gender identity
Base: 20,771 respondents from Ipsos KnowledgePanel plus 1,340 from opt-in panels
Wording notes: favor = restrictionsame trend item as the 2017-2023 AVA series
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
PRRINondiscriminationparaphrasedFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025employment, housing and public accommodation nondiscrimination laws
Do you favor or oppose laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing?
Base: 20,771 Ipsos KnowledgePanel + 1,340 opt-in panel recruits
Wording notes: names transgender people explicitly
Response options as the pollster wrote them
PRRINondiscriminationFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Base: Pooled annual AVA dataset: 20,771 Ipsos KnowledgePanel respondents plus 1,340 recruited by Ipsos from opt-in panels to reach a minimum of n=150 in smaller states. Aggregation of the 2025 monthly waves rather than a single fielding. The Q12d bathroom and Q11d equal-rights rows pool only the March and September 2025 waves. Unweighted party n: Republican 6,886, independent 6,334, Democrat 7,050. State sample sizes (unweighted): AL 267, AK 161, AZ 483, AR 167, CA 2,098, CO 330, CT 280, DE 167, DC 160, FL 1,385, GA 573, HI 156, ID 174, IL 704, IN 443, IA 231, KS 188, KY 315, LA 238, ME 170, MD 388, MA 383, MI 696, MN 555, MS 186, MO 351, MT 173, NE 171, NV 189, NH 165, NJ 528, NM 158, NY 1,071, NC 655, ND 158, OH 877, OK 211, OR 564, PA 1,037, RI 152, SC 320, SD 160, TN 402, TX 1,626, UT 213, VT 160, VA 581, WA 504, WV 174, WI 456, WY 157.
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIBathrooms & facilitiesFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025laws requiring restroom use matching sex assigned at birth ('bathroom bills')
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that require transgender individuals to use bathrooms that correspond to their sex at birth rather than their current gender identity
Base: Pooled annual AVA dataset: 20,771 Ipsos KnowledgePanel respondents plus 1,340 recruited by Ipsos from opt-in panels to reach a minimum of n=150 in smaller states. Aggregation of the 2025 monthly waves rather than a single fielding. The Q12d bathroom and Q11d equal-rights rows pool only the March and September 2025 waves. Unweighted party n: Republican 6,886, independent 6,334, Democrat 7,050. State sample sizes (unweighted): AL 267, AK 161, AZ 483, AR 167, CA 2,098, CO 330, CT 280, DE 167, DC 160, FL 1,385, GA 573, HI 156, ID 174, IL 704, IN 443, IA 231, KS 188, KY 315, LA 238, ME 170, MD 388, MA 383, MI 696, MN 555, MS 186, MO 351, MT 173, NE 171, NV 189, NH 165, NJ 528, NM 158, NY 1,071, NC 655, ND 158, OH 877, OK 211, OR 564, PA 1,037, RI 152, SC 320, SD 160, TN 402, TX 1,626, UT 213, VT 160, VA 581, WA 504, WV 174, WI 456, WY 157.
Wording notes: uses 'sex at birth' against 'current gender identity'policy stated as a restriction the respondent favors or opposes
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Somewhat favor
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIGeneral acceptanceFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025agreement that transgender people deserve equal rights and protections
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Transgender people deserve the same rights and protections as other Americans.
Base: Pooled annual AVA dataset: 20,771 Ipsos KnowledgePanel respondents plus 1,340 recruited by Ipsos from opt-in panels to reach a minimum of n=150 in smaller states. Aggregation of the 2025 monthly waves rather than a single fielding. The Q12d bathroom and Q11d equal-rights rows pool only the March and September 2025 waves. Unweighted party n: Republican 6,886, independent 6,334, Democrat 7,050. State sample sizes (unweighted): AL 267, AK 161, AZ 483, AR 167, CA 2,098, CO 330, CT 280, DE 167, DC 160, FL 1,385, GA 573, HI 156, ID 174, IL 704, IN 443, IA 231, KS 188, KY 315, LA 238, ME 170, MD 388, MA 383, MI 696, MN 555, MS 186, MO 351, MT 173, NE 171, NV 189, NH 165, NJ 528, NM 158, NY 1,071, NC 655, ND 158, OH 877, OK 211, OR 564, PA 1,037, RI 152, SC 320, SD 160, TN 402, TX 1,626, UT 213, VT 160, VA 581, WA 504, WV 174, WI 456, WY 157.
Wording notes: abstract equality principle with no policy contentagree/disagree format is exposed to acquiescence bias
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Completely agree
- Mostly agree
- Mostly disagree
- Completely disagree
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIBathrooms & facilitiesFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025laws requiring bathroom use by sex at birth
Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that require transgender individuals to use bathrooms that correspond to their sex at birth rather than their current gender identity
Wording notes: restrictive policy is the 'favor' poleuses 'sex at birth' vs 'current gender identity'battery item with no standalone stem - the favor/oppose scale is supplied once for the whole grid
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Somewhat favor
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRINondiscriminationFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025LGBT nondiscrimination protections
Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Wording notes: names all four groups explicitlylists three specific domains (jobs, public accommodations, housing)battery item with no standalone stem
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PRRIGeneral acceptanceFeb 28, 2025 – Dec 8, 2025trans people deserve equal rights and protections
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Transgender people deserve the same rights and protections as other Americans.
Wording notes: affirming direction is the 'agree' pole
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Completely agree
- Mostly agree
- Mostly disagree
- Completely disagree
- Skipped/Refused
Winthrop PollGeneral acceptanceFeb 21, 2025 – Mar 5, 2025perceived discrimination against gay, lesbian and transgender people
In our society today, how much discrimination is there against
In our society today, how much discrimination is there against Gays, Lesbians, and Transgender people?
Base: 1,220 weighted respondents, South Carolina adult residents
Wording notes: bundles gay, lesbian and transgender people into a single group - transgender-specific attitudes cannot be separated outasked as one row in a multi-group discrimination battery
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- A lot
- Some
- Only a little
- None at all
Harvard CAPS/HarrisLegal documents & IDsFeb 19–20, 2025executive order declaring two sexes in federal programs
Do you support or oppose each of these policies: Declaring that there are only two genders male and female in all government forms and programs
Base: Unweighted and weighted base 2,443.
Wording notes: item is one of eleven Trump executive actions rated in a single batteryno 'not sure' option'genders' rather than 'sex', though the underlying executive order uses 'sex'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Harvard CAPS/HarrisSportsFeb 19–20, 2025executive order barring trans women from girls' sports
Do you support or oppose each of these policies: Banning men who have undergone operations and hormones to become women from girls sports
Base: Unweighted and weighted base 2,443.
Wording notes: describes trans women as 'men who have undergone operations and hormones to become women''girls sports' onlyassumes the athletes in question have had operations and hormones, which is not true of most school-age athletesno 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
CNNPolitical salienceFeb 13–17, 2025unprompted naming of Trump's transgender/LGBT policies as his most significant second-term action
Regardless of whether you approve or disapprove of Donald Trump, what do you think is the single most significant action he has taken in his second term so far?
Wording notes: fully open-ended - trans policy is respondent-generated, not promptedfielded roughly three weeks after the January 2025 executive orders on gender
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Open-ended, coded into categories including 'Policies toward transgender Americans/LGBT issues'
Ipsosfor ReutersSportsFeb 13–18, 2025transgender girls in women's sports
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Transgender girls should be allowed to participate in women's sports
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: wording is essentially identical to the 2022 and 2023 TM2062Y21_2 fieldings, but the sample frame changed from opt-in to KnowledgePanel - the trend is not mode-cleancategory mismatch: 'transgender girls' (minors) into 'women's sports' (adult category)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Don't know
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersSportsFeb 13–18, 2025transgender boys in men's sports
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Transgender boys should be allowed to participate in men's sports
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: mirror item isolating direction of transition while holding everything else constant
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Don't know
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersSportsFeb 13–18, 2025transgender women in elite women's leagues
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Transgender women should be allowed to complete in elite women's sports leagues (WNBA, NCAA, NWSL, Olympics, etc.).
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: names four specific elite leagues, which anchors the respondent on the highest-stakes competitive contexttypographical error in the fielded stem ('complete' for 'compete')
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Don't know
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersSportsFeb 13–18, 2025transgender athletes in elementary and high school sports
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Transgender athletes should be able to participate in children's sports (elementary/high school)
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: same wording as the July 2023 item TM3158BY23_3, but fielded on KnowledgePanel rather than the opt-in sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Don't know
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersParty & candidate handlingFeb 13–18, 2025support for the executive order banning trans girls and women from female school and college sports
To what extent do your support or oppose the following policies?
To what extent do your support or oppose the following policies? Banning transgender girls and women from participating in female sports events in schools and colleges
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: NO 'don't know' or 'not sure' option in this battery - unlike the agree/disagree sports items in the same questionnaire, which offered one and saw 14-16% take itrestrictive polarity: 'support' means supporting the banpresented as an existing federal policy in the ExecOrder battery, which invokes partisan cue-takingtypographical error in the fielded stem
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersPrisons & sheltersFeb 13–18, 2025housing transgender women prisoners in men's prisons
To what extent do your support or oppose the following policies?
To what extent do your support or oppose the following policies? Requiring that transgender women prisoners serve their time in men's prisons
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: no 'don't know' offeredrestrictive polaritydoes not mention the documented safety consequences for trans women housed in men's facilities, which is the central contested fact
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersPolitical salienceFeb 13–18, 2025vote motivation from the trans sports ban policy
Below is a list of proposed or current policies of the federal government. Regardless of whether you support or oppose the policy, how much do each of the following policies you motivate you to vote in the next election?
Below is a list of proposed or current policies of the federal government. Regardless of whether you support or oppose the policy, how much do each of the following policies you motivate you to vote in the next election? Banning transgender girls and women from participating in female sports events in schools and colleges
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: the fielded stem is grammatically broken, which raises a genuine comprehension question about what respondents were answeringexplicitly direction-neutral ('regardless of whether you support or oppose'), which is a design strength'Don't know' offered here, unlike the paired support/oppose battery
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Very motivating
- Motivating
- Somewhat motivating
- Not at all motivating
- Don't know
- Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersMilitary serviceFeb 13–18, 2025banning transgender people from military service
Do you support or oppose each of the following? (Items a-d asked of one half sample, e-h asked of other half sample)
Do you support or oppose each of the following? Banning transgender people from serving in the military
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: the summary table publishes only a two-way Support/Oppose split plus 'No opinion/Skipped'; no strength-of-opinion breakdown is printed for this itemrestrictive polaritynarrower than the Reuters/Ipsos version, which covered both 'enlisting and serving openly' - this asks only about servinghalf-sample base
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Support
- Oppose
- No opinion/Skipped
Ipsosfor ReutersParty & candidate handlingFeb 13–18, 2025best thing Trump has done, open-ended - share naming DEI/LGBT/transgender policy
(IF SUPPORT TRUMP) What do you think is the best thing Trump has done since entering office in January? (Open-end; responses grouped into categories)
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: asked only of respondents who said they support what Trump has done, so the base is supporters rather than all adultsthe coding scheme merges DEI rollback, 'LGBT inclusions' and transgender policy into a single bucket, so the trans-specific share cannot be isolated
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Open-ended; coded into categories including 'Ending DEI/LGBT inclusions/Transgender policies'
Ipsosfor ReutersParty & candidate handlingFeb 13–18, 2025worst thing Trump has done, open-ended - share naming DEI/LGBT/transgender policy
(IF OPPOSE TRUMP) What do you think is the worst thing Trump has done since entering office in January? (Open-end; responses grouped into categories)
Base: The 'About the Study' page states 4,125 U.S. residents age 18+, while the topline tables report N=4,145 for full-sample items (1,300 Democrats, 1,309 Republicans, 1,165 Independents). Both figures are recorded as published; the discrepancy is in the source document, not introduced here. Two items (TM3212Y24_13 and _14) were split-sampled at roughly N=2,070 each.
Wording notes: asked only of respondents who oppose what Trump has donesame merged DEI/LGBT/transgender coding category as Q9, so trans-specific mentions cannot be separated19% skipped the question
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Open-ended; coded into categories including 'Ending DEI/LGBT inclusions/Transgender policies'
QUQuinnipiac UniversityLegal documents & IDsFeb 13–17, 2025
January 2025 executive order defining sex as two immutable sexes; federal recognition of only male and female
Do you support or oppose President Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes, male and female, in the United States?
Base: self-identified registered voters nationwide
Wording notes: names Trump as the author of the policydescribes the order only as 'recognizing only two sexes' without stating its effects on IDs or federal programsno middle option offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Echelon InsightsPolitical salienceFeb 10–13, 2025what voters associate with the Trump campaign's 'Kamala is for they/them' ad
During the election, the Trump campaign released an ad with the tagline, "Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you." Which of these, if any, comes to your mind when you see this tagline? Choose all that apply. [RANDOMIZE 1-5] [SELECT MULTIPLE]
Kamala Harris is for transgender people
46%
Kamala Harris is for illegal immigrants
28%
Kamala Harris is not for everyday working Americans
26%
I didn't think of any of these
24%
Kamala Harris is for aid to foreign countries
18%
Kamala Harris is for people breaking the law
15%
Something else, please specify
4%
Unsure
5%
- Sample
- 1,010 likely voters · +/- 3.6 percentage points
- Method
- online opt-in
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: re-exposes respondents to an anti-trans campaign ad taglineresponse list mixes the trans reading with four non-trans readings
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Kamala Harris is for transgender people
- Kamala Harris is for illegal immigrants
- Kamala Harris is not for everyday working Americans
- Kamala Harris is for aid to foreign countries
- Kamala Harris is for people breaking the law
- Something else, please specify
- I didn't think of any of these
- Unsure
Pew Research CenterBathrooms & facilitiesFeb 10–17, 2025Form 1 arm of the randomized bathroom-item wording experiment
Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.
Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues. Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? Require transgender individuals to use public bathrooms that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with
Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.
Wording notes: asked of a random half sample (Form 1) onlyalternate arm wording withheld by the pollsteritems randomized within batteryresponse options rotated 1-5/5-1
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Neither favor nor oppose
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- No answer
Pew Research CenterIdentity beliefsFeb 10–17, 2025whether gender is determined by sex assigned at birth
Which statement comes closer to your views, even if neither is exactly right?
Whether someone is a man or a woman is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth
67%
Someone can be a man or a woman even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth
31%
No answer
2%
- Sample
- 5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
- Method
- probability panel
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.
Wording notes: response options randomizedno middle option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Whether someone is a man or a woman is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth
- Someone can be a man or a woman even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth
- No answer
Pew Research CenterNondiscriminationFeb 10–17, 2025protecting transgender people from discrimination in jobs, housing and public spaces
Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.
Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? ... Protect transgender individuals from discrimination in jobs, housing, and public spaces such as restaurants and stores
Strongly favor
31%
Strongly oppose
10%
Neither favor nor oppose
27%
No answer
1%
NET Strongly favor/Favor 56%Favor 25%NET Oppose/Strongly oppose 16%Oppose 6%
- Sample
- 5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
- Method
- probability panel
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.
Wording notes: items randomizedresponse options rotated 1-5/5-1asked of all respondents
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Neither favor nor oppose
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- No answer