Explore the polling

Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the address updates so any view can be shared.

Clear

1,931 questions from 644 polls

ANESSportsAug 3, 2024 – Nov 5, 2024
ANES variable V241373 (TRANSPOLICY_TRANSPRT) - banning transgender girls from K-12 girls' sports

Several states have considered laws that would ban transgender girls from participating in K-12 girls' sports. Do you favor, oppose, or neither favor nor oppose such a law?

Favor 51%23% Oppose
Sample
5,521 adult citizens
Method
mixed-mode probability
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: 5,521 pre-election interviews: 1,042 fresh in-person sample, 2,308 fresh web sample, 2,171 panel respondents carried forward from the 2016 and 2020 ANES studies

Wording notes: the restrictive policy is the object of favor/oppose, so 'favor' = restrictivelegislative-salience preamble ('Several states have considered laws') establishes the policy as already under serious considerationexplicit middle category offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • Neither favor nor oppose
Rasmussen ReportsYouth medical careparaphrasedAug 2024
children under 18; 'gender transition procedures' enumerated as puberty blockers, hormone drugs and surgeries; ACCESS/support framing but with restrictive-coded vocabulary

[Do you support or oppose] gender transition procedures - such as puberty blockers, hormone drugs, and surgeries - for children under 18

Strongly oppose
47%
Not sure
12%
Oppose (net) 58%Support (net) 30%
Sample
adults
Method
IVR
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: 'procedures' and 'hormone drugs' are restrictive-coded termsbundles blockers, hormones and surgeriesexplicit under-18 thresholdexplicit not-sure option, taken by 12%support framing rather than ban framing, so the 58% is opposition to the care, not support for a prohibition
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Somewhat support
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Not sure
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersSportsJul 29–30, 2024
whether trans women should be allowed to compete in women's sports

Should biological males who identify as women be allowed to compete in women's sports events?

No
72%
Yes
14%
Sample
registered voters
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record
Wording notes: 'biological males who identify as women' is the restrictive-side term of art and the only descriptor offeredno counter-framing or competing consideration offeredyes/no rather than a scaled item, which suppresses intensity
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Harvard CAPS/HarrisSchool policyJul 26–28, 2024
cutting school funding over 'radical gender ideology'

Recently, the Republican Party released its policy platform on a variety of issues, some of which are below. Please indicate how strongly you support or oppose each of the following policy goals: Cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children

Support 62%38% Oppose
Sample
2,196 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Split-sample battery: the two items below were each asked of roughly half the sample (unweighted bases 1,088 and 1,093).

Wording notes: verbatim GOP platform language, presented as such'radical gender ideology' and 'inappropriate' are the platform's own pejoratives, carried into the stemtriple-barreled: CRT, gender ideology, and unspecified 'inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Somewhat support
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Unsure/Don't know
Echelon InsightsSportsJun 10–12, 2024
paired-statement choice on whether trans athletes may play on teams matching gender identity

Paired-statement battery: respondents chose which of two statements they agreed with and how strongly.

1. Transgender athletes should be able to play on sports teams that match their current gender identity / 2. Transgender athletes should only be allowed to play on sports teams that match their birth gender

Strongly/somewhat agree with Option 2 (teams matching birth gender)
64%
Strongly agree with Option 2
54%
Strongly/somewhat agree with Option 1 (teams matching current gender identity)
27%
Strongly agree with Option 1
15%
Somewhat agree with Option 1
11%
Somewhat agree with Option 2
9%
Unsure
9%
Sample
1,013 likely voters · ±3.7 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: paired-statement forced choice with no middle option, so respondents who would restrict some levels of competition but not others must pick a side'birth gender' rather than 'birth sex' - contested, but symmetric with 'current gender identity'no age, sport or level of competition specifiedembedded in a long ideological paired-statement battery covering abortion, guns, immigration, hate speech and policing, which invites answering by ideological identity rather than by considering the specific case
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree with Option 1
  • Somewhat agree with Option 1
  • Somewhat agree with Option 2
  • Strongly agree with Option 2
  • Unsure
Research Co.School policyJun 8–10, 2024
SOGI-inclusive education in schools

As you may know, some school districts in Canada have relied on "SOGI-Inclusive Education", which raises awareness of and welcomes students of all sexual orientations, gender identities and family structures. From what you have seen, read, heard or experienced about "SOGI-Inclusive Education", do you support or oppose its use in your province?

Support (net)
48%
Oppose (net)
31%
Not sure
21%
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Wording notes: the stem supplies a sympathetic definition of SOGI-inclusive education before asking
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Moderately support
  • Moderately oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Not sure
Research Co.Youth medical careJun 8–10, 2024
banning gender-affirming surgery for minors aged 17 and under

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Banning top and bottom surgeries for minors aged 17 and under.

Agree 66%22% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Wording notes: policies are presented as a real government's proposalsthe item asks about a ban rather than about access
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.Youth medical careJun 8–10, 2024
banning hormone therapy and puberty blockers for minors aged 15 and under

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Banning hormone therapies for gender affirmation and puberty blockers for minors aged 15 and under.

Agree 61%26% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Wording notes: the item asks about a ban rather than about access
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.Youth medical careJun 8–10, 2024
hormone therapy for 16- and 17-year-olds with parental, physician and psychologist approval

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Allowing minors aged 16 and 17 to start hormone therapies for gender affirmation if they have the approval of their parents, a physician and a psychologist.

Agree 45%44% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Wording notes: stacks three separate approvals (parents, physician, psychologist) into the condition
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.Parental rightsJun 8–10, 2024
parental notification and consent for a name/pronoun change at school (under 16)

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Compelling schools to advise parents and obtain their consent if a minor aged 15 and under wishes to alter their name or pronouns.

Agree 60%30% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.School policyJun 8–10, 2024
parental opt-in for classroom discussion of gender identity and sexuality

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Ensuring that parents "opt-in" any minors every time topics such as gender identity, sexual orientation or sexuality are discussed in the classroom.

Agree 55%30% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.SportsJun 8–10, 2024
banning trans women from women's sports leagues

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? Banning transgender women from taking part in women's sports leagues competitions.

Agree 54%32% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 8 subgroup figures

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Wording notes: the item asks about a ban rather than about participation
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.School policyJun 8–10, 2024
provincial approval of third-party teaching materials on gender identity

Respondents were asked to weigh in on eight different policies that were introduced in 2024 by the Government of Alberta.

From what you have seen, read or heard, do you agree or disagree with the implementation of each of these policies in your province? The provincial education ministry approving all third-party teaching materials on gender identity, sexual orientation or sexuality that are used in the classroom.

Agree 48%37% Disagree
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Moderately agree
  • Moderately disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Research Co.School policyparaphrasedJun 8–10, 2024
predicted consequences of the Alberta policies

How likely or unlikely do you think each of the following outcomes is if these policies are implemented?

Likely - parents will be in full control of the way their children learn about sexuality
48%
Likely - gender-diverse youth will be placed at risk
48%
Likely - medical practitioners unable to assess the ethical and medical implications of individual cases
43%
Likely - gender-diverse youth unable to seek support from teachers or school staff
43%
Likely - an increase in sexually transmitted diseases
40%
Likely - an increase in teenage pregnancies
35%
Sample
1,001 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Crosstabs include parents/guardians of children aged 0-18 and 2021 federal election vote.

Wording notes: outcome list mixes protective and harmful consequences
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Likely
  • Unlikely
  • Not sure
PRRINondiscriminationJun 2024 – Jun 30, 2024
LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)

Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.

Favor 38%14% Oppose
Favor 36%
Sample
adults
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.

Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Skipped/Refused
PRRIYouth medical careJun 2024 – Jun 30, 2024
laws preventing parents from allowing a minor to receive gender-transition medical care

Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that prevent parents from allowing their child to receive medical care for a gender transition.

Favor 25%25% Oppose
Favor 21%
Sample
adults
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.

Wording notes: frames the ban as constraining parents rather than minors or providersdoes not name specific interventions (puberty blockers, hormones, surgery)'medical care for a gender transition' rather than 'gender-affirming care'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Skipped/Refused
PRRILegal documents & IDsJun 2024 – Jun 30, 2024
driver's licenses and government IDs required to display sex at birth rather than gender identity

Q10. How much do you favor or oppose each of the following? [RANDOMIZE]:

Laws that require driver's licenses or government ID to display the person's sex at birth rather than their gender identity.

Favor 30%23% Oppose
Favor 28%
Sample
adults
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: Monthly AVA wave; PRRI publishes only pooled annual n and MOE.

Wording notes: uses 'sex at birth' against 'gender identity'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly favor
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Skipped/Refused
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundNondiscriminationMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
adding sexual orientation and gender identity to federal nondiscrimination law

Do you support or oppose adding sexual orientation and gender identity to federal nondiscrimination laws, meaning LGBTQ+ Americans would be protected from discrimination in employment, housing, and access to public accommodations?

Support 62%26% Oppose
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 8 subgroup figures

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: explains the practical effect of the policy inside the question
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
  • Not sure
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundPolitical salienceMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
awareness of state legislation on transgender people

How much have you seen, read, or heard about some states in the U.S. passing or debating laws regarding transgender people?

A lot
14%
A little / Nothing (net) 54%A lot / Some (net) 46%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: neutral on the direction of the laws
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A lot
  • Some
  • A little
  • Nothing
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundSchool policyMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
concern about bullying of gay and transgender youth

Below is a list of concerns some Americans might have as it relates to the LGBTQ+ community. Please indicate how concerned you are about each one.

Below is a list of concerns some Americans might have as it relates to the LGBTQ+ community. Please indicate how concerned you are about each one. - Gay and transgender youth are being bullied and targeted, sometimes leading to suicide

Very concerned
52%
Total concerned 79%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: 'sometimes leading to suicide' raises the stakes inside the itemone-sided concern battery with no opposing concerns tested
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Very concerned
  • Somewhat concerned
  • Not concerned
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundPolitical salienceMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
concern that politicians are attacking gay and transgender youth (split sample)

Below is a list of concerns some Americans might have as it relates to the LGBTQ+ community. Please indicate how concerned you are about each one.

Below is a list of concerns some Americans might have as it relates to the LGBTQ+ community. Please indicate how concerned you are about each one. - [Form A] Politicians are attacking gay and transgender youth to divide us, maintain their political power and control, and score political points - [Form B] Politicians are attacking gay and transgender youth to divide us, impose their extreme views on all of us, and score political points

Total concerned
70%
Total concerned
67%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 6 subgroup figures

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: split-sample message test of two attack framingsasserts that politicians are 'attacking' youth
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Very concerned
  • Somewhat concerned
  • Not concerned
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundPolitical salienceMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
acceptability of an elected official who supports banning trans health care

Please indicate whether or not you could support an elected official with the following position, as long as you agreed with the elected official on most other things:

Please indicate whether or not you could support an elected official with the following position, as long as you agreed with the elected official on most other things: Someone who supports banning health care for transgender people.

Could not support
61%
Could support
22%
No impact on support
17%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 8 subgroup figures

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: 'banning health care for transgender people' is unqualified as to age - reads as a total ban including adults
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Could support
  • Could not support
  • No impact on support
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundYouth medical careMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
message test - youth care ban vs. parental rights / trust families and doctors / evidence-based care

Which side do you agree with more?

Which side do you agree with more? Statement 1: Those who say kids are being exposed to transgender ideas at too young an age, and we need to ban sex change hormones and gender reassignment surgery for kids. Statement 2: Those who say parents should have the right to seek out medically necessary health care for their children, without politicians and the government inserting themselves into those decisions. Statement 3: Those who say we should trust families and their doctors to make medically necessary health care decisions for themselves and their children, without politicians and the government inserting themselves into those decisions. Statement 4: Those who say we should set the record straight. In the rare instances where a young transgender person needs gender-affirming care to thrive, they undergo extensive counseling and together with their parents, always receive evidence-based care that has been approved by the American Medical Association.

Statement 2 - parents should have the right to seek medically necessary care
55%
Statement 3 - trust families and their doctors
55%
Statement 4 - extensive counseling and AMA-approved evidence-based care
55%
Statement 1 - ban hormones and surgery for kids
45%
Statement 1 - ban hormones and surgery for kids
45%
Statement 1 - ban hormones and surgery for kids
45%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: message-testing design - one fixed restrictive statement tested against three alternative rebuttalsrestrictive statement uses 'sex change hormones' and 'gender reassignment surgery'rebuttals invoke parental rights, medical authority, and the AMA
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Statement 1 (restrictive)
  • The paired progressive rebuttal statement
Navigator Research (GSG/GBAO)for Navigator Research - a project of Global Strategy Group and GBAO with an advisory committee including The Hub Project, EMILY's List, AFL-CIO, Center for American Progress Action Fund, EquisLabs, and Planned Parenthood Action FundParty & candidate handlingMay 30, 2024 – Jun 3, 2024
party trusted to protect the gay and transgender community

Below is a list of issues. Please indicate who you trust more to handle each one.

Below is a list of issues. Please indicate who you trust more to handle each one. - [Form A] Protecting the gay and transgender community - LGBTQ+ issues - [Form B] Protecting the rights and freedoms of the gay and transgender community

Biden and the Democratic Party
60%
Biden and the Democratic Party
55%
Biden and the Democratic Party
54%
The Republican Party
22%
The Republican Party
20%
The Republican Party
19%
Sample
1,000 registered voters · ±3.1 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Plus oversamples: 100 additional Hispanic voters, 75 additional Asian American and Pacific Islander voters, 100 additional African American voters, 105 additional independent voters, 200 additional voters ages 18-34.

Wording notes: split-sample wording test of 'protecting' vs. 'protecting the rights and freedoms of'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Biden and the Democratic Party
  • The Republican Party
  • Don't know
Rasmussen ReportsIdentity beliefsMay 28–30, 2024
belief that there are two genders

Do you agree or disagree with this statement: "There are two genders, male and female"?

Agree 72%23% Disagree
Sample
1,237 adults · +/- 3 percentage points
Method
IVR
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: single-statement agree/disagree format invites acquiescence biasno counter-statement offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Not sure
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersSportsMay 14–15, 2024
whether trans women should be allowed to compete in women's sports

Should biological males who identify as women be allowed to compete in women's sports events?

No
72%
Yes
17%
Sample
registered voters
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record
Wording notes: 'biological males who identify as women' is the restrictive-side term of art and the only descriptor offeredno counter-framing or competing consideration offeredyes/no rather than a scaled item, which suppresses intensity
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Napolitan News Service (RMG Research)for Napolitan News Service Gold Circle MembersBathrooms & facilitiesMay 14–15, 2024
whether trans women should be allowed to use women's locker rooms, showers and bathrooms

Should biological males who identify as women be allowed to use the women's locker rooms, showers, and bathrooms?

No
71%
Yes
18%
Sample
registered voters
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record
Wording notes: 'biological males who identify as women' used throughoutbundles locker rooms, showers and bathrooms into a single item, leading with the most intimate settingno counter-framing offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Siena College Research InstituteNondiscriminationMay 13–15, 2024
state constitutional amendment to protect transgender rights, asked as an isolated item

[Q23-Q24 ROTATED]

Do you support or oppose adding an amendment to the State Constitution to protect transgender rights?

Vol: In the middle
12%
Don't know/Refused
8%
Total support 48%Total oppose 32%
Sample
1,191 registered voters · +/- 3.9 percentage points, including design effects resulting from weighting
Method
mixed-mode probability
Where
US: New York
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 32 subgroup figures
Wording notes: rotated with a parallel abortion-rights amendment itemmiddle category accepted only as volunteered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly support
  • Somewhat support
  • Somewhat oppose
  • Strongly oppose
  • Vol: In the middle
  • Don't know/Refused
Siena College Research InstituteNondiscriminationMay 13–15, 2024
vote intention on the New York State Equal Rights Amendment (2024 Proposal 1), described as covering both abortion and transgender rights

The proposed New York State E-R-A, the Equal Rights Amendment, would protect both abortion rights and transgender rights. If that amendment to the State Constitution is on the ballot in November would you vote yes or no?

Yes
59%
No
26%
Vol: Won't vote on the amendment
7%
Don't know/Refused
8%
Sample
1,191 registered voters · +/- 3.9 percentage points, including design effects resulting from weighting
Method
mixed-mode probability
Where
US: New York
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 32 subgroup figures
Wording notes: bundles abortion rights and transgender rights in a single item, as the ballot measure itself did
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Vol: Won't vote on the amendment
  • Don't know/Refused
CygnalNondiscriminationMay 6–8, 2024
whether Title IX should cover transgender women ('biological men who identify as women')

As you may know, Title IX is a landmark federal civil rights law enacted in the 1970s that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex and covers a wide range of areas including academic admissions, athletics, sexual harassment and employment. For decades, Title IX has been vital in opening doors for generations of women and girls.

The Biden Administration recently changed Title IX rules without a vote of Congress. Their updated rules require colleges and universities to grant biological men who identify as women the same rights as biological women. Knowing this, do you agree or disagree that Title IX should apply to biological men who identify as women?

Agree 61%61% Disagree
Agree (total) 27.4%
Sample
1,500 likely voters · ±2.45%
Method
unknown
Where
US national - 39 U.S. House battleground districts
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 21 subgroup figures
Wording notes: preamble frames Title IX as having 'been vital in opening doors for generations of women and girls' before the trans item, priming a zero-sum reading'biological men who identify as women' is the restrictive-side term of art and is the only descriptor offered'without a vote of Congress' characterizes the rule change as procedurally illegitimateno counter-argument offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Unsure
CygnalNondiscriminationMay 6–8, 2024
state laws barring trans women from female sports and women's bathrooms

Some states are passing laws that prohibit biological men from participating in female sports or using women's bathrooms. Some critics say that biological men who identify as women should have the same non-discrimination protections from Title IX that biological women receive. Knowing this, do you agree or disagree that states should be able to pass laws that maintain protections for solely for biological women?

Agree 67%21% Disagree
Sample
1,500 likely voters · ±2.45%
Method
unknown
Where
US national - 39 U.S. House battleground districts
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 21 subgroup figures
Wording notes: double-barreled: bundles sports and bathrooms into one itemthe opposing view is attributed to unnamed 'critics' while the restrictive view is stated in the pollster's own voice as 'maintain[ing] protections''biological men' used for trans women throughoutcontains a typographical error ('for solely for') in the fielded wording
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Unsure
GallupGeneral acceptanceMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
moral acceptability of changing one's gender

Regardless of whether or not you think it should be legal, for each one, please tell me whether you personally believe that in general it is morally acceptable or morally wrong.

Regardless of whether or not you think it should be legal, for each one, please tell me whether you personally believe that in general it is morally acceptable or morally wrong. -- Changing one's gender

Morally acceptable 44%51% Morally wrong
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 8 subgroup figures

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: frames gender transition as a moral questionbattery placement alongside transgressive behaviors
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Morally acceptable
  • Morally wrong
  • Depends on situation (vol.)
  • Not a moral issue (vol.)
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
laws banning gender-transition treatments for minors - general version (split sample A)

Do you favor or oppose laws that ban treatments and medical procedures for minors seeking to change their gender?

Sample
asked of a subset: Democrats, Independents, Republicansfull poll: 1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: 'minors seeking to change their gender' places agency with the minorasks about banning care rather than about the care itselfdoes not name any specific treatment
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
laws banning gender-transition treatments for minors - itemized version (split sample B)

Do you favor or oppose laws that ban psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries for minors seeking to align with their gender identity?

Sample
asked of a subset: Democrats, Independents, Republicansfull poll: 1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: triple-barreled: bundles psychological support, hormones and surgery into one item'minors seeking to align with their gender identity'asks about banning care rather than about the care itself
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
Form A / general arm -- gender-affirming care described only as 'various treatments and medical procedures'

Next, we have a question about gender-affirming care, which refers to various treatments and medical procedures that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity.

Next, we have a question about gender-affirming care, which refers to various treatments and medical procedures that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity. Do you favor or oppose laws that ban certain types of gender-affirming care for minors?

Favor 34%62% Oppose
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: randomized half sample (general description arm)asks about favoring a BAN, so 'oppose' is the pro-access response -- a reversal of most trans-care items'certain types of' softens the ban object without specifying which typesthe preamble defines gender-affirming care for the respondent, supplying information most items withhold
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
Form B / specific arm -- gender-affirming care described as 'psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries'

Next, we have a question about gender-affirming care, which refers to various measures including psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity.

Next, we have a question about gender-affirming care, which refers to various measures including psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity. Do you favor or oppose laws that ban certain types of gender-affirming care for minors?

Favor 36%61% Oppose
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: randomized half sample (specific description arm)names surgeries explicitly in the preambleasks about favoring a BAN, so 'oppose' is the pro-access responsebrackets the treatment list with the least invasive option first (psychological support), which cuts against the usual salience effect of naming surgery
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
Form A / general arm -- gender-affirming care described only as 'various treatments and medical procedures'

Next, we have a question about gender-affirming care, which refers to various treatments and medical procedures that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity.

(Asked of a half sample) Next, we have a question about gender affirming care, which refers to various treatments and medical procedures that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity. Do you favor or oppose laws that ban certain types of gender affirming care for minors?

Favor 34%62% Oppose
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: randomized half sample (general description arm)asks about favoring a BAN, so 'oppose' is the pro-access response -- a reversal of most trans-care items'certain types of' softens the ban object without specifying which typesthe preamble defines gender-affirming care for the respondent, supplying information most items withhold
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
Form B / specific arm -- gender-affirming care described as 'psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries'

Next, we have a question about gender-affirming care, which refers to various measures including psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity.

(Asked of a half sample) Next, we have a question about gender affirming care, which refers to various measures including psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity. Do you favor or oppose laws that ban certain types of gender affirming care for minors?

Favor 36%61% Oppose
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: randomized half sample (specific description arm)names surgeries explicitly in the preambleasks about favoring a BAN, so 'oppose' is the pro-access responsebrackets the treatment list with the least invasive option first (psychological support), which cuts against the usual salience effect of naming surgery
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
minors (no age threshold named); GENERIC treatment description - 'various treatments and medical procedures'; BAN framing; split-sample Form A

Next, we have a question about gender affirming care, which refers to various treatments and medical procedures that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity.

Next, we have a question about gender affirming care, which refers to various treatments and medical procedures that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity. Do you favor or oppose laws that ban certain types of gender affirming care for minors?

Favor 34%62% Oppose
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: BAN framing (favor = restrict)the hedge 'certain types of' leaves the scope of the ban undefinedsupplies a neutral definition of gender-affirming care before askingno treatment namedno age threshold namedno parental-consent or physician context
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion
GallupYouth medical careMay 2024 – May 23, 2024
minors (no age threshold named); SPECIFIC treatments named - psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries; BAN framing; split-sample Form B

Next, we have a question about gender affirming care, which refers to various measures including psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity.

Next, we have a question about gender affirming care, which refers to various measures including psychological support, hormonal treatments and medical surgeries that help transgender individuals align with their gender identity. Do you favor or oppose laws that ban certain types of gender affirming care for minors?

Favor 36%61% Oppose
Sample
1,024 adults · ±4 percentage points (±6 points on each half sample)
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: gender-affirming care items were a split sample: two half samples of 512 adults each, MOE ±6 points

Wording notes: BAN framing (favor = restrict)names three treatments including surgery, but brackets surgery with psychological support - the most sympathetic item in the list leads'certain types of' hedge retainedno age threshold named
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • No opinion

Figures transcribed from public sources; each links to the original release. How to read this data →