Explore the polling

Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the address updates so any view can be shared.

Clear

1,931 questions from 644 polls

Pew Research CenterBathrooms & facilitiesFeb 10–17, 2025
requiring bathroom use matching sex assigned at birth

Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? ... Require transgender individuals to use public bathrooms that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with

Favor 36%26% Oppose
NET Strongly favor/Favor 49%Favor 12%Oppose 12%
Sample
5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.

Wording notes: Form 1 only (n=2,565)a slightly different, unpublished wording was tested on the other half for experimental purposes
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Neither favor nor oppose
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • No answer
Pew Research CenterSchool policyFeb 10–17, 2025
banning elementary school instruction about gender identity

Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? ... Make it illegal for public school districts to teach about gender identity in elementary schools

Favor 35%34% Oppose
NET Strongly favor/Favor 47%Oppose 14%Favor 12%
Sample
5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.

Wording notes: items randomizedasked of all respondents
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Neither favor nor oppose
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • No answer
Pew Research CenterSportsFeb 10–17, 2025
requiring trans athletes to compete on teams matching sex assigned at birth

Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? ... Require that transgender athletes compete on teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with

Favor 49%19% Oppose
NET Strongly favor/Favor 66%Favor 17%NET Oppose/Strongly oppose 15%Oppose 7%
Sample
5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 2 subgroup figures

Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.

Wording notes: Form 1 only (n=2,565)a slightly different, unpublished wording was tested on the other half for experimental purposesdoes not specify level of competition or sex of athlete
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Neither favor nor oppose
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • No answer
Pew Research CenterAdult medical careFeb 10–17, 2025
requiring health insurance coverage of gender transition care

Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? ... Require health insurance companies to cover medical care for gender transitions

Favor 10%53% Oppose
NET Strongly favor/Favor 22%Oppose 17%Favor 12%
Sample
5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.

Wording notes: items randomizedmandate framingasked of all respondents
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Neither favor nor oppose
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • No answer
Pew Research CenterYouth medical careFeb 10–17, 2025
banning gender transition medical care for people under 18

Here are some current laws and policies that are either in place or being considered in the U.S. related to transgender issues.

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that do each of the following? ... Make it illegal for health care professionals to provide someone younger than 18 with medical care for a gender transition

Favor 42%12% Oppose
NET Strongly favor/Favor 56%Favor 14%
Sample
5,097 adults · +/- 1.6 percentage points for the full sample of 5,097; Pew does not publish a separate margin of error for the n=2,565 Form 1 half sample
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 2 subgroup figures

Base: Items b (bathrooms) and d (athletes) were asked only of Form 1, n=2,565. Form 2 received a different wording of both items that Pew has never published. The questionnaire codebook shows X_FORM (1=Form 1, 2=Form 2) with the note 'Flag to randomly assign panelists to one of two forms (Form 1, Form 2) and weight within form.' Separately, a subset of W163 respondents (n=284) had been asked TRANSGEND6 in January 2025 as part of W160; their answers were combined into the reported totals for the ASK ALL items.

Wording notes: items randomizedasked of all respondentsdoes not distinguish blockers/hormones/surgery
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Neither favor nor oppose
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • No answer
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersSchool policyFeb 5–6, 2025
Trump executive order defunding schools that teach children they can choose their own genders

President Trump has issued an executive order removing funding from any school that teaches children that they can choose their own genders. Do you favor or oppose this executive order?

Favor 59%37% Oppose
Favor (total) 59%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: 'teaches children that they can choose their own genders' adopts the order's own characterization of what schools dothe sanction (removing all funding from the school) is stated without any counterweightTrump named as the actor
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Somewhat favor
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Not sure
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersSchool policyFeb 5–6, 2025
firing school administrators who defy the executive order

Some school administrators have indicated that they plan to defy President Trump's executive order. Should a school administrator who defies the order and teaches that children can choose their own genders be fired?

Yes
52%
No
37%
Not sure
11%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: 'defy' frames the administrator as a lawbreaker before the sanction is asked aboutasked immediately after the favor/oppose item on the same order, so the prior answer anchors this oneno option short of firing is offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
RedBridge Groupfor Equality AustraliaPolitical salienceparaphrasedFeb 3–7, 2025
whether politicians should politicise trans issues for political gain

Government and opposition should not politicise trans issues for political gain.

Agree or strongly agree
86%
Sample
1,013 adults
Method
unknown
Where
Australia national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Australians aged 18 and older

Wording notes: 'politicise ... for political gain' is a pejorative framing of the behaviour being asked about
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly disagree
RedBridge Groupfor Equality AustraliaGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedFeb 3–7, 2025
LGBT people living with dignity and respect

LGBT people deserve to live with dignity and respect.

Agree or strongly agree
89%
Sample
1,013 adults
Method
unknown
Where
Australia national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Australians aged 18 and older

Wording notes: valence statement with near-universal social desirability
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly disagree
RedBridge Groupfor Equality AustraliaGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedFeb 3–7, 2025
freedom of trans people to live as they choose

Trans people should have the freedom and choice to live their lives in the way that makes them happy.

Agree or strongly agree
91%
Sample
1,013 adults
Method
unknown
Where
Australia national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Australians aged 18 and older

Wording notes: abstract freedom framing with no concrete policy content
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly disagree
RedBridge Groupfor Equality AustraliaNondiscriminationparaphrasedFeb 3–7, 2025
equal rights and protections for trans people

Trans people deserve the same rights and protections as other Australians.

Agree or strongly agree
81%
Sample
1,013 adults
Method
unknown
Where
Australia national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Australians aged 18 and older

Wording notes: equal-treatment framing
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly disagree
YouGovfor The EconomistBathrooms & facilitiesFeb 2–4, 2025
requiring bathroom use by sex assigned at birth

Support for Policies -- Requiring transgender people to use bathrooms that match their sex assigned at birth, rather than their gender identity

Would you support or oppose the following?

Support 54%30% Oppose
Sample
1,604 adult citizens · ±3.2% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 15 subgroup figures

Base: 1,423 registered voters

Wording notes: restrictive direction is the support sidefielded during the first weeks of the second Trump administration, in a battery of that administration's actions
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Somewhat support
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Not sure
Ipsosfor ReutersMilitary serviceJan 31, 2025 – Feb 2, 2025
support for barring transgender people from military service

To what extent do your support or oppose the following policies?

To what extent do your support or oppose the following policies? Barring transgender people from enlisting and serving openly in the military

Support 40%55% Oppose
Sample
1,032 adults · not disclosed
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 18 subgroup figures

Base: Party breaks are published for Republican, Democrat and Independent columns; the topline does not print the party base sizes.

Wording notes: no 'don't know' offered; only 'Skipped' (4%)restrictive polarity - 'support' means supporting the ban'enlisting and serving openly' is double-barreled in principle, covering both entry and continued service, though the executive order itself covered bothembedded in a ten-item battery of Trump executive orders, which activates partisan cue-taking
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Somewhat support
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Skipped
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research (Global Strategy Group and GBAO)Political salienceJan 30, 2025 – Feb 3, 2025
whether transgender issues should be a priority for the President and Congress

Which do you feel are most important for the President and Congress to focus on?

Inflation and the cost of living (top five most important)
59%
Immigration and the border (top five most important)
36%
Transgender issues (top five most important)
5%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 73 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 100 additional independent voters.

Wording notes: respondents pick a top five from a 21-item list; 'Transgender issues' competes against economic itemslabel 'Transgender issues' is undefined
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Inflation and the cost of living
  • Jobs and the economy
  • Immigration and the border
  • Health care
  • Social Security and Medicare
  • Corruption in government
  • Taxes
  • Housing
  • Crime
  • Government debt, deficits, and spending
  • Climate change and the environment
  • National security and foreign policy
  • Democracy
  • Abortion
  • Guns
  • Education
  • The conflict in Israel, Gaza, and the Middle East
  • Censorship of free speech
  • Vaccines and disease prevention
  • The conflict in Ukraine and Russia
  • Transgender issues
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research (Global Strategy Group and GBAO)Political salienceJan 30, 2025 – Feb 3, 2025
whether Trump and congressional Republicans are focused on transgender issues

Which do you think Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are most focused on?

Immigration and the border (top five most focused on)
73%
Inflation and the cost of living (top five most focused on)
29%
Transgender issues (top five most focused on)
27%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 73 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 100 additional independent voters.

Wording notes: parallel construction with the priority item, enabling a priority-versus-focus gap
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Inflation and the cost of living
  • Jobs and the economy
  • Immigration and the border
  • Health care
  • Social Security and Medicare
  • Corruption in government
  • Taxes
  • Housing
  • Crime
  • Government debt, deficits, and spending
  • Climate change and the environment
  • National security and foreign policy
  • Democracy
  • Abortion
  • Guns
  • Education
  • The conflict in Israel, Gaza, and the Middle East
  • Censorship of free speech
  • Vaccines and disease prevention
  • The conflict in Ukraine and Russia
  • Transgender issues
Rasmussen ReportsMilitary serviceJan 29, 2025 – Feb 2, 2025
Trump executive order discharging trans service members

President Trump recently signed an executive order to discharge military service members who identify as transgender or are receiving transgender treatments for failing to meet physical and mental fitness requirements. Do you approve or disapprove of this policy?

Approve 54%41% Disapprove
Sample
1,325 likely voters · +/- 3 percentage points
Method
IVR
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: the stem adopts the executive order's own rationale ('for failing to meet physical and mental fitness requirements') as a statement of fact rather than a claimasked third, after two items establishing that the military has a recruiting and readiness problem'who identify as transgender'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly approve
  • Somewhat approve
  • Somewhat disapprove
  • Strongly disapprove
  • Not sure
Marquette Law School PollLegal documents & IDsJan 27, 2025 – Feb 5, 2025
Trump executive order defining sex as male/female only and requiring federal documents including passports to reflect birth sex

Asked within a battery of favor/oppose items on early Trump administration executive actions.

Do you favor or oppose President Trump's executive order requiring federal agencies to recognize biological sex as male or female only, eliminate references to gender identity in policies, and require federal documents, such as passports, to reflect biological sex, not gender identity?

Favor 63%37% Oppose
Sample
1,018 adults · +/- 3.5 percentage points
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures
Wording notes: bundles three distinct policy components into one item (binary sex recognition, removal of gender identity references from policy, document/passport markers)attributes the policy to President Trump by name, inviting partisan cue-takingadopts the administration's own term 'biological sex'reported two-way with undecideds excluded
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
McLaughlin & AssociatesSportsJan 22–27, 2025
federal law barring trans women and girls from women's and girls' sports

Do you support or oppose Congress passing a federal law that prevents biological males from competing in women's and girls' sports?

Support 67%23% Oppose
Sample
1,000 general election voters · not disclosed
Method
unknown
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 40 subgroup figures
Wording notes: 'biological males' is the only descriptor offered'prevents ... from competing' frames a ban as prevention, which is easier to endorse than 'ban'no age, sport or level of competition specifiedfielded in the week of the second Trump inauguration, when the executive order on this subject was imminent
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Somewhat support
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • DK/Refused
GallupMilitary serviceJan 21–27, 2025
allowing openly transgender people to serve in the military

Do you favor or oppose allowing openly transgender men and women to serve in the military?

Favor 116%35% Oppose
Sample
1,001 adults · ±4 percentage points
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Gallup's own trend table footnotes the 2025 reading of this item '^ Asked of a half sample'. The 2019 and 2021 readings in the same trend carry no such footnote, so the 2025 drop from 66% to 58% favor is measured on a different (smaller) base than the readings it is compared with. Gallup does not publish the half-sample n or margin of error.

Wording notes: uses 'openly transgender men and women'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersLegal documents & IDsJan 21–22, 2025
Trump executive order requiring federal agencies to recognize only two sexes

President Trump signed an executive order requiring government agencies to recognize that there are only two sexes, male and female. Do you favor or oppose this policy?

Favor 62%31% Oppose
Favor (total) 62%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record
Wording notes: attributes the policy to Trump by name, which turns the item partly into a partisan cuedescribes the order only by its own self-description and never states its practical effect on passports, IDs or federal records
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Somewhat favor
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Not sure
Harvard CAPS/HarrisAdult medical careJan 15–16, 2025
ending public funding of gender surgery for prisoners and detainees

Do you support or oppose each of the following polices? Ending government payments for sex change operations for prisoners and those in immigration detention

Support 64%20% Oppose
Sample
2,650 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted and weighted base 2,650.

Wording notes: 'sex change operations' is not a clinical termbundles prisoners and immigration detaineestypo 'polices'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly Support
  • Somewhat Support
  • Somewhat Oppose
  • Strongly Oppose
  • Unsure/ Don't Know
AP-NORCSchool policyJan 9–13, 2025
eliminating Title IX protections for transgender students

[GRID ITEMS RANDOMIZED, HALF SAMPLE ASKED RESPONSE OPTIONS IN REVERSE ORDER]

Would you favor, neither favor nor oppose, or oppose each of the following government policies? Eliminating protections for transgender students under Title IX, the federal law that prohibits any high school or college that receives federal funds from discriminating on the basis of gender

Strongly favor
17%
Somewhat favor
12%
Neither favor nor oppose
25%
Skipped/refused
1%
Strongly/somewhat oppose (NET) 45%Strongly/somewhat favor (NET) 29%
Sample
1,147 adults · not read from the topline in this session
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: stem explains what Title IX does, which supplies a pro-protection framerestrictive-direction stem: 'favor' is the restrictive answerasked in a battery of eight incoming-Trump-administration policies
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Somewhat favor
  • Neither favor nor oppose
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • DK
  • SKP/REF
College Pulsefor FIREPolitical salienceJan 3, 2025 – Jun 5, 2025
transgender rights named as a topic that is difficult to discuss openly on campus

Some students say it can be difficult to have conversations about certain issues on campus. Which of the following issues, if any, would you say are difficult to have an open and honest conversation about on your campus? (select all that apply)

Transgender rights is difficult to discuss openly on my campus
41%
Sample
68,510 undergraduates enrolled in four-year degree programs
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national (257 colleges and universities)
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: students at 257 colleges and universities

Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Abortion
  • Gun control
  • Racial inequality
  • Transgender rights
  • other issues (select all that apply)
College Pulsefor FIREGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedJan 3, 2025 – Jun 5, 2025
allowing a campus speaker who says transgender people have a mental disorder

If a controversial speaker were invited to campus, should your school allow this speaker on campus? - A speaker who says "Transgender people have a mental disorder."

Definitely should not allow
41%
Probably should not allow
33%
Sample
68,510 undergraduates enrolled in four-year degree programs
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national (257 colleges and universities)
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: students at 257 colleges and universities

Wording notes: speaker statement is itself a stigmatizing claim about trans people
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Definitely should allow
  • Probably should allow
  • Probably should not allow
  • Definitely should not allow
College Pulsefor FIREYouth medical careparaphrasedJan 3, 2025 – Jun 5, 2025
allowing a campus speaker who says children should be able to transition without parental consent

If a controversial speaker were invited to campus, should your school allow this speaker on campus? - A speaker who says "Children should be able to transition without parental consent."

Probably should not allow
33%
Definitely should not allow
18%
Sample
68,510 undergraduates enrolled in four-year degree programs
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national (257 colleges and universities)
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: students at 257 colleges and universities

Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Definitely should allow
  • Probably should allow
  • Probably should not allow
  • Definitely should not allow
GallupGeneral acceptanceJan 2–15, 2025
satisfaction with the acceptance of transgender people in the nation (Mood of the Nation state-of-the-nation battery, asked of a random half sample)

Next, we'd like to know how you feel about the state of the nation in each of the following areas. For each one, please say whether you are -- very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. If you don't have enough information about a particular subject to rate it, just say so.

Next, we'd like to know how you feel about the state of the nation in each of the following areas. For each one, please say whether you are -- very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. If you don't have enough information about a particular subject to rate it, just say so. How about -- the acceptance of transgender people in the nation?

Somewhat satisfied
28%
Somewhat satisfied
28%
Very dissatisfied
27%
Very dissatisfied
27%
Somewhat dissatisfied
23%
Somewhat dissatisfied
23%
Very satisfied
10%
Very satisfied
10%
No opinion
11%
Don't know
9%
Sample
1,005 adults · +/- 4 percentage points for the full sample of 1,005; the transgender item rests on the Form B half sample of 505, for which Gallup publishes no separate margin of error
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 95 subgroup figures

Base: The item was asked of Form B only. Gallup's January 2025 final topline gives the base as 'BASED ON ~505~ NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM B' out of a full sample of 1,005. Gallup publishes no separate half-sample margin of error.

Wording notes: asked of a random half sample of the January Mood of the Nation samplesatisfaction framing collapses two opposite reasons for dissatisfaction (wanting more acceptance and wanting less) into a single 'dissatisfied' response, which Gallup itself disentangles only with the 2026 follow-upexplicit don't-know escape offered in the stem
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Very satisfied
  • Somewhat satisfied
  • Somewhat dissatisfied
  • Very dissatisfied
  • No opinion
Ipsosfor The New York TimesGeneral acceptanceJan 2–10, 2025
society gone too far / not far enough in accommodating transgender people

Which statement comes closest to your feelings about the way our society deals with transgender people - that is, someone who does not identify with their sex at birth, like a person born male who now identifies as female.

Society has gone too far in accommodating transgender people
49%
Society has reached a reasonable balance when it comes to accommodating transgender people
28%
Society has not gone far enough in accommodating transgender people
21%
Refused
3%
Sample
2,128 adults · +/- 2.6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level for all respondents
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 12 subgroup figures

Base: Party subgroups as published: Republican/Lean Republican N=1,022; Democrat/Lean Democrat N=1,025; Independent/Something else N=81 (very small independent base - treat that column with caution)

Wording notes: supplies a definition of 'transgender' inside the question stemdefinition example is male-to-female onlyoffers an explicit middle option ('reasonable balance')
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Society has gone too far in accommodating transgender people.
  • Society has not gone far enough in accommodating transgender people.
  • Society has reached a reasonable balance when it comes to accommodating transgender people.
  • Refused
Ipsosfor The New York TimesSportsJan 2–10, 2025
transgender women competing in women's sports

Thinking about transgender female athletes - meaning athletes who were male at birth but who currently identify as female - do you think they should or should not be allowed to compete in women's sports?

Should be allowed 18%79% Should not be allowed
Sample
2,128 adults · +/- 2.6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level for all respondents
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 12 subgroup figures

Base: Party subgroups as published: Republican/Lean Republican N=1,022; Democrat/Lean Democrat N=1,025; Independent/Something else N=81 (very small independent base - treat that column with caution)

Wording notes: no level of competition specified (youth vs. college vs. elite)no middle or 'depends' option offered'who were male at birth' framing
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Should be allowed to compete in women's sports
  • Should not be allowed to compete in women's sports
  • Refused
Ipsosfor The New York TimesYouth medical careJan 2–10, 2025
puberty blockers / hormone therapy for minors, by age band

Thinking about medications used for transgender care, do you think doctors should be able to prescribe puberty-blocking drugs or hormone therapy to minors between the ages of 10 and 18?

No one under age 18 should have access
71%
Yes, but only minors ages 15 to 18 should have access
16%
Yes, minors ages 10 to 18 should have access
10%
Refused
4%
Sample
2,128 adults · +/- 2.6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level for all respondents
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 12 subgroup figures

Base: Party subgroups as published: Republican/Lean Republican N=1,022; Democrat/Lean Democrat N=1,025; Independent/Something else N=81 (very small independent base - treat that column with caution)

Wording notes: response set splits the permissive side into two options while the restrictive side is a single optiondoes not mention parental consent or clinical assessment
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes, minors ages 10 to 18 should have access
  • Yes, but only minors ages 15 to 18 should have access
  • No one under age 18 should have access
  • Refused
University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs Survey Research Centerfor The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedJan 2–10, 2025
perceived level of discrimination against transgender people in Georgia

[not published] how much discrimination transgender people face - a great deal, a fair amount, some, or none

A great deal or a fair amount
65%
Some
21%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · plus or minus 3.1 points at the 95% confidence level
Method
probability RDD
Where
US: Georgia
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Georgia registered voters; sample drawn from active registrant records.

Wording notes: wording not verified
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A great deal
  • A fair amount
  • Some
  • None
University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs Survey Research Centerfor The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionSportsparaphrasedJan 2–10, 2025
requiring student athletes to play by the sex on their birth certificate

[not published] whether student athletes should be required to play sports according to the sex on their birth certificate

Favor (net) - reported as 'more than 70%'
70%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · plus or minus 3.1 points at the 95% confidence level
Method
probability RDD
Where
US: Georgia
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Georgia registered voters; sample drawn from active registrant records.

Wording notes: wording not verified
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Somewhat favor
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs Survey Research Centerfor The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedJan 2–10, 2025
limiting bathroom use to the gender on the birth certificate

[not published] whether transgender people should be limited to using the bathroom that corresponds to the gender on their birth certificate

Strongly agree - reported as 'nearly 47%'
47%
Agree (net) - reported as 'more than 54%' 54%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · plus or minus 3.1 points at the 95% confidence level
Method
probability RDD
Where
US: Georgia
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Georgia registered voters; sample drawn from active registrant records.

Wording notes: wording not verifiedagree/disagree format subject to acquiescence bias
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs Survey Research Centerfor The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionGeneral acceptanceJan 2–10, 2025
perceived level of discrimination against transgender people

How much discrimination do you think there is against transgender people in our society today?

A great deal
40%
A fair amount
24.8%
Some
21%
None at all
9.5%
Don't know
4.7%
A great deal or a fair amount (NET) 64.8%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · plus or minus 3.1 points at the 95% confidence level
Method
probability RDD
Where
US: Georgia
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 115 subgroup figures

Base: Georgia registered voters; sample drawn from active registrant records.

Wording notes: asked immediately before the two restrictive-policy items, so it may prime a discrimination frame
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A great deal
  • A fair amount
  • Some
  • None at all
  • Don't know
University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs Survey Research Centerfor The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionBathrooms & facilitiesJan 2–10, 2025
laws requiring bathroom use matching the sex on the original birth certificate

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that require transgender individuals to use public bathrooms that match the sex on their original birth certificate, not the gender they identify with?

Favor 54%36% Oppose
Favor (NET) 54.2%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · plus or minus 3.1 points at the 95% confidence level
Method
probability RDD
Where
US: Georgia
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 115 subgroup figures

Base: Georgia registered voters; sample drawn from active registrant records.

Wording notes: uses 'original birth certificate'states the alternative inside the item ('not the gender they identify with')
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Somewhat favor
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Don't know
University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs Survey Research Centerfor The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionSportsJan 2–10, 2025
laws requiring athletes to compete on teams matching the sex on the original birth certificate

Would you favor or oppose laws or policies that require transgender athletes to compete on sports teams that match the sex on their original birth certificate, not the gender they identify with?

Favor 70%24% Oppose
Favor (NET) 70.1%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · plus or minus 3.1 points at the 95% confidence level
Method
probability RDD
Where
US: Georgia
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 115 subgroup figures

Base: Georgia registered voters; sample drawn from active registrant records.

Wording notes: uses 'original birth certificate'exactly parallel in construction to the bathroom item, which makes the 16-point gap between them a clean within-survey comparison
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Somewhat favor
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Don't know
GLAADfor GLAADContact & populationparaphrasedJan 2025 – Jan 31, 2025
personally knowing someone transgender or nonbinary

Non-LGBTQ adults say they don't personally know many members of the LGBTQ community (numbers will not add to 100% because people can select multiple options)

personally know someone who is transgender

Personally know someone who is gay or lesbian
63%
Personally know someone who is bisexual
34%
Personally know someone who is transgender
22%
Personally know someone who is nonbinary
11%
Sample
2,514 adults · not applicable - not a probability sample
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: items reported on non-LGBTQ and LGBTQ bases; subsample sizes not published

Wording notes: multiple-response battery; percentages do not sum to 100
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Gay or lesbian
  • Bisexual
  • Transgender
  • Queer
  • Pansexual
  • Nonbinary
  • Asexual
GLAADfor GLAADGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedJan 2025 – Jan 31, 2025
would support a close family member or friend who came out as trans or nonbinary

if someone close to them (like a family member or close friend) told them they were trans or nonbinary, they would support them

Would support someone close to them who is trans or nonbinary
73%
Sample
2,514 adults · not applicable - not a probability sample
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: items reported on non-LGBTQ and LGBTQ bases; subsample sizes not published

Wording notes: only the agree net published
GLAADfor GLAADGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedJan 2025 – Jan 31, 2025
transgender and nonbinary people deserve to live free from violence and discrimination

transgender and nonbinary people deserve to live their lives free from violence and discrimination

Agree - gay, lesbian and bisexual people deserve to live free from violence and discrimination
88%
Agree - transgender and nonbinary people deserve to live free from violence and discrimination
87%
Sample
2,514 adults · not applicable - not a probability sample
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: items reported on non-LGBTQ and LGBTQ bases; subsample sizes not published

Wording notes: abstract dignity statement rather than a policy trade-off
GallupContact & populationJan 2025 – Dec 31, 2025
self-identification as transgender

Which of the following do you consider yourself to be? You can select as many as apply: Straight or heterosexual; Lesbian; Gay; Bisexual; Transgender.

Transgender
1.1%
Sample
13,454 adults · ±1 percentage point
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: 832 LGBTQ+ adults, MOE ±4 percentage points

Wording notes: mixes sexual orientation and gender identity in one select-all listasked as a demographic item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Straight or heterosexual
  • Lesbian
  • Gay
  • Bisexual
  • Transgender
  • Something else
  • No opinion / refused
Siena College Research InstitutePolitical salienceJan 2025
how much thought respondents have given to transgender participation in sports (no-don't-know arm)

Turning to another issue in sports... How much thought have you given to the issue of whether transgender people should or should not be allowed to participate in organized sports with others that share their gender identity?

Some
31%
A lot
27%
Not very much
23%
None at all
19%
Sample
adults
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: figures recorded here are the no-don't-know (Group B) arm, the arm Siena carries forward as its trend line

Wording notes: no-don't-know arm
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A lot
  • Some
  • Not very much
  • None at all

Figures transcribed from public sources; each links to the original release. How to read this data →